Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

APAAD regrouping to challenge age 60

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Andy,
Some bonehead on the swapa forum is saying that all appropriations bills that were roled over to the 110 congress will also have all attachments including S65. I didnt think this was true, can you give me some ammo?

All bills die at the end of a session of Congress. The bills from the 109th don't roll over to the 110th. I can dig up some references, but sometimes it's just easier to let them live in their delusional world.

Perhaps use this: http://www.school-house-rock.com/Bill.html
And ask the bonehead what it takes for a bill to die.

Bottom line: new session of congress. Clean slate. All bills from previous session of Congress die.

Don't be surprised to see an age change bill introduced in the 110th. But any bill is unlikely to get out of subcommittee.
 
How about those that are capable of maintaining a class 1 be given the opportunity to continue to work?

How, exactly, does the traveling public know you're maintaining your Class 1 physical?

Remember, you self-certify most of your physical. That's right...your AME doesn't test you for headaches, depression, dizziness, occasional double vision, suicide attempts, blackouts, alcoholism, kidney stones, and dozens of other maladies or symptoms that each airman must self-certify are okie-dokie. All your AME does is check the basics (items that have an established acceptable deviation) and issue you the certificate. The FAR's make it pretty clear that you must self-certify yourself prior to exercising the privileges of your Airman's Certificate.

We cool so far?

Here's the tricky part. The FAA hasn't set minimum standards for some of the things we need to fly airplanes safely...namely reflexes and cognitive ability. There is no "minimum cognitive function" to be a Pt. 121 pilot. [Note: If there was, I'm pretty sure I'd be right at that minimum...] Each of us must determine if we have our "A" Game before we slip the surly bonds.

At some age, each of us will slip below a safe cognitive ability...or we'll die prior to reaching that point via some other mechanism. That is not an opinion. That is a clearly established medical certainty. We do not get sharper as we age...we get worse. All of us.

By leaving Age 60 in place, the FAA has testified that they feel certain that they can exclude minimum reflexes and cognitive ability from the FAR's, since most 59-year olds still retain sufficient mental skills. They have also testified that self-certification is a serious concern (and I'm paraphrasing here) because a lack of cognitive skills can preclude a human from detecting that they've suffered a loss of cognitive skills. John Kern, the former head of the regulatory division of the FAA, called it the "gray matter paradox". You gotta have it to be able to tell if you've got it.

Read a few reports from 80+ year old drivers who plow their cars through crowds of pedestrians, and you'll see the same theme, "I felt fine!", and "I don't know what happened."

Before you respond with "But we take checkrides!"...let me tell you that I was a Check Airman for 10-years, and I know I was never taught how to distinguish between a "bad day" and a "bad brain". And even if all Check Airmen were sent to "Cog-Screen School" to get smart, we still have the issue of self-certification 2,3,4,5 months later...at night...in bad weather.

"I felt fine!"
 
Great post, Occam's Razor!

Unfortunately, you're trying to reason with the same people who are suffering from the gray matter paradox. They are just not gonna recognize this as a valid argument.
 
Last edited:
Great post, Occam's Razor!

Unfortunately, you're trying to reason with the same people who are suffering from the gray matter paradox. They are just not gonna recognize this as a valid argument.

Sounds like you're trying to convince each other. Good Luck.
 
You don't know your limits

Sounds like you're trying to convince each other. Good Luck.

Flybynite, do you know your limits. Do you fly with a cold? Do you fly without your glasses? Do you fly through thunderstorms? Do you land after an unstable approach? I am sure the answer is yes to all.

I am also sure that you have no idea when to quit. You are the reason self regulated doesn't work. I look forward to the new medical certification you and your cohorts are bringing on us all with this new age limit crap. I am sure it will eliminate guys like you.
 
Flybynite, do you know your limits. Do you fly with a cold? Do you fly without your glasses? Do you fly through thunderstorms? Do you land after an unstable approach? I am sure the answer is yes to all.

I am also sure that you have no idea when to quit. You are the reason self regulated doesn't work. I look forward to the new medical certification you and your cohorts are bringing on us all with this new age limit crap. I am sure it will eliminate guys like you.

Because I want the age to change I am guilty of all this? Surely you can do better than that. Sounds like you are afraid of a more stringent medical. I would have no problem. I'm outa here, the playground mentality of FI is too much for me.

When the rule changes and I hit 60 and feel like continuing, I will. If at 55 I've had enough I'll retire then. For some reason having the option pisses off the vocal minority. No need to respond I'm gone.
 
Because I want the age to change I am guilty of all this? Surely you can do better than that. Sounds like you are afraid of a more stringent medical.

You're not guilty of anything! Wanting to fly as long as you're "able" is rational. The issues I'm raising are the inherent problems with pushing the limit. There are two that just haven't been satisfactorily addressed by anyone on the Change Age 60 side. 1. What is the minimum standard? 2. How do we self-certify our self-certifier mechanism?

When the rule changes and I hit 60 and feel like continuing, I will. If at 55 I've had enough I'll retire then. For some reason having the option pisses off the vocal minority.

Try to separate the bandit from the chaff.
 
Last edited:
Boy, you guys must be a real joy to fly with.

Personally I don't give a damm if they raise the age or not, but on second thought I'd prefer thay leave it at 60 so I wouldn't have to fly with the self serving twits that seem to dominate this board.

Just out of curiosity do you guys have the guts to express these sentiments to the older Captains you fly with? I think not.

What a bunch of loser's

Losers are people who cannot grasp the proper use of punctuation marks while insulting people. I just had "the conversation" with my last Captain (mid-fifties in age).

Feel free to shut your piehole.

PIPE
 

Latest resources

Back
Top