AS Furlough Mitigation

AKMD80GUY

Angle Lakes Bitch
Joined
May 3, 2005
Posts
200
Total Time
10,000
The ink isn't even dry and here comes the camel sticking his nose into the tent. In an effort to prevent additional furloughs and downgrades, the company out of the kindness of their heart, has offered us a way to POSSIBLY reduce furloughs and downgrades by significantly adjusting section 25. These adjustments will be in the form of major changes to the QOL and pay sections to our contract. All these changes DO NOT guarantee that these furloughs will not happen.

As with anything that requires a vote, I ask that you read the whole document. This is changing the lives of the entire group to again possibly save a very few. And anyone that thinks furloughs are coming hasn't been paying attention to the fact that we can't staff the airline. When the CP is sending out letters begging for pilots to fly overtime, you know there is a problem.

This last contract passed by 84%. It is time that the company AND the pilots start to live by that contract. Enough is enough. Vote NO. Get the 65 back first and then we can talk. We need to show unity now more than ever.
 

Mea25000

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 24, 2005
Posts
184
Total Time
6000
I think it looks pretty good. lines 75-80 max 83 RSV line is still 79 slight VSA change but who cares about that well some 62 year old but he is going to vote no anyways. If this goes through there will be no more furloughs. I fly 75 hours or as close as I can anyways whats the big deal help someone else out. This will be a close vote we have a lot of selfish people over here who will hid behind the "only 30 guys are being helped here" argument... sad.
 

Green Banana

Request Direct Honolulu..
Joined
Dec 16, 2001
Posts
566
What is wrong with it? All it will do is limit the amount that people can MAX out at. It will not change time off, Duty day, or QoL. As for the comment that it will not guarentee more furloughs, They will never agree to that. What if pax loads crash for some reason. No airline would ever promise that. This whole thing can go away if that happens anyway. Then the pilots that want to, can go back to thier whorish ways.

This program will terminate automatically if the Company elects to furlough while this program is in effect and both
parties do not agree to extend the program.
 

ImbracableCrunk

Unregistered Un-User
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
1,481
Total Time
6AM
Furlough mitigation? Nope. Never heard of it.
 

becket

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 4, 2001
Posts
722
Total Time
12000
The contract was JUST SIGNED. My guess is they aren't planning on those 30 furloughs anyway and want to scare the pilots into some short term concessions.
 

Baze

Kama'aina
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
Posts
445
Total Time
11000+
becket,

They are going to furlough. Make not mistake about it. They'll do it just to keep pressure on this pilot group.

With that said, as one with his head on the chopping block, I do not yet like the MOU that is going out to memrat to supposedly mitigate 30 of the 54 furloughs.

They want this pilot group to take a huge hit in QOL just to possibly/maybe save 30 FOs for the time being. Mgmt could come back, for example, and say they are going to furlough the 30 come January anyway.

There are too many strings attached to this furlough mitigation MOU. They are trying to get from us what they couldn't during contract negotiations. I'm not sure if we should give it to them, even if it's going to cost me and 53 others their jobs. I'm looking at this long-term.

These changes are supposed to be "temporary", but they will set a precedent and the company will want to make them permanent.

Plus, this MOU is going to do NOTHING to bring back the 60 who have been cut loose already.

Just some random thoughts... feel free to throw them rotten tomatoes at me.

Baze
 

Mookie

luckiest man alive
Joined
Sep 25, 2002
Posts
879
Total Time
6900
voted yes.

time for us to step up and show the 60 and soon to possibly 54 that we give a shaet about their plight. time to share the pain even if we are going to keep our job, keep our base, and some semblance of quality of life.

Mookie
 

mach none

wishin I was on a boat
Joined
Jan 5, 2002
Posts
669
Total Time
1+
The contract was JUST SIGNED. My guess is they aren't planning on those 30 furloughs anyway and want to scare the pilots into some short term concessions.

Contract has not been signed yet.
 

