Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ASA TA summary....

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
More off the JP MORGAN site"
Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. may match your contributions on a discretionary basis for contributions you make up to 6% of your compensation

It appears maybe the summary doesnt have the full language and they have closed the loop hole that now makes the cp match madatory for years 1-6 as opposed to discretionary.
 
Well that isn't how it is worded in the current contract, and that isn't how it is currentyly applied....

I contribute 15500 to the plan..... 8% of that is $1240. 75% of that is only $930.... That can't be right.... We get far more than that currently.... We get 75% of 6% of what we make, which is 4.5% of what we make.... which is about $4000 for me... There is no way we went from $4000 contribution to $930 contribution.....

I think I see the point of confusion here. It means the firs x% of the pilots TOTAL income that he/she contributes to the fund. Here's an example:

Pilot's total income 50,000 dollars. (easy math) Pilot's elected contribution: 20% (the max I think) which is 10,000. Company match is 75% of first 6%. (of pilot's annual income) 6% of 50,000 is 3000. 75% of that is 2250 company match.

Pilot's total income 80,000. (harder math) Pilot's elected contribution: 20% = 16,000. Company match is 75% of the first 8%. (over 10 years) 8%=6400. 75% of that is 4800. Company match for this employee is 4800.
 
I think I see the point of confusion here. It means the firs x% of the pilots TOTAL income that he/she contributes to the fund. Here's an example:

Pilot's total income 50,000 dollars. (easy math) Pilot's elected contribution: 20% (the max I think) which is 10,000. Company match is 75% of first 6%. (of pilot's annual income) 6% of 50,000 is 3000. 75% of that is 2250 company match.

Pilot's total income 80,000. (harder math) Pilot's elected contribution: 20% = 16,000. Company match is 75% of the first 8%. (over 10 years) 8%=6400. 75% of that is 4800. Company match for this employee is 4800.


I agree, but it isn't worded that way....
 
I think you should call and discuss it with your MEC. Call their office. The will talk to you about it.


Just kidding....

I will..... but I think it is just a typo....
 
Where's the language limiting ready-reserve duty to ATL. Just imagine wandering around MGM for 8 hours.
 
I gotta say, for 5 years of negotiating, I wasn't really blown away. As far as the retirement, the summary states that it is the first 6% of the pilots contribution. I'm on the fence about how to vote, I'll have to see how the road shows go.
 
The scope is terrible.... I would have taken the SKYW agreement lock stock and barrel in contract form over this.
 
Crash Pad,

What you see are just highlights. Hopefully the end result, especially concerning scope, will have much more defined lanquage.

Goat
 
I have to agree with outtahere, from what I've read, I wasn't really impressed. I think a good portion of this TA was negotiated when times were a lot tougher for airlines and our MEC negotiated as such. Now that things are improving, the company sees an opportunity to lock in an agreement which gives us a few improvements while gutting some things that really helped us (ie. premium).

If ASA is truly concerned with on time performance, why would they want to ditch premium? What motivation does a pilot have to get a flight in early if it means a cut in his paycheck? I can see a crew flying along at .74 seeing that they're going to arrive 20 minutes early pulling back to .70 to arrive closer to the scheduled time. Then again, maybe that's what the company wants since the flight would still be on time and there's the gas savings to consider.

Granted, this is only a summary so I'll reserve judgement until I see the final language.
 
So whys is it newhires now get off probation at IOE Completion + 1 year?

We currently have a 12 month category freeze, the new contract is 18 months, unless you go to a lower pay rate then its 24 months.

For pro-checks you now only get training pay, no lost block, and same with vacation (3.00 hrs/day (TA)).
 
If ASA is truly concerned with on time performance, why would they want to ditch premium? What motivation does a pilot have to get a flight in early if it means a cut in his paycheck? I can see a crew flying along at .74 seeing that they're going to arrive 20 minutes early pulling back to .70 to arrive closer to the scheduled time. Then again, maybe that's what the company wants since the flight would still be on time and there's the gas savings to consider.

You still get paid for the block time, so if you do a scheduled 2 hour flight in 1:30, you still get paid 2 hours.

Premium only helped the people that were at guarantee for the month (nappers, reserve) and those guys will make the same or more with the rigs and min day.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom