Any SWA or Airtran pilots see recent SLI at Mesaba/Colgan/Pinnacle?

[Luv2BFlyin]

WRONG - they want our contract. Its ours General.... if it was so easy, they'd have a great contract too.... but they don't. If it was so easy, they would be working for a stong company too.. They were for sale, they were bought. It could be worst, AA or Delta could have bought them.

They are lucky, more lucky then you or I ever could be.... they get drafted into the best job in aviation where you and I had to interview.

Corndog Cocky! I like it.

Careful Cocky Corndog, you might pull something patting your self on the back. I'd wager that if we had your Mgmt, we'd have a great contract too and if we had your Mgmt, we'd be working for a strong company too. This has so little to do with you and so much to do with the Company you work for. I hope that if this goes to arbitration, the panel takes into account the only difference in the work groups is the mgmt styles of our bosses. It won't take much to realize the only difference between a WN pilot and every other pilot (including the regionals and international operators), is their Mgmt. At any other company, SWAPA would be no better than ALPA, IBT, APA, etc.

 

[General Lee]

I guess GK moved the WN F/O's cheese

Remember, you bought us, we didn't come into this position voluntarily. As has already been pointed out, the majority of us have never even applied there, let alone interviewed. But don't worry, we'll assimilate just fine, in fact, I'm sure GK will agree that the Trannies will handle this deal much better than WN pilots.

I agree. The Airtran guys will get a large bump in pay and choices in bases, but that is not because of the SWA pilots. Nope. It's because GK wanted to buy you. Some people think there are winners and losers in everything, and thanks to the high paying contract, I would say you have mostly winners, except some crying corndogs on this board. The SLI stuff is best to be decided by someone seperated from this whole mess, someone on the outside who can see clearly. Who could that be? How about an arbitrator? That would be fair, which is what all Southwest guys want, right? I would hope so, for the culture at least.


Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[General Lee]

Careful Cocky Corndog, you might pull something patting your self on the back. I'd wager that if we had your Mgmt, we'd have a great contract too and if we had your Mgmt, we'd be working for a strong company too. This has so little to do with you and so much to do with the Company you work for. I hope that if this goes to arbitration, the panel takes into account the only difference in the work groups is the mgmt styles of our bosses. It won't take much to realize the only difference between a WN pilot and every other pilot (including the regionals and international operators), is their Mgmt. At any other company, SWAPA would be no better than ALPA, IBT, APA, etc.

Hey, wait a second, ask any Corndog and they will tell you THEY ARE DIFFERENT. They didn't piggyback on any other contract out there (?), they did it all themselves. And remember, it's theirs, and not yours.

Bye Bye---General Lee

 

[General Lee]

Hey General/OYS- for entertainment purposes-

As another top tier airline, IF delta had bought Air Tran how do you think the list should look in the end? Please be honest.

Wave,

I'll take a shot at this. If Delta had bought Airtran, I would think any arbitrator would have looked at the differences in the operations. They would look at the sizes of the planes, the difference in routes, and the number of pilots. Longevity would be a factor (years of service), too. If you look at the NIC award for USAir, he put the top 500 on the combined list as all East pilots because they flew INTL routes with A330s and 767s, both larger planes than America West's 757s. Delta is a lot larger than USAir, and there are more plane differences too, with even larger planes doing INTL routes. I would assume, using that recent precedent, that a large chunk of senior Delta pilots would have been put on top of a list, and then it would have maybe gone relative or a ratio from there. That is just a guess based off of the recent NIC award. Maybe Ty Webb (737 Capt) could have been placed somewhere in the Middle of the Delta 737 Captain list, which is probably mid level Captain seniority. He probably wouldn't have been blended in with any 757/767 Capts or above, and the junior 757/767 Captain in the fleet would also probably be placed above that 737 group. Just a guess there. The NIC award, putting the top 500 all from one group that had larger planes that flew INTL routes, really did set the bar.

Now when it comes to SWA and Airtran, your missions are the same, and the planes are very close to the same size. Airtran does fly International flights, (and allnighters), but isn't as large as Southwest. Southwest is more profitable, but Airtran isn't a money loser, and not in BK like Frontier was. That would mean there could be a ratio. But, pay doesn't seem very important to arbitrators (look at Colgan vs Pinnacle and Mesaba), and that might be significant in your case against Airtran. SLI's aren't fun, but they must be fair if you want to fly with these people eventually and not end up like USAir--a divided group. That will hurt you in future negotiations and that famous culture will just go away.

