Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Any new ABX info?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Register   Log in
A

ABXbooger

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 9, 2003
Posts
477
Haven't heard anything from the Q&A session last week. Any new info floatin' around?
 
was listening in, heard there was another session today, didn't hear that one, any news?
 
I hadn't heard anything about another conference call this week. Could it have been a Steward's call or e-board call just for those people?

I did hear that they added some additional meetings in CVG with the company for this week.
 
Rumored that there will be a super bid out very soon for the 76. Let the “trickle down” begin for the rest of the fleet. We might even have to, dare I say, hire somebody within the year……….
 
That makes sense. I've heard that the ANA flying will take about 8 crews per airplane so that's 16 crews. That will trickle down to being 32 DC9 F/O's and they say that they're overstaffed by 40. Add a little more for getting caught up in the DC9 Capt and both 767 seats and you've run through all of their stated excess.
 
new rumor has ABX owning the first IAI 767-300 conversion slots, not sure of the number. came from a groundschool briefing...also a replacement for the DC-9 may be in the works (737) according to some MX guys.
 
And you guys thought I was crazy...........me too.:pimp:

Quoted 3/25/07
While enjoying a luke warm cup of java at one of the outstations the other day the MX guys said their supervisors were at southwest going through 737 training. Hmmmm. Anyone?
 
With the demand for our 767-200 freighters it would make sense that they would look at extending it to -300s. Isn't the -300 more efficient on a cost per ton-mile basis?

I like that 737 rumor, it's got my vote! Sure would do a lot to solve our six-years-and-counting stagnation problem. There's plenty of parking lot left next to the admin building!
 
Is the empty lot for the new 73 sim. I bet we could trade the 2 DC9 sims in for one 73 sim. The only problem is how are they going to keep all the newly minted 73 captains from jumping ship to SouthWest..........
 
There's a new Japan Charter page on the flight department web site with info and pictures of the airports, etc. Talked to a mechanic who says that mechanics may be going to Japan as early as May 5th.
 
LJ-ABX said:
Talked to a mechanic who says that mechanics may be going to Japan as early as May 5th.
Click to expand...

Maybe they'll get serious about contract negotiations and we'll send some pilots over before the end of the year, too!
 
penguin22 said:
Hey they've changed the Pilot Hiring page too. Used to have "Not Hiring" posted on that page; now its gone. Looks like it may be getting updated.
Click to expand...

I've heard there will be an on-line application process. Last I heard there was no word on whether we would be accepting applications or not, but that was a month ago.
 
I still think Hete's waiting to get our new contract in place before any pilot hiring. So the new guys fall under the new retirement program. What do you guys think?

Looks like a big confluence of events coming soon at ABX. ANA, new pilot contract, and pilot hiring (finally!)
 
penguin22 said:
I still think Hete's waiting to get our new contract in place before any pilot hiring. So the new guys fall under the new retirement program. What do you guys think?
Click to expand...

I think that's a reasonable theory.

From my limited perspective, there's been a lot of uncertainty about staffing this year, ie: DHL pressure to reduce; DC8's how long?; How many DC9's?; ANA a domicile or ILN?

Result is we'll probably be short-staffed everywhere but 9FO's and 8FE's, but I don't think the company minds that.
 
I've heard about the possibility of a TA by this weekend, we'll see if it passes. Looks like the company is planning on the ANA flying regardless of a TA.

What does everyone think about the 23 days on the road for the ANA flying?

I personally think we are setting a dangerous precedent which might be hard to recover in the future. Unless there is a mechanism in place to ensure that only those who want to do the flying do it and no one is forced into doing it. I know the union is talking about language that prohibits a junior guy from being forced into it two periods in a row, but that still means a ton of time on the road, regardless. I value my time at home above all. I would accept a block like we have currently (17-18 days) but 23 days is too much. My 2 cents.
 
As far as hiring, anyone out there in the pool? I know there were people hired into the pool way back in '01, I hope they aren't still waiting. Thought maybe they would have an update from HR.
 
