NetJets has no immediate plans to furlough anyone.
Summary complete.
Much Appreciated! Still hoping for that call... ... ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NetJets has no immediate plans to furlough anyone.
Summary complete.
NetJets has no immediate plans to furlough anyone.
Summary complete.
Laughable.This is probably true, but the operative word here is "immediate". I hope nobody gets furloughed, but if it happens in NJ, I predict it's going to be a larger number and a deeper cut than any of the other fracs due to the size of the contract.
This is probably true, but the operative word here is "immediate". I hope nobody gets furloughed, but if it happens in NJ, I predict it's going to be a larger number and a deeper cut than any of the other fracs due to the size of the contract.
This is probably true, but the operative word here is "immediate". I hope nobody gets furloughed, but if it happens in NJ, I predict it's going to be a larger number and a deeper cut than any of the other fracs due to the size of the contract.
U going to take it gut?![]()
This is probably true, but the operative word here is "immediate". I hope nobody gets furloughed, but if it happens in NJ, I predict it's going to be a larger number and a deeper cut than any of the other fracs due to the size of the contract.
I purposefully used that term because saying we will never furlough is irresponsible.
Obviously, if NJA has to furlough is is going to be a larger number than we have seen other fracs do in the past. We are bigger than ALL the major fracs combined.
However, for the foreseeable future, I don't see it happening.
My version of "bigger" will be pct of flight crews and airplanes vs. any of the others. I hope it's not true, but I don't see any way NJ can afford to maintain a heavy contract burden in today's market. I originally stated that I though it would happen by year's end. Now I think it will be much sooner.
When it happens, what I will be curious about will be if NJASAP would be willing to renegotiate the contract prior to the furloughs to a lower pay amount that will keep more pilots on the property or if they will just maintain status quo and let the bottom seniority guys drop off. If they attempt to re-negotiate before and take pay cuts to save jobs, I'll eat my hat.
Guys ALL I can say is that if you are worried about your job take a step back and look left and right see those planes with cw and lx on the tails?
They will be dissappearing soon unfortunately
Best of luck guys from your friends at Jetblue
No I would not be willing.When it happens, what I will be curious about will be if NJASAP would be willing to renegotiate the contract prior to the furloughs to a lower pay amount that will keep more pilots on the property
You took the words right out of my mouth (keyboard?). Well said.No I would not be willing.
Here is why.
1. The planes have to move.... If they have to move they need pilots. There will be no furloughs in that case.
2. If the planes do NOT need to move ... You take concessions ... the planes still do not need to move ...
They furlough anyway... because ... you are not needed.
So we take NO CONCESSIONS and when the economy turns around ... the pilots are recalled to a Job with a Salary worth coming back to.
Of course any personnel change at NJ would be the largest - they are the biggest fractional by far.
As far as the relationship to the contract, I think you will find that FX's cost per pilot is about the same as NJ's. You will notice that these two companies are the only ones that haven't furloughed. Perhaps furloughs are based on company performance, not employee pay.
Concesssions are the dumb mistake airline unions have committed. Now they have to work to go back where they were decades ago.