All of the above is speculation, of course.



Bye Bye--General Lee

 

[Ty Webb]

Well, they DO have bellies with stars...

 

[MILF Hunter]

I hope that if this goes to arbitration, the panel takes into account the only difference in the work groups is the mgmt styles of our bosses. It won't take much to realize the only difference between a WN pilot and every other pilot (including the regionals and international operators), is their Mgmt. At any other company, SWAPA would be no better than ALPA, IBT, APA, etc.

That's quite an oversimplification! Yes our mgmt's have vastly different styles. But just as different is the business model, and it happens that SWA's has been able to create profits for nearly 40 straight years. No other airline in history has come close to that. All that profit meant more money with each contract. Over the years, the money, great mgmt and job security made SWA a very desirable place to work (albeit not for everyone). That meant MANY more applicants than jobs. That meant higher hiring standards and a very high failure rate in the interview.

I don't say any of this to explain that we are better than trannies. But it's just not accurate to say the only difference is that Gary is a better guy than Bob.

 

[MILF Hunter]

On the other hand, while I do agree that our mgmts' styles are vastly different, I can't help but think that so many of your senior pilots (many who have since retired) made a deal with your last mgmt when they all worked for EAL. They were welcomed to VJ when no other airline would take them. They proved they would fold for mgmt. As a result, mgmt treated them like crap and the contracts were well below the rest of the industry. Because of that, AAI was more than happy to get enough bodies to fill a class for many years. They hired pilots with qualifications well below that of any other major airline. And though the quals of AAI pilots did come up in recent years, they continued to hire pilots with absolutely NO PIC turbine as recently as 2008.

 

[Lear70]

Now we find out why you have a bone to pick with SWA

ROFLMAO!!! A bone to pick? Hardly.

Name ONE post where I've spoken negatively of SOUTHWEST. Just one. (here's a hint, you won't find one, just positive statements of Southwest's history and hope for the same in the future).

What I *DO* post is calm rebuttals when the incorrect postings get too far out in left field. My responses simply discuss the facts behind the merger; they don't get personal, they don't make threats, they don't level intimidation, and they don't call people out, unlike some people on this forum.

Just another case of "when you can't attack the message, attack the messenger". No more. No less.

 

[johnsonrod]

On the other hand, while I do agree that our mgmts' styles are vastly different, I can't help but think that so many of your senior pilots (many who have since retired) made a deal with your last mgmt when they all worked for EAL. They were welcomed to VJ when no other airline would take them. They proved they would fold for mgmt. As a result, mgmt treated them like crap and the contracts were well below the rest of the industry. Because of that, AAI was more than happy to get enough bodies to fill a class for many years. They hired pilots with qualifications well below that of any other major airline. And though the quals of AAI pilots did come up in recent years, they continued to hire pilots with absolutely NO PIC turbine as recently as 2008.

Thank you, Chuck Yeager. Quite an elitest attitude. BTW, I personally know 2 pilots at SWA who were turned down by Delta (failed the psych test). I guess those 2 pilots should hide in the shadows and hang their heads in shame for the rest of their lives because they are terrible pilots and clearly terrible people... Did you read Heavy Set's post earlier about how he met a former Morris Air pilot who integrated into SWA after being negged by SWA twice in the application process? That dude is probably your Captain now and most likely doing a good job.

By the way, the 737-700 is not the space shuttle. Get over yourself...

 

[General Lee]

That's quite an oversimplification! Yes our mgmt's have vastly different styles. But just as different is the business model, and it happens that SWA's has been able to create profits for nearly 40 straight years. No other airline in history has come close to that. All that profit meant more money with each contract. Over the years, the money, great mgmt and job security made SWA a very desirable place to work (albeit not for everyone). That meant MANY more applicants than jobs. That meant higher hiring standards and a very high failure rate in the interview.

I don't say any of this to explain that we are better than trannies. But it's just not accurate to say the only difference is that Gary is a better guy than Bob.

Same goes for Colgan and Pinnacle. Pinnacle had better pay, and Colgan had worse press (especially after the BUF crash and inquiry), lower pay, and zero jets. But, that didn't seem to matter to arbitrator Bloch.


Bye Bye---General Lee