Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An agreement to an arbritrated SL was made if negotiations would not work (which rarely if ever work). Why is SWAPA backtracking on the agreement?
It seems to me SWAPA is trying to bully AT pilots to force them into an unfair list. Why the fear mongering? Why is SWAPA afraid of arbitration? Don't understand.
An agreement was reached with SWA, SWAPA and AT ALPA. Why not follow it? Arbritation time should be coming soon--just get it done! ALPA is following the process and timeline. Again, why does SWAPA fear a fair integration?
Was the red book,green book an arbitrated settlement? (northwest/republic)
Was that fair? Were the Republic pilots happy with that? Those were two ALPA carriers,right? I mean it doesn't go any smoother and fairer when two ALPA carriers merge. Please fill in those of us with fuzzy memories as to the Republic/Northwest merger.
Originally Posted by UALX727
From the AT merger update today:
In addition, Dan Katz, SWAPA counsel Jeff Freund, mediator Dana Eischen, and Southwest Airlines Senior Labor Counsel Joe Harris conferred multiple times via teleconference during the week to discuss various mediation and arbitration schedules. During the exchanges, SWAPA pushed for a delay in the arbitration proceedings, which we opposed. Southwest management offered to extend by up to three months their previously stated desire to conclude the arbitration process by December 31. In the end, the arbitration board accepted our position that the following twelve hearing dates should remain in place: October 11-14, November 14-17, and December 13-16. The parties also agreed to reserