Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Any "Latest & Greatest" About Atlas?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Im curious as where all this fantastic growth is coming from. It cant be from AMC because all the carriers that do this are downsizing now due to the drawdown. Is it mostly DHL?
 
Im curious as where all this fantastic growth is coming from. It cant be from AMC because all the carriers that do this are downsizing now due to the drawdown. Is it mostly DHL?

Good question. It seems like the training department has been running classes every three weeks like clockwork. We are still taking deliveries of the last one or two 767s for DHL that had been previously announced and we are still taking deliveries of the last four 747-8s. It seems like a lot of DHL growth which makes me nervous.

Atlas seems to hold their cards close to their chest. They seem to announce the actual additional airplanes, contracts, or customers at the last possible minute.
 
So a few months ago, our VP of Flight Ops, J.C. gave a big cheesey wink in an operational update video with respect to crewmembers being certain that our standing bids are up to date.

I had no idea what that was referring to but assumed some kind of meaningful announcement would come out about major growth or a merger / acquisition. As we all know, that has not been the case.

The question is: what was the point of that video? At this point, it seems quite misleading.
 
So a few months ago, our VP of Flight Ops, J.C. gave a big cheesey wink in an operational update video with respect to crewmembers being certain that our standing bids are up to date.

I had no idea what that was referring to but assumed some kind of meaningful announcement would come out about major growth or a merger / acquisition. As we all know, that has not been the case.

The question is: what was the point of that video? At this point, it seems quite misleading.

I know, wtf was up with that?
 
Good Ol JC! Gets canned from Spirit but lands on his feet at Atlas. Suprised he hasn't opened a pilot domicile in Kabul yet. Sorry for the hijack.
 
So he was canned from Spirit? I thought he just left....what happened?






Interesting points from the call:

Growth of revenue 13% over 2011 3Q.

10% Adjusted net income increase over 2011 3Q.

Good growth but not as much as forecasted.

Atlas has been increasing their cash position
-for rainy day worst case market scenarios
-to better position themselves for growth when an opportunity presents itself i.e. acquisitions of aircraft or competitors.

Atlas is increasing debt because of new aircraft purchases (747-8)
- goal is to balance increase in debt with increased earnings
- earnings are rising even faster than debt which leads to a better leverage position.

Global cargo demand is improving but not as fast as originally expected.

Military cargo demand is falling. This has a bit of a negative impact on Atlas, but a more significant impact on competitors using 747-200s.

Military contracts are a cost plus payout. Atlas 747-400s and 747-8s are in demand in the global charter market whereas there is little to no demand for the competitors 747-200s which will have to be parked.

As of October 1st, U.S. military will no longer charter 747-200s.

There are 42 747-200s worldwide in use that Atlas believes will be parked rather rapidly.

There are 11 747-400F's that are parked worldwide and are available for lease or purchase (CEO could list all of them and their former operators from memory).

There are 4-6 747BCF's that are parked worldwide and are available for lease. Atlas stated that these aircraft were not desirable as they have more maintenance due to their age, burn more fuel, and can carry less payload.
 
Last edited:
He was "asked" to resign. He has a history of opening and closing domiciles epecially when negociations are going on. Don't trust that SOB as far as you can throw him!
 
He was "asked" to resign. He has a history of opening and closing domiciles epecially when negociations are going on. Don't trust that SOB as far as you can throw him!

Although, I think he is very business savy, he was former Northwest management which by it's very nature makes him extremely anti-labor.
 
Although, I think he is very business savy, he was former Northwest management which by it's very nature makes him extremely anti-labor.

I'll take JC every day of the week and twice on Sunday over our previous VP of Flt Ops. JC has shown a willingness to at least listen to the concerns of the pilot group.

On a personal note, he took care of a problem for me when I couldn't seem to get any help from anyone else in Purchase.
 
I'll take JC every day of the week and twice on Sunday over our previous VP of Flt Ops. JC has shown a willingness to at least listen to the concerns of the pilot group.

On a personal note, he took care of a problem for me when I couldn't seem to get any help from anyone else in Purchase.

Yeah, he isn't anything close to the ****************************** level as the other "jc"
 
All right, reality check. Just where will the training of 400-500 pilots take place? They have enough trouble training 12 pilots every three weeks. So a 52 week year, with a class every three weeks is 17 classes a year. In a perfect world, 204 pilots a year max for the 744. With 39 or so pilots retiring, that makes 160ish. We are also losing one a month to greener pastures. Now down to 150ish. That doesn't even include any medicals, again about one a month.

Now, start thinking about the increase in recurrent training required by the increase in overall numbers and there just isn't enough time in the day to get reccurrent done and new hire training.

Now, with the 767 program, we are still stuck leasing sims, so I think those numbers are even more limited.

I have heard the same story but the numbers don't work.
 
I think they're looking at farming out training Johnny, like they did on the 767 program. I could be totally wrong though, just what I've heard from the old rumor mill. You know how that goes.
 
All right, reality check. Just where will the training of 400-500 pilots take place? They have enough trouble training 12 pilots every three weeks. So a 52 week year, with a class every three weeks is 17 classes a year. In a perfect world, 204 pilots a year max for the 744. With 39 or so pilots retiring, that makes 160ish. We are also losing one a month to greener pastures. Now down to 150ish. That doesn't even include any medicals, again about one a month.

Now, start thinking about the increase in recurrent training required by the increase in overall numbers and there just isn't enough time in the day to get reccurrent done and new hire training.

Now, with the 767 program, we are still stuck leasing sims, so I think those numbers are even more limited.

I have heard the same story but the numbers don't work.

All true if one makes the assumption that nothing can possible change with the training department. If Atlas wanted to grow to 1400 or 1500 pilots in one to two years, they could do it. It does seem like a pie in the sky scenario (as does almost every Atlas rumor), but it is certainly attainable.
 
Atlas Hiring.

Looking for some gouge on the Atlas interview,cked Emerald Coast they had no information.Any recommendations Cape.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top