YGTBSM....
Braniff matched your fares and would have put you out of business. You had them thrown off "your" airport. The WA was written to save you. No airline's BK has ever been as one sided as the deal SWA got with the WA.
Holy crap! What have YOU been smoking? How do you say (while keeping a straight face) that the Wright Amendment "was written to save [us]"? Is that straight out of the AA Political Lobbying playbook? Do you even know what the Wright Amendment is?
A little history: After all the meritless legal attacks were settled (with prejudice, I might add) in SWA's favor, and the other airlines couldn't stop us from flying out of Texas (when deregulation happened), THEN, and only then, did Jim Wright (D-Ft Worth) sneak in his amendment designed to cripple us. It was designed solely to
keep us from competing with airlines at DFW in general, and AA in particular (you know, Wright's FW "hometown" airline). We didn't ask for it, we didn't want it, and we sure as heck didn't like it. It's been a thorn in our side, and hurt our Dallas operation for over 30 years. Only two and a half more years, however, and we can do what we want at Love Field.
Also, what are you talking about with "our BK"? Southwest has never been in bankruptcy. We've made an annual profit every year since 1973.
As near as I can tell, only one thing you said was actually true: Braniff matched our fares at one point. Check. We fought back with the "liquor with a full price ticket" battle plan. No one got "thrown off our airport."
Ever. Lots of folks (American and Continental included) have operated out of Love Field over the years, and still do.
Would you care to explain WHY you think the WA could possibly have helped us? Or why AA and DFW's Congressional Representative (Wright) would have written a law to help the "enemy"? Or for that matter, where you're getting your so-called "facts"?
Bubba