S
sunlitpath
Yes. The verdict is in, and it's a unanimous decision. You are hereby guilty of being a clueless dolt...What was that phrase you used? Oh yeah, "you are a clueless dolt..."
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. The verdict is in, and it's a unanimous decision. You are hereby guilty of being a clueless dolt...What was that phrase you used? Oh yeah, "you are a clueless dolt..."
That's really the point. All kidding aside, if I were on the jury, I would listen to the evidence to determine a verdict. My point is that probability is not on the defendant's side. Stating this fact does not mean he is declared guilty.
Yes. The verdict is in, and it's a unanimous decision. You are hereby guilty of being a clueless dolt...
Actually, upon further review, I am familiar with the concept of peremptory challenges, because that's precisely what I described. I was just unfamiliar with the legal term. I guess I do have an intimate knowledge of the criminal justice system. Therefore, your assumptions are well founded. Don't beat yourself up. We all make mistakes.No way! Seriously?
I assumed that someone with such an intimate knowledge of the criminal judicial system would likely be familiar with the concept of "peremptory challenges" but then again you know what happens when you assume...
Here's your sign... And a link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peremptory_challenge
Actually, upon further review, I am familiar with the concept of peremptory challenges, because that's precisely what I described. I was just unfamiliar with the legal term. I guess I do have an intimate knowledge of the criminal justice system. Therefore, your assumptions are well founded. Don't beat yourself up. We all make mistakes.
I'll get right on it. I do need to get up. I think I'll make some tacos.Hey, go and clean out your garage or something! ;-)
A few are innocent, (like OJ).