ASA union recall

[COOPERVANE]

We should have done this a year ago. We need to do it now...not in another year.

These guys have IGNORED the concerns and goals of the pilot group. They will not pursue holding the company accountable for contract violations. They DO NOT represent most of the pilots at this airline. They are very self serving. It seems all about keeping their cushy jobs NOT flying the contract they crammed down our throats and misrepresented at the roadshows.

Our QOL has been cut in HALF during their reign. There has been virtually NO communication from them and if criticized the response is "call your rep" Yeah 1700 phone calls to reps is the most efficient method we can muster. All while they got raises and free lunch.

I'm sorry...I am tired of it. Even if we throw the baby out with the bathwater. These clowns need to get the boot.

Bob Arnold was in a completely different class.

I don't believe Faruzzi would be corrupted like these guys.

 

[Redan]

^^^^
Agree with Coopervane.
Some say it's crazy to toss out the reps during negotiations.
Others say we damm well better do it before it's too late.
The majority seem to favor the latter, as do I.
This is something which should have happened long ago.
Mid-negotiations or not, whatever happens following the ouster will most likely
be more favorable than the alternative.
I for one, have zero confidence in the current lot with their hush-hush, secretive behind closed doors maneuvering.

 

[asa rat]

The members in good standing at the meeting may get to vote on a motion to recall. If it passes by simple majority, a ballot to recall will be sent out to all pilots in good standing in that council. If they are recalled, an interim rep is appointed by the MEC until a permanent one can finish the term after being elected by the members in good standing of said council.

If the motion passes I assume both parties will present their facts to the pilot group for consideration before the recall vote (Is this correct?) AND if so, why in the world wouldn't we want to hear the facts?
Assuming this is correct, every effort should be made to pass the motion including mass distribution of proxies.
Let's hear the arguments from both sides.

 

[Nevets]

If the motion passes I assume both parties will present their facts to the pilot group for consideration before the recall vote (Is this correct?) AND if so, why in the world wouldn't we want to hear the facts?
Assuming this is correct, every effort should be made to pass the motion including mass distribution of proxies.
Let's hear the arguments from both sides.

I think that Roberts rules have discussion happen before a motion is voted on. This is assuming there is a first and second of the motion.

 

[crj567]

On a serious note,
1) what happens if we recall the four?

2)Does that prompt a new election?

3)Timeline for that to happen?

4) When will new LEC be able to elect new MEC?

This is what I am concerned about. Our current guys have (as a whole) done a TERRIBLE job. But there are worse people who could replace them (no kidding.) We need to be very careful with who would take these positions. We need some people who won't screw it up even worse.

BTW- What ever happened to that Red Arrow grievance (after like 4 years?)

 

[damnflyboy]

Ironically enough, even with a rebid for April, we still don't know if we can attend the meeting or attempt to bid it off.

Hahahahahahaha

 

[damnflyboy]

This is what I am concerned about. Our current guys have (as a whole) done a TERRIBLE job. But there are worse people who could replace them (no kidding.) We need to be very careful with who would take these positions. We need some people who won't screw it up even worse.

BTW- What ever happened to that Red Arrow grievance (after like 4 years?)

They separated the bound pages and used them as paper plates because they ran out during one of their bi-weekly pizza parties.

Remember, they got us an extra .12 for min-day. But don't worry, they get 6 & they're looking out for us. uke:

 

[bhaycraft]

Time for Regime change !

 

[wms]

Just don't replace them with Jackson 5.

 

[FishandFly]

I will vote for ANYONE who states that they desire to aim for one list. Enough of the "hopefully our 1/3 of the pie does well this year..." The time has come to diversify.

 

[wms]

Why would we want one list with a bunch of jelly fish? That said I think when we have our own integration compete one list will be the next project.

 

[ASApuppy]

FWIW, I have spoken with those on Neg Com about "One List" and it is banned from discussion per the Transition and Merger Agreement between ASA and XJET MEC's, and Skywest Inc. It says that parties will not persue merger with Skywest while negotiating ASA and Xjet joint contract and seniority list. Basically, once we have a single list for the two of us, there is nothing stopping the filing with the NMB for single carrier status with Skywest.

I am as p-ed off as the next guy with whats been coming out of our MEC, or lack there of. But, I do understand that all parties have commited legally to not pursue One List from 3 carriers. Seems logical. Bet big money that our new Operating Cert and the new Joint Contract is exactly what Jerry will accept for a combined Carrier. Kinda like how our new uniforms are exactly like what Skywest has already.

 

[SpaceShipEarth]

Skywest has gold and silver too? Who knew?

 

[pilotnbr1]

I asked Sterling Roach once about why the ASA MEC had no interest in going after one-list. He told me that the MEC felt that we would be better off without it. I think that tells you something about this MEC.

 

[TDK90]

Does 07/06 DOH hold EWR E145 CA? Just curious, I know there would be fences..