Mea25000

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 24, 2005
Posts
184
Total Time
6000
Yeah that is kind of funny why hasn't the company signed the contract yet??? Makes no sense to me
 

Fubijaakr

Seniority is Forever
Joined
Dec 7, 2003
Posts
2,537
Total Time
Enough
Regardless of how you vote EVERYONE needs to vote. This demands a 100% turnout.
 

Going2Baja

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Posts
1,258
Total Time
10k+
This is about unity. What will the ENTIRE group do as a whole to protect the ENTIRE group? Can we ALL accept a change to prevent even ONE furlough? I will vote yes. The fact that the SEA LEC voted no tells me a lot about SEA. They are about themselves. Do I think loosing second step sucks? Of course I do! But as a dues paying member I trust that my negotiating team did the best they could and this is where it took us. "Maybe" save 30 jobs? They way I read it, this will GUARANTEE the prevention of 30 furloughs! NOT including the additional saved by the early out (should they take it.) I personally was on the bubble. I think I'm safe now. May I get bumped out of base, maybe. But I will FIGHT to the last breath to protect the the ENTIRE group, and this includes the 60 currently held hostage on the street. I've done 5 years of furlough, and it did suck. But life goes on. Vote yes in this MOU and save some jobs & families!

Baja.
 

Mookie

luckiest man alive
Joined
Sep 25, 2002
Posts
879
Total Time
6900
Baja,

Beware of pidgeonholeing all sea pilots....or we may start doing the same to u.
 

ImbracableCrunk

Unregistered Un-User
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
1,481
Total Time
6AM
Dooplicate post.
 

ImbracableCrunk

Unregistered Un-User
Joined
Feb 5, 2003
Posts
1,481
Total Time
6AM
Baja,

Beware of pidgeonholeing all sea pilots....or we may start doing the same to u.
Good point, Mookie. Besides, we all know that all of the jerks are LA based. ;)
 

Baze

Kama'aina
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
Posts
445
Total Time
11000+
Pay no attention to them huarache sandal-wearin' surfer dudes from La La Land.

All kidding aside, next Thursday is a perfect opportunity for SEA FOs to attend the meeting for the election of the new FO rep. This is our chance to make improvements to our LEC. If you have the day off, go to the meeting and vote.
 

Going2Baja

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Posts
1,258
Total Time
10k+
Baja,

Beware of pidgeonholeing all sea pilots....or we may start doing the same to u.
I apologize...I should aim this at the SEA LEC. I know most of you are more interested in your snow blowers and lake boats than your protection of fellow employee's jobs and families. J/K...had to razz Baze a little!!

Baja.
 

Ih8AFYesmen

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2003
Posts
227
Total Time
.02
Let's not all get hasty and vote in another bandaid. Make sure ya'll read and understand the ENTIRE MOU. This MOU does NOT guarantee "no further furloughs". I don't mind dropping down to even 70 hours if it means that we will get everyone back/prevent further furloughs, but this doesn't sound good from what I've read so far.
 
S

Snapshot

With that said, as one with his head on the chopping block, I do not yet like the MOU that is going out to memrat to supposedly mitigate 30 of the 54 furloughs.

These changes are supposed to be "temporary", but they will set a precedent and the company will want to make them permanent.

Plus, this MOU is going to do NOTHING to bring back the 60 who have been cut loose already.

Baze
It says in black and white that it will save 30 guys. It also is very clear that, at the absolute longest, it dies in a little over a year. True, it does nothing to save the 60 already out there, that'll be up to us individually.
The lines will still be built to 83 hours. The only real QOL I see is that you'll have to work a little harder to find someone to trade with pilot-to-pilot instead of Second Step. Small price to pay to save 30 families, if you ask me.

Gotta say I'm a little surprised. I figured this would have a bare minimum of 30 yes votes. To think that you'd sacrifice your job so that VSA guys can still get 150% blows my mind. I applaud your thinking long term, but submit that this is a short term proposal that will help bridge the gap till the 65ers are out.

Cheers.
 
Top