Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ATA - Any News?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Jim Smyth said:
Angus, this news about the cut backs at ATA and the phase out of Chicago Express in March just happened yesterday! When I was in there senorio back in 1991 I was still tipping a few back for the pain. A few nice comments would go a long way rather than rubbing salt in the open wound. Also Since you say you have been there before I would think you would have some compassion.

Jim:

I have ALOT of compassion for the good people in this industry. I have no compassion for the few ATA Pilots who spewed their B.S. on flightinfo during the MDW takeover bid by Southwest and Airtran. I also do not believe that being in a "bad" situation gives anyone a free pity pass to say what ever they want with immunity..... even on the internet.

I want to hear from the ATA Pilots... and they are all too chickensh!t to speak up... except to play the "poor pitiful me card"... or to blast me for pointing out their coworkers hypocrisy and lack of integrity.

Obviously their little game is working... you seem to feel "sorry" for them.
 
My question is why the deafening silence??

Already answered:

Here's a big difference: Airtran offered MDW non-pilot employeesinterviews. SWA is offering EVERY furloughed pilot an interview.Airtran wanted some gates and routes. That's it. SWA not only seems towant ATA to survive (in spite of ATA mgt, some would say) but now theyhave a financial stake in that survival.

That and the vehement denials by some on this board that our contract contained fragmentation language which would have required pilots to go with aircraft OR ROUTES. Now I know as well as the next guy that that section could have been trashed by the court, but the prevailing attitude exhibited here was "It's not a merger - we owe you nothing." Fair enough - but at least acknowledge what is in our contract. Additionally, a simple statement by the Airtran union that they would hope their company would bring ATA pilots on would have gone a long way. The silence on that subject was truly deafening. The first time any moves were made (and it was by Airtran management) was when it became the loss of jobs would be a political issue in Chicago.

I'm not here to bash Airtran, the few of their pilots I've talked to have been great (heck, I may be looking for work there soon), but hopefully the above answers your question.

As an aside - one of my FO's just related a little incident which occured less than two weeks ago. He was jumpseating to work on a Southwest flight, and when he went forward to introduce himself to the captain, was greeted with "Welcome to the family." It's a small thing, and may not amount to much in the long run, but it's certainly a nice gesture . . .
 
Angus said:
Jim:
Obviously their little game is working... you seem to feel "sorry" for them.

Hey Anus:

On behalf of the AirTran Pilots... let me be the first to say... F.U.!
 
All furloughed ATA folks are gonna get a shot at SWA if they want it. I have two buddies that I used to work with at Mesaba that are getting F'ed at the end of the month from ATA that have interviews early in FEB with us. I hope like hell we hire all the good ATA folks!!! It sucks that times are tough now at ATA and I wouldn't wish it on anybody (well maybe Low :) ) but I am very glad SWA is doing the right thing and giving the great ATA folks their shot!

Go get em guys. Hope to see you in Big D. I'll get the first 2!!

Oak
 
Angus,

Man you sure have a lot of anger at ATA pilots.

We never had a problem with the AirTran pilots only the deal. Weprobably had a few pilots say things that they want to take back inthe heat of the moment but history is history. The facts are wethought AWA was going to offer more jobs than AirTran, wouldn't it bewise to back such a plan?

Well, hindsight is 20/20 isn't it. I still believe that the SWA dealwill be better for ATA pilots than the AirTran plan, I have neverthought that SWA was coming to the rescue, this is business.

We will feel some pain for around a year but the code shareagreementwill be huge and will provide a lot of revenue for bothairlines and hopefully more jobs. AirTran is a fine airline but let'sbe honest SWA has more muscle right now than most airlines, so whichairline would you rather be partnered with.

SWA has supplied ATA with one of their finest execs to help turn usaround, AirTran offered no such deal. SWA offered DIP financing andwill offer to buy 27.5% stock in the company an additional 30 milliondollars, AirTran offered no such deal.

SWA is giving our furloughed preferential interviews, AirTran sent anHR lady to talk for a day, neither airline was obligated to do anythingand is much appreciated.

SWA will greatly expand our code share agreement and I believe it willbe he envy of the industry. It doesn't take a genius to figure out whyATA pilots are excited about the SWA deal. SWA is providing assistancein every level including crew scheduling and more to turn ATA into alean efficient airline. SWA has the resources, technical savvy and mostimportantly the desire to make this code share agreement successful.

ATA has a new mission to provide a new revenue stream to SWA, expandour military and Hawaii flying and once we are stabilized we willexpand overseas for SWA.

This is the plan. It's business and not even your business Angus, soquit being so emotional. I'm excited and most ATA pilots are too. I amnot happy about furloughing our pilots but we will see how many find anew home with SWA, GOOD LUCK guys and gals.
 
