Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Anyone ever seen this site? Pilots For Truth

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
RJPilott said:
What.. no one wants to talk about this one anymore?


Eventually, one gets tired of beating their head against the same wall over and over, when it becomes obvious that the wall isn't going to budge
 
Thats understandable... however, not one of you have beat your head yet (havent addressed the FDR), you've only been running around the room stomping your feet and slamming doors (painting with a broad brush, confusing positions of questioning govt theory in the same category as Conspiracy Theory "lunatics", when no one has offered theory here.. etc).

Are you guys telling me the FDR data from the NTSB is fake and part of a conspiracy theory "lunatic" group?

Again, (if you havent been paying attention) the FDR data provided by the NTSB is in direct conflict with the official story that the govt has told you. The NTSB and FBI refuses to comment. It is being broacast on several radio shows. Just thought some of you pilots might like to know... (other pilots are already working on it).

This is not theory.. this is fact.
 
Any one know what VNE is on a 757?
 
Peak Oil, 9/11, War on Terror- Are they connected?

I don't know. There are a lot of unanswered questions though.

Watch this Peak Oil, 9/11, War on Terror documentary and tell me what you think:
GOOGLE VIDEO

I actually think 9/11 may have been allowed to happen at best so that we could use the "War on Terror" as a PROPAGANDA tool to control the middle east oil AFTER the oil resources begin to dwindle in the very near future.

Since I think peak oil will be such a big deal, I actually support our domination of the oil, since our leaders are taking us that direction. They must believe studies from the Department of Energy that say that alternatives can't replace oil as fast as it depletes to avoid serious economic troubles.

So for our country to remain the sole superpower, we must win these wars, even if they are morally very wrong. I find myself becoming more of a neo-con every day.

Jet
 
Last edited:
Peak Oil, 9/11, War on Terror- Are they connected?

I don't know. There are a lot of unanswered questions though.

Watch this Peak Oil, 9/11, War on Terror documentary and tell me what you think:
GOOGLE VIDEO

I actually think 9/11 may have been allowed to happen...
Jet

One of the few "enumerated" powers the federal government has, is national security and crimes against the federal government.

Conspiracy theories, negligence, whatever. Airliners sticking out of the Pentagon lead me to believe that not only is the federal government unable to protect it self, it cannot protect us.
 
Okay RJ, tell us exactly your idea of what happened on 9/11 then.
 
Okay RJ, tell us exactly your idea of what happened on 9/11 then.

I know what happened on 10/11, I saw it on TV! There was a bunch of fat New York cops on the ground of a gen-av crash, wearing kevlar helmets, bullet resistant tactical vests and brandishing German made sub-caliber machine guns. "Take that you little airplanes...brrrrrrrrrrrrrt, brrrrrrrrrrt! Hey Bob, I missed, you got any more magazines?"
 
Hey RJ, you can add one more celebrity to your list of 9/11 conspiracy believers;

ERIC CARTMAN !

From the latest "South Park";

Cartman; "So kyle, did you know that 1/4 of all Americans think that 9/11 was a conspiracy?"

Kyle; "So what? 1/4 of all Americans are retards!..."
 
Okay RJ, tell us exactly your idea of what happened on 9/11 then.

Perhaps you can explain to us why American 77 Flight Data Recorder provided by the NTSB is in direct conflict with the official story?


So far.. no one has been able to. Those that have been asked, such as the NTSB, FBI and Boeing, refuse to answer.

Perhaps when or if you sacrfice one of your family members in such a tragedy, you'll be ok with all the lies, holes and conflicts in the story the govt tells you. Others want answers.
 
Last edited:
And again, without trying to immediately trying to dodge the question this time, RJPilot.

Tell us exactly what you think happened on 9/11
 
And again, without trying to immediately trying to dodge the question this time, RJPilot.

Tell us exactly what you think happened on 9/11
The passengers were all retiring Secret Service agents. They are all living in a resort town in South Africa enjoying drinks with umbrellas in them.
 
Guys you have got to see the newest episode of Southpark, its all in there. Theres actually a government conspiracy out there that created the 9/11 conspiracy. There is no real conspiracy, it was the terrorists that did it.
 
Still waiting RJP for your version of what happened. Shouldnt be too hard, since you think the official story is so ludicrous.
 
Connect the dots people......

Take the red pill........

7 months before 9/11 Matthew Simmons, the Chairman for the Association for the Study of Peak Oil, spoke to Cheney for the TOP SECRET energy policy meetings. During these meetings it has been proven that Cheney was looking at the oil fields of the middle east with the oil companies. Why were the meetings secret? They realized the world was about to experience the energy crunch of all energy crunches. The meetings had to be kept secret at all costs. Our national security was at stake. All the nations of the world know about the coming energy crunch and what the U.S. is doing. Do you?

I actually support what is going on now because I think it's too late for alternatives. We should have gone the alternative route 5-10 years ago. Now we must go to war and we must win.

From the New York Times:

. "The Death Watch for Cheap Oil"
By PAUL B. BROWN
Published: October 14, 2006

THOSE falling prices at the gasoline pump may only be temporary. Indeed, they could signal the start of an era in which, forecasters say, “the death of cheap, abundant crude might unleash war and plunge the world into a second Great Depression.”

Peak oil is a reality,” says Willem Kadijk, a hedge fund adviser quoted by Bloomberg Markets magazine. He is just one of many who believe that global oil production is now at or near its peak, and the only place to go is down.

“Once the flow crests and starts to decline, and some geologists say it already has, oil will no longer be able to slake the world’s growing thirst for energy,” Deepak Gopinath writes in summarizing the argument. “The result will be the oil shock to end all oil shocks.”
The price of a barrel of crude oil, which closed yesterday at $58.68, “will spiral to $200 — and keep rising,” he writes.

Representative Roscoe G. Bartlett, a Maryland Republican, has formed the Congressional Peak Oil Caucus to draw attention to the issue. “The world has never faced a problem like this,” he told the magazine.

The nation’s oil companies dispute the assertions. An Exxon Mobil spokesman says the company’s geologists expect global oil production to keep rising for at least the next two decades.

ON SECOND THOUGHT If you think ethanol is a simple answer to solving our gasoline needs, think again, argues Consumer Reports in this month’s cover article, “The Ethanol Myth.”

“Despite the avid support of the Bush administration and major American car companies,” E85 — a commonly used blend of 85 percent ethanol and 15 percent gasoline — “is unlikely to fill more than a small percentage of U.S. energy needs,” the magazine says.

Reasons for the pessimism are that ethanol costs more, is hard to find outside the Midwest — only about 800 gas stations out of 176,000 nationwide sell E85 — and provides fewer miles to the gallon. The magazine tested ethanol on a Chevrolet Tahoe and found that the fuel economy dropped “27 percent when running on E85 compared with gasoline, from an already low 14 m.p.g.”

At the time of the test, the average retail price of E85 was $2.91 a gallon, which meant the 27 percent fuel-economy penalty would have caused drivers to pay “$3.99 for the energy equivalent of a gallon of gasoline.”

Jet
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top