" That's still better than what US Air or United pays..."
So, it's better to only be pissed upon... that shat upon.
Right?
"Substantiation by an accredited absence management vendor"...
We don't have language like that in our agreement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
" That's still better than what US Air or United pays..."
So, it's better to only be pissed upon... that shat upon.
Right?
You're right, and they will be called furloughed mainline pilots...sounds like it will take a LARGE number of new regional pilots to do all of this flying!
cliff
HSV
It seems like they have not taken the ATP rule into affect. How will the lower-paid regionals be able to attract new FOs who already have an ATP...sounds like it will take a LARGE number of new regional pilots to do all of this flying!
cliff
HSV
It may be better to end the company than to let the 88 seater get into the hands of the teenagers...just sayin.
You can bet that JO is licking his chops about another potential code share partner-![]()
Uh..Yeah.
That's EXACTLY what I was trying to get across.
( Once again we see just how sharp pilots are when it comes to abstract thought. )
YKW
- 84 Seat RJ's outsourced.
- Sick time re-payed into sick bank at 66% after a number of events.
Actually, it was 86 seats. Of course, you missed the part about only allowing 15 of them, and it was only done because it was necessary in order to achieve the holding company scope, which was far more important. We had none prior to this CBA, and SWA would have been able to simply take our assets and toss us aside if we didn't have it. Kind of an important item.
Well, that's just a gross distortion. Sick time always pays at 100% at AirTran, no matter how many events you have. If you get over 5 events in a year, then your accrual reduces to 4 hours from 6 until an event drops off, but if you have 150 hours of sick time, you can use all of it at 100% pay, even if you have dozens of events. The company is also prohibited from asking for a doctor's note or instituting any sort of sick policy. Definitely not comparable to AMR's draconian proposal.
Did I read correctly that AMR's proposal included getting rid of a monthly guarantee for line holders? If so, the argument can be made that this violates labor laws unless they then agreed to pay the pilots an hourly rate for all time on duty not just behind the yoke.