Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tranny MEC, get smart.
From the AT merger update today:
In addition, Dan Katz, SWAPA counsel Jeff Freund, mediator Dana Eischen, and Southwest Airlines Senior Labor Counsel Joe Harris conferred multiple times via teleconference during the week to discuss various mediation and arbitration schedules. During the exchanges, SWAPA pushed for a delay in the arbitration proceedings, which we opposed. Southwest management offered to extend by up to three months their previously stated desire to conclude the arbitration process by December 31. In the end, the arbitration board accepted our position that the following twelve hearing dates should remain in place: October 11-14, November 14-17, and December 13-16. The parties also agreed to reserve January 31 through February 2 for additional arbitration sessions, if necessary. Arbitration hearings will take place in Washington, with times and places to be determined.
So if the lists aren't merged, this whole SLI issue goes away? Hmmm. That's what I've been saying for several days.
Don't kid yourself into thinking that the lists HAVE to be merged. Plan B may be more expensive in the short term but from all external appearances, that's the direction where this ship appears to be sailing.
... I hear rumors that Delta's been Jonesing for the 717s. Maybe they'll give DOH if Southwest opts for Section 45 Fragmentation of AirTran??? LOL!
For those armchair lawyers, here's section 45: http://www.wearealpa.org/about/adminmanual/Section_045_Merger_and_Fragmentation_Policy.pdf
This quote comes from a guy who once said: "Age 65 WILL NOT happen.".
Remember that gem, Andy?
This quote comes from a guy who once said: "Age 65 WILL NOT happen.".
Remember that gem, Andy?
I dont believe ALPA will let them or even wants them to get integrated. This has become more about ALPA's interests than AT pilots.
Nice fact free post.
ROTFLMAO! You're completely wrong. I fought 65 as hard as I could. So now you're blaming me for age 65? Hilarious. I sent out hundreds of PMs to people with predrafted letters to send to their Congressmen. My inbox is still loaded with some of the responses.
Do a search. Here, find one post of me stating that age 65 WILL NOT happen: http://forums.flightinfo.com/search.php?searchid=2817104&pp=25&page=14
Here are a few random posts:
http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?p=383501&highlight=age#post383501
http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?p=462593&highlight=age#post462593
http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?p=831940&highlight=age#post831940
http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?p=1088547&highlight=age#post1088547 (Note: HR 65 died with the end of the 109th Congress; it never left subcommittee) The 110th Congress passed age 65.
http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?p=1127881&highlight=age#post1127881
http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?p=1318455&highlight=age#post1318455
http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?p=1475286&highlight=age#post1475286
I find it humorous how you could say that I said that age 65 would never change. I made it my mission to fight age 65 for four years. I lost. And now that it's had a negative effect on your career - just as I warned it would - you're trying to put the exact opposite words in my mouth. Nice.
You're sharp as a bowling ball.