rubicon789
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2004
- Posts
- 178
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lrjtcaptain said:Well, im not gonna argue a FAF for an ILS....that is not relavent in this case.....
A Squared said:Actually, it is relevant, that's the issue at hand. Mini was suggesting that there would be a benefit to giving an higher intercept altitude bacause you would intercept the g/s sooner, therefore be inside the FAF sooner, in case wx deteriorates.
The only problem with that theory is that, as Flyboyphil pointed out, it's not considered the FAF unless you're at the gs intercept altitude specified on the IAP.
Gemboy75 said:I don't believe you can land regardless of inside or ouside the FAF part 91 or otherwise.
why not just call up tower on the approach and then tell them you don't want to hear what RVR is until your established