My .02 is that there should be a drop dead cluase in the ANA side letter. Not like the genius who wrote the side letter for the 767. If we are not careful we will end up with an ANA deal like we have on the 76 now. We have over 30 Boeings and we still have none conforming lines due to the original 767 "side letter." An easy fix to this is a hard number of A/C, crews, or months that the contract is ongoing. Anything over this "number" will force the company to meet "scheduling paramaters". I.E. once we have 10 767's or 20 crews or 36 months of straight service on an ANA Asian flight, all lines must conform to scheduling paramaters (15 days off a month) This way we have a definate date or number to renegotiate our options. This way we have the option of renegotiating the ANA deal. Note I said "option", that does not mean we have to but it give us the option to change something or leave it status quo. Renegotiations would then be based upon how the pilot group feels about the companys job of living up to its originally agreed upon contract (and we all know how well they do that)

Thanks for the time to rant.......
 
Last edited:
Box-Hauler said:
Not like the genius who wrote the side letter for the 767. If we are not careful we will end up with an ANA deal like we have on the 76 now. We have over 30 Boeings and we still have none conforming lines due to the original 767 "side letter."
Click to expand...
Let me let you in on a little secret... The only people who've been complaining about the 767 side letter are those whom it doesn't affect. Generally speaking, we actually LOVE those non-standard lines, particularly on a vacation month. If those lines were the crap that everybody talks about, they'd be going to the bottom of the seniority list. They're not.
 
The result of the side letter means that you have lines with more than 15 days off and you don't have to bid them back, right? I don't see any problem with that. I personally wouldn't be excited about WD days in ILN, but on the other hand you're getting paid for them, so again I wouldn't have a problem with it.

I noticed that the May 767 bid awards noted "owes X MLW days" on several lines. I thought those didn't have to be bid back?

RE: ANA schedules. UPS, FedEx and the legacies have fewer days away on international ops, but most ACMI's have about as many away with much less time off. Current ANA contract pilots don't have 23 on but they also have many fewer days off and commute on their own time as far as I know. It seems to me that we're somewhere in the middle. I agree that we may regret a contract that allows these same scheduling rules in other operations, or allows these same rules if the ANA operation evolves from intra-Asian routes to longhaul.
 
xspud said:
The result of the side letter means that you have lines with more than 15 days off and you don't have to bid them back, right? I don't see any problem with that. I personally wouldn't be excited about WD days in ILN, but on the other hand you're getting paid for them, so again I wouldn't have a problem with it.
Click to expand...
That's right. If you're a commuter, you get WAD days, but if you're local, you're home that day. So local guys like them even if its not a vacation month.

xspud said:
I noticed that the May 767 bid awards noted "owes X MLW days" on several lines. I thought those didn't have to be bid back?
Click to expand...
You never see "owes X MLW days" on a non-standard line. (The non-standard lines have a N/S at the bottom. For May they are lines 664-675) You don't have to bid back MLW days on a non-standard line. So on a vacation month, you bid a N/S line, they have 18 or 19 days off, and then 7 more days drop for your vacation, you end up with most of the month off. Gotta love those non-standard lines!
 
mega-bid (for us it is!) is out. 17 CA 17 FO's from 6/11 to 10/1. No september class, yet. This could get interesting...
 
Looks like we've entered the interesting part of negotiations. My inbox is filling up with e-mails about the compensation proposal apparently on the table.

Some say we're in line for a decent raise, others say virtually no raise based on interpretation of CPI's.

Some are claiming "no retro pay". That would earn a "no" vote from me.

I've been in favor of the ANA flying, but I fully support the position that there can be no ANA agreement without a full contract.

If you haven't been getting the e-mails, send some out and get in on the conversation.
 
xspud said:
Some say we're in line for a decent raise, others say virtually no raise based on interpretation of CPI's.

Some are claiming "no retro pay". That would earn a "no" vote from me.
Click to expand...
Anybody know exactly what statistic they've agreed to for COLA?

They could be using this...
http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/COLA/latestCOLA.html
that says its currently 3.3%.

or they could use this
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
read down a bit...
"For the first three months of 2007, consumer prices increased at a
seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 4.7 percent. This compares with
an increase of 2.5 percent for all of 2006. "


My .02?
COLA +1? I dunno. The no cap feature does nothing for me, we all know COLA is not going to 10-15%. And I can't imagine the eboard would agree to no retro. That TA would NEVER fly.
 

Share this page

Latest posts

Latest resources

Latest media

Carbon Cub FX-3 Shenandoah Valley
Carbon Cub at Kittyhawk
FX-3 in the backcountry
IFR Panel in a Carbon Cub FX-3
Cub-Provo-UT-c.jpg
Back
Top Bottom