PCL:
Joe's point is that ALPA has the same duty to the ASA pilots as United, FedEx, or Delta pilots. His opinion and mine is that no commercial pilot in 121 service should be in a "stepping stone" job. Once a pilot is flying revenue passengers, they are full fledged airline pilots.
You are correct that AirTran currently owns its scope (and hope things stay that way) and Delta thinks it owns theirs (that cat is at least head and shoulders out of the bag).
ALPA is going to have to make scope stronger and in doing so the majors are going to have to reach out to their codeshare partners to develop enforceable brand scope and job protections. None of us has the power to make these needed changes on our own.
Airlines come and go. Airlines that were the "flavor of the month" can become losers and vice versa. Val-u-Jet looked like career suicide at one time, then it became the greatest place for the quick upgrade on new equipment. Now, their contract has many outsiders scratching their heads wondering what the future holds. My Dad thought those guys who quit Tigers to fly for that little Falcon 20 startup in Memphis were nuts.... and that turned out to be one of the best golden tickets in aviation.
Hopefully what we can achieve through a union is to add some career stability to an uncertain profession. Joe's point is spot on, that we can not make assumptions about the quality of other people's work. As a union, we should simply offer our total support to the very best of our ability.
This includes raising standards and barriers for entry to the profession. A pilot can get in trouble faster in a B1900, or E120, than they can a 777. The size and percieved quality of the job should make no difference in the level of representation afforded an ALPA member.
I'm not sure I support all of Joe's methods, but he is spot on that discrimination within our union is poision to the profession.
~~~^~~~