Last edited:
I guess when you're a young inexperienced punkatabankruptcarrier.... its more fun to re-write history, andjustmakethings upabout things you know nothing about.

Angus,

I'm still trying to figure you out and why you have so much anger.Yousaid you quit UAL because you didn't want to scab. I know a lotofpilots at UAL and the only pilots that quit during that strike inthe80s were the pilots who did cross the line. I still don't know whyacorporate pilot is so interested in this board to the point you wanttobanter on and on over something that has nothing to do with, ormaybeit does. H'mm curious'er and curious'er.....

By the way I used to fly for an old legacy carrier that is no longer with us and I haven't worn diapers since 1960.
 
Last edited:
I'm probably one of those that some might think disparaged Airtran's family lineage. I didn't, but I was not happy with the "deal" offered by Airtran managment or the defense of it given by Airtran employees on this site. I voiced my opinion, and I stand by it.

I'm now troubled by the posts of those that say they are from Airtran that seem to be dancing on our "grave." I don't see the recent announcments decreasing service in KIND as being the beginning of the end. I see it as the beginning of the beginning. A new sheriff is in town and he ain't lettin' the same ol' folks run the saloon. He's beginning to run the undesirable varmints out of town. There is probably more bad news to come, but I think there is more good news than bad. Yes, a lot of guys/gals are losing their jobs. Being a junior captain I fly with a lot of them. We've got a lot of VERY senior guys who are ready to close the place down, literally, yesterday! I don't really want to work with them, but what can you do? There's those 10%'ers everywhere.

I still think this codeshare is better for us than anything else offered, or almost offered up. The potential is ASTOUNDING! It's up to SWA and the interim managment to make it happen. I'm also not feeling the LUV by SWA. I am afraid, sometimes, that we've been used to keep the competion out of MDW, and to initiate expanded service to previously non-SWA cities. Irrational fear, I know. We shall see.

Airtran has hired about as many ATA pilots in the last six months as SWA has, but SWA is planning on interviewing many more.

Best of luck to those furloughed at ATA and Chico. I know it sucks and there's not much I can say to help except don't wallow in pity or quit.
 
Angus said:
Jim: you seem to feel "sorry" for them.

Well, Yes I do. I have worked next to them for many years at Midway airport. Some are good friends that I have worked with at different airlines in the past. I was in there shoes and standing in the unemployment line in 1991 and it wasnt one of the high points of my life. Kinda felt embarrased and ashamed appling for unemployment for the first time ever. Worked 4 different jobs putting food on the table and to have health insurance for the family until I could get back with another airline and fulfill my career destiny. I guess I do feel for them. Thats called compassion, something you obviously dont have.
 
Jim Smyth said:
Thats called compassion, something you obviously dont have.

You also forgot credibility.

Also, FWIW, the P2P folks @ CAL ALPA mentioned they are trying to work out a preferential interview set up for ATA pilots. Supposedly all recalls and the XJET pilots will be back by early summer and off the street hiring shortly thereafter.
 
More news.

Heads have been rolling in IND. Good, 'bout time. Some more may come. Dennison has only been around week. Union met with the company yesterday; they all came out of the meeting feeling better about our situation. To a man, they've stated they felt comfortable with our new Co-CRO. We've also learned that the Co. needs $3M per month for 4 months in concessions from the pilot group. Neg. Com. is meeting with them next week.

The first criteria item this pilot group has stated that it needs to even consider concessions was new managment. Off to a good start, some would like a few more (by name) to go.

The second criteria is a plan. That is forthcoming, but staving off the "bleeding" in IND has been a smart start.

We're in the saddle now, the horse ain't broke yet, but he ain't throwing me so easy. We might just yet make a good saddle horse of him yet. It's a long ride ahead!
 
Also, FWIW, the P2P folks @ CAL ALPA mentioned they are trying to work out a preferential interview set up for ATA pilots.

Thank you, that would be great. Particularly since you're getting 6 B757-300's from us in the next few months.
 
Anus,

Isn't there a 91 forum to rant and rave on? The reasons you fly 91 is simple. One you endanger only a few people at a time. Two you have only a few people to piss off when you fly with them. As old as you are, you would think, you would have learned about a thing called class. I guess you can't teach an old dog new tricks though. The fact is that we (ATA) have enjoyed a great relationship between pilot groups long before any of this had taken place. Now you need to relax before you have a heart attack and can't fly and piss people off anymore.

Jim,

Thanks always for the kind words.
 
Well...welll... this certainly has been enlightening. Lets run thru a quick list of what we've learned.

1. To decide to leave an airline during a strike, and NOT scab... and move on with life and economics and career is to be labelled a quitter.

