Makesheepnervus
Pheasant Plucker
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2005
- Posts
- 147
RJPilott said:Wow... look at all these theories here...
Now you guys want to deal in the facts?
Tell me why the Flight Data Recorder provided by the NTSB is too high to have hit the light poles.
Go ahead fellas.. keep making up excuses to avoid reality.
(by the way. .thanks for keeping this at the top.. getting ALOT of hits on my website considering its only been public for a few days. Alot of emails from pilots too asking me to sign them up.. who realize something just isnt right... but hey.. keep calling us wackos..for questioning out govt.. makes you look like a genuine redcoat...lol)
For the parts and numbers... full engines were found in NYC... falling over 1000 feet at more than 500 mph.. found under an awning.. without any damage to the concrete.. as if it was placed there.. (but im sure you guys will say it was "moved"..lol)
Engine on Sept 11, think it might have a part number somewhere on there? How about the landing gear at the pentagon?
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myphotos1960/wtcengine.jpg
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myphotos1960/wtcengine2.jpg
What an engine looks like when it falls from the sky...
http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myphotos1960/engine2.jpg
It looks like the engine in photo 3 is from the lockerbie disaster, if so keep in mind that in that case the aircraft and engine literally did fall from the sky. Now, keep in mind that in the WTC attacks the aircraft did fly at high speed into the buildings but would have DE-CELERATED during the impacts, the impact would have progresively destroyed the front fan assembly, ripped off the nacelle, and the low pressure by-pass sections leaving just the high pressure core that you see in the photo's this would have then fell at a substantially reduced velocity, likely not greater than unaccelerated terminal velocity of approx 120 mph and impacted the ground, creating the small impact crater that you see below the engine in photo 1. keep in mind that what you see is a fairly solid mass of titanium and other high strength, temperature resistant alloys.
But don't take my word for it, why don't you ask an experienced investigator from the NTSB, or perhaps an engineer from Boeing, GE or Rolls Royce with experience in accident investigation.
Not that any investigation is required in this case as we have how many clear videos of the aircraft hitting the buildings? Not to mention how many tens of thousands of eyewitnesses? So why would it be neccesary to "place" an engine at the scene?
Last edited: