It has much of what the APA initially proposed. AMR has modified the original proposal to keep the Eagle cost structure.
Some benefit to AMR.
Some benefit to APA.
VERY LITTLE benefit to the pilots of Eagle.
For all intents and purposes, it is an extention of the CURRENT flow-thru (at even a more reduced rate). It puts us AT GREAT RISK once we relinquish OUR flying.
Their is NO protective language for the Eagle pilots. We would be at the whim of the APA in the future.
BEFORE seniority can be discussed, there has to be IRON CLAD protections for us. Only AFTER a solid foundation is built can the issue of seniority be discussed.
The bottom line :
This "counter-proposal" is DOA with our pilot group.
Some benefit to AMR.
Some benefit to APA.
VERY LITTLE benefit to the pilots of Eagle.
For all intents and purposes, it is an extention of the CURRENT flow-thru (at even a more reduced rate). It puts us AT GREAT RISK once we relinquish OUR flying.
Their is NO protective language for the Eagle pilots. We would be at the whim of the APA in the future.
BEFORE seniority can be discussed, there has to be IRON CLAD protections for us. Only AFTER a solid foundation is built can the issue of seniority be discussed.
The bottom line :
This "counter-proposal" is DOA with our pilot group.
Last edited: