AA717driver
A simpler time...
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2003
- Posts
- 4,908
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hostage said:.... A 767 FO can make 160K at AA next year.
hostage said:Im not going to give away my secret because some senior guy will beat me out. But it involves selling vacation back. TTOT with ST. Bidding the nice trips and getting displaced and bidding lots of hours that you don't really fly. There is always some way around the contract. Thats the sickness that AMR and APA created. Im sorry Carty's ego bought TWA. It hasn't worked out for anyone.
Maybe management will get their act together but I doubt it. Between 2006 and 2010 AA will retire close to 1800 pilots. I think AE will suck all that up.
hostage said:AWA is feeding off our taxes for now.
G4G5 said:You will never see another Eagle Pilot flow through to AA main line again.
With 2458 pilots on furlough ALL of them need to be recalled before any of the current Eagle pilots with seniority numbers can excerise their AA seniority number.
AA717driver said:G4G5--You are right. Sup. W. says the only way a flowthrough can get on the property at AA is in a "newhire class". It'll be awhile.
G4G5 said:[B
How many of the Eagle pilots with AA seniority numbers were recalled?
Answer: Zero
Thats because they were never furloughed..(flowthru-guys)..
you idiot.
PacoPollo said:G4G5 said:[B
How many of the Eagle pilots with AA seniority numbers were recalled?
Answer: Zero
Thats because they were never furloughed..(flowthru-guys)..
you idiot.
Do you bother to read any of the posts? Read TCAS's post and you will see that he is claming that they have recall rights DESPITE NEVER BEING FURLOUGHED.
My point is;
If that is the case then the Eagle pilots with seniority numbers inside the range of the recalled AA pilots, should have been recalled. Or the Eagle pilots whose numbers are senior to current AA line pilots should have been recalled. Since, that was not the case and the precedent has been set. I doubt what he refers to will ever come to fruition
But................
His point:
He brings out an excellent point about the recent arbitration hearing that I was not aware of. Currently I am in the process of looking into what he was refering to .
Notice how he added something to the post?
Don't waste our time unless you have something to add to the discussion, "you idiot".
Originally posted by G4G5
Don't waste out time unless you have something to add to the discussion, "you idiot". [/B]
PacoPollo said:Im offended... I will get back to you some other time. Now Im off to fly the RJ on your mainline route.