Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Am West won't allow 190 regional flying

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Are they going to hire regional pilots to fly them?

Maybe it would help me if you told me what benefit YOU expect to get from that?

Meanwhile back at the ranch, 25 airplanes and 250 potential jobs will be "lost" at Republic along with 125 upgrades. If you don't think that's detrimental to that airline and its pilots, then I guess you haven't been around this business long enough to know which side is up.
 
All flying belongs to mainline pilots. They may choose to allow their employer to subcontract less desirable flying in smaller aircraft if they choose. But basically it all belongs to them.

How does flying "belong" to mainline pilots, you ask? Because of thei CBA and their SCOPE LANGUAGE.

Keep it in the family AWA!
 
Surplus,

I have not been around the industry as long as you or some others that contribue to this board, but I fail to see how 25 airplanes, 250 pilots and 125 upgrades are "lost" to RAH if those planes are scoped by AmWest because these planes are not there yet. Those planes at RAH would allow the rapid growth to continue (which would benefit me and people like me), but the same argument could be made for flying 737s, Airbusses, etc. The only difference is the E170 is at RAH and the 737/A320 is at mainline. RAH will continue to grow in the 70-seat market in the next 2-3 years, while some 50-seaters will go away. The growth *will* slow there, and while that'll make for slower upgrades, growth at mainline should allow for attrition upwards, which will compensate some for the slowing growth at the regional level.
 
PCL_128 said:
Oh, we're all paying attention Surplus. Some of us just find your propaganda more disturbing than the General's.

Father forgive them for they know not what they do.

A question though: have you not said in the past that you wear a platinum ALPA pin? If you are so disenchanted with that "union flag," then why are you involved with the Association at all?

You missed the connection between "Dixie" and "Union"; a play on words. I wasn't talking about ALPA, I was talking about surrender. Sorry to be so confusing, but thanks for paying attention anyway.

The platinum pin is past tense; I don't wear one, I once wore one. I'm not disenchated with the union (ALPA), it's the finest organization of its kind. I'm disenchanted with its leadership, which I believe has perverted its mission and misdirected its policies to the detriment of us all. I'm involved because I care about that.

It's much like my country. I love my country; I despise its current administration. That doesn't mean I want to destroy my country or become a citizen of another country; it means I want to correct the things I see as wrong and put the country back on a better course.

The same thing applies to ALPA. I think that 1625 Mass. Ave. has been occupied by the wrong people for way too many years. I would like to see them all replaced by a new breed of forward looking thinkers better equipped to deal with the problems of today and those of the future. I abhor the favoritism, descrimination and bad faith that has been entrenched for years. I seek reform and a return to an Association that defends the rights of ALL its members equally, like the ALPA I grew up in. I want my union to become a true democracy, not an oligarchy claiming that it represents + - 50 airlines, while it is totally controlled by 5 or 6 of them.

Now do you understand?
 
Last edited:
surplus1 said:
Are they going to hire regional pilots to fly them?

Maybe it would help me if you told me what benefit YOU expect to get from that?

Meanwhile back at the ranch, 25 airplanes and 250 potential jobs will be "lost" at Republic along with 125 upgrades. If you don't think that's detrimental to that airline and its pilots, then I guess you haven't been around this business long enough to know which side is up.

Surplus, while I agree with you just about 100% on how this whole mess (alpa) got started, Republic will not lose anything! They do not have the planes (yet) so how have they lost anything? The guys that will lose, the almost 1000 jobs at the division. They are losing their jobs. I think somebody being shown the street is more detrimental, than somebody not being hired.
 
My propoganda is more entertaining. And, it actually makes sense. The RJDC is full of lazy pilots who want more without having to interview for it. ALPA has a few problems, but without them we would have been $crewed even more a long time ago. Look, you don't see the Regional airline pilots dropping ALPA, do you? They just complain about them, but still NEED their help and the financial backing in case of a strike. Hey, I paid up when Comair went on strike, and look what that brought us......A whole lotta thanks. I am glad the AWA pilots figured out that the CHQ E190s should be left to mainline. Where will the line be drawn? Not sure in this Chap 11 environment, but most pilots already know the answer, and the few that are giddy about it know they would bust any interview.



Bye Bye--General Lee
 
One big problem though Surplus: the reforms that you would like to see would destroy the Association. Eliminating scope as we know it and allowing "bidding" on all flying is the scariest thing I can imagine for this profession. You should listen to GogglesPisano. He has it right. The flying (code) is owned and controlled by the mainline pilot groups just as it should be. The AWA pilots are putting their foot down, and not a moment too soon.
 
GogglesPisano said:
All flying belongs to mainline pilots. They may choose to allow their employer to subcontract less desirable flying in smaller aircraft if they choose. But basically it all belongs to them.

Congratulations, you win the mythology award. Fact is NO flying belongs to either mainline pilots or regional pilots. The flying belongs to the Company.

Mainline pilots chose voluntarily to negotiate away the flying that they once had exclusive access to. They sold part of their house when they really didn't need to and they moved to what they saw as a bigger and better house in the same neighborhood. They were wrong. However, the house they once owned is not longer theirs.

It is now occupied by a different family, which has as much right to occupy it as they once did. The new family aren't tenents, they bought their share before they moved in. If that new family can improve its status by upgrading its house, it has a right to do so and they have nothing to say about it.

They should have thought about the reality of the neighbors improving their property and eventually competing with them for dominance of the neighborhood before they sold. They didn't and that's too bad.

How does flying "belong" to mainline pilots, you ask? Because of thei CBA and their SCOPE LANGUAGE.


Their scope language is not a problem as long as it is confined to the protection of their own house. When it attempts to control the house of their neighbor, then it is out of line and will be useless.

As it turns out, their "scope language" has been less than adequate and devoid of any imagination. Attempts to expand it so as to create new advantages for them or recover what they already gave away can only be accomplished at the expense of their neighbor's rights. They even attempt to encompass the property of neghbors that is not attached to and does not adjoin their own. Both efforts are illegal and invalid.

Management now has an advantage. It can negotiate to give its flying to the lowest bidder, and that is exactly what it is doing. The exclusivity that the mainline once had, has already been bargained away. As they seek to bargain it back they will now have to deal with the equal bargaing rights of the competitor that they themselves created. It's open for grabs.

One man's garbage is another man's truffles. The mainline pilots should have thought of that. They didn't and now that they are hungry themselves, they want the garbage back.

Too little and too late. The EMB190 will go to whoever provides the best advantage for the Company. Pilots on both sides of the fence will lose in the process.

That is merely the natural outcome of a disastrous policy on the part of our union.

Keep it in the family AWA!

What family?
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top