IronCityBlue
Blue member (hey wait...)
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2006
- Posts
- 638
If you work for Delta, you don't "own" one seat of DL code, either. In fact, the last time I looked, more than 50% of Delta Domestic is now flown by DCI. Can anyone else confirm this? The only entity that "owns" Delta code is Delta, Inc.--not to be confused with the other wholly-owned subsidiary, Delta Airlines.
In the late 90's, the number of pilots on the Delta seniority list approached 10,000. Today, it is around 5800. What leverage do you have to negotiate anything?
In your mind, outsourcing may have gone too far, but the reality is that it will continue to grow and your domestic flying will continue to shrink. Your pilots do not want to fly small jets. They gave that up in 1996 which allowed outsourcing, and the rest of the pilot groups had to follow. Of course, you were probably in elementary school then, and should not be blamed.
The only thing that mainline pilot groups will negotiate is further scope relief to regain some pay and benefits. As a result, you will perpetuate the outsourcing that you so hate! It's coming. International flying will increase, requiring a few more pilots, but the relief on scope will cause a further shrinking of your list. Outsourcing and further shifting of domestic flying to DCI will continue under present trends and fuel costs. MGMT has you over the barrel. Just watch for the next round of concessionary bargaining.
The only entity that "owns" DL code or seats is Inc.--not your pilot group or the wholly-owned company that you work for!
The continued growth of outsourced lift may or may not happen. But it is not up to you. It is 100% up to mainline pilot groups. They have to not only approve additional outsourcing, as you predict, but also they have to continually approve all current outsourcing. I predict the trend will first stop, and then reverse itself.
What baffles me is why you think more outsourcing is a good thing. Your entire future depends on mainline shortsightedness continuing for all time. That's a mighty arrogant foundation for your argument. You might be right, but I predict you won't be.
As for "half of all mainline domestic flights" it is somewhere near half the block hours, which is still an extremely small percentage of total seats. That's why I advocate the immediate return of all 90 seaters, followed by a 3 or 4 year return of all 70 seaters, and then begin to address the 50 seat market at a much later date, keeping that unlimited for the meantime (except new fleet types, for you never know when a 50 seat sized 787 may come along).