Ok I gotta ask. Now I'm taking what you said above as being true since you were part of the mec at the time and were somewhat involved in the process. If as you say, the MC and a portion of the mec believed strongly that Gary was threatening the entire pilot group with the loss of jobs, then why did the mec vote 7-1 against sending out SL9 for ratification?
Did they have time to think about it for the next several weeks after the agreement was reached and thought "Nah he's bluffing" Did they review the hidden infrared camera focused on Gary and realized the color hues suggested he was bluffing. Did they see Gary wink at Mike VdV and thought "ah ha.. we gotcha"! Just curious. What was it? I mean after all you, a then member of the mec, granted not a voting member, but nevertheless a member of the mec comes on a public forum and says that a portion of the mec and mc strongly believed that jobs were threatened, yet they still said no thanks to the offer. Phew.. That's just overwhelming.
I'll tell ya T. You know where the mec and mc messed up? If you're gonna say no. Fine say no, but follow it through to the end. Don't go out again and bring back another agreement that is worse than the first and then vote unanimously to send it out for a vote. That's where we messed up son. Everything else is just semantics.
I wasn't a member of the MEC, either voting or non-voting. You'll have to talk to the people who were.