2. ATA Pilots on these forums love scabs.. or at least embrace that mentality... so as not to be labelled a "quitter.

3. CAL Pilots that ARE/WERE scabs will weigh in on threads without even bothering to address the topic.

4. Pilots from a bankrupt carrier are suddenly entitled to sh!t all over these forums with immunity to any sort of accountability for their words.

5. Original Ex-Midway Pilots will spout off about compassion... for what reason... I have no idea..... since we're talking about integrity and honesty... not prostitution.

6. That Pilots on these forums are more interested in short term memory loss and allowing others to sh!t on them rather than call it as it REALLY is.

7. That the little boys on these threads will make diversions about "pity" rather than address issues brought up.

8. That there is ONE ATA PILOT on these forums with "integrity". That would be Halintexas. At least he has the b*lls to at least fess up and address his posts... and at least back it up with consistency. I'd fly with someone like that any day over the whining, wannabe, attention deficit, integrity lacking, posters here who roll over and let anyone give it to them.

No wonder the airlines are such as mess.... just look at you all, and read your own writings, what a real award winning panel of schleps.
 
Last edited:
Boeingman said:
That's odd. My ALPA pin has a star on top of it.

That was quick... What makes you think I was talking about YOU?? Feelin' a little guilty... or just a sore spot.

BTW - As far as ALPA is concerned there are no more scabs at CAL.... so what is your point... besides your head?
 
Angus said:
That was quick...

I'm sorry is there a time compliance period to respond to something? Yours was 6 minutes, but who is counting. Pardon me for just happen to be reading this. I promise I'll wait any amount of time you specify your highness to make the content more acceptable.


Angus said:
What makes you think I was talking about YOU??

Seeing as how I was the first obvious CAL pilot to post something, your thinly veiled reference seemed obvious, not to mention stupid.

Angus said:
Feelin' a little guilty... or just a sore spot.

Obviously, you haven't a clue as to the meaning of the star. If you did you wouldn't of written that. It only makes you look more of an idiot than you have already proven yourself to be.

Angus said:
BTW - As far as ALPA is concerned there are no more scabs at CAL.... so what is your point... besides your head?

Incorrect statement.

So you claim you quit UAL before their strike? What color was your uniform and who was your strike chairman? Careful on your answer.
 
Last edited:
HalinTexas said:
Thank you, that would be great. Particularly since you're getting 6 B757-300's from us in the next few months.


If I hear anything more specific I will post it. It was mentioned in the last P2P call so it is not just crew room rumor or a jumpseat tale.

BTW, I thought we were getting 8 of them.
 
Boeingman said:
I'm sorry is there a time compliance period to respond to something? Yours was 6 minutes, but who is counting. Pardon me for just happen to be reading this. I promise I'll wait any amount of time you specify your highness to make the content more acceptable.




Seeing as how I was the first obvious CAL pilot to post something, your thinly veiled reference seemed obvious, not to mention stupid.



Obviously, you haven't a clue as to the meaning of the star. If you did you wouldn't of written that. It only makes you look more of an idiot than you have already proven yourself to be.



Incorrect statement.

So you claim you quit UAL before their strike? What color was your uniform and who was your strike chairman? Careful on your answer.

OOOOOHHHHH... a quiz!!!! Oh Oh Oh OH... I know... I know... Pick me....... Pick me!!! I'm willing to bet that I could show you my uniform... (I still have them) including the last paystub I got there, and YOU would still sit here and argue with me. That is the sign of a real jack*ss.....

How Quaint...:rolleyes:

I wouldn't participate in one of your guilt ridden diversions even if you wore that ALPA pin like a hemorroid pad.... which I'm willing to bet you have.

Wow.... tsk..tsk...tsk....

I guess a sore spot doesn't always heal. Once again... please show me where I singled you out by name sparky...

Hey ... I know... how about commenting on the issue of this thread???

LOL!!
 
Angus said:
OOOOHHHHH... a quiz!!!! Oh Oh Oh OH... I know... I know... Pick me....... Pick me!!! I'm willing to bet that I could show you my uniform... (I still have them) including the last paystub I got there, and YOU would still sit here and argue with me. That is the sign of a real jack*ss.....

Actually, the sign of a real jacka$$ is someone that responds like an 8 year old with zero intellect. I didn’t ask to see your imaginary uniform either. I guess from your reading comprehension, English is a third or fourth language for you?

Angus said:
I wouldn't participate in one of your guilt ridden diversions even if you wore that ALPA pin like a hemorroid pad.... which I'm willing to bet you have.

There is a difference between can’t and wouldn’t. Ask your mom and dad to explain the difference to you. Guilt ridden? Now give me a real good laugh and tell me what I have to be guilty of? Aside from responding to an even bigger moron that LowIQer?

P.S. The answer is Brown. I don't think you'll be able to find it with a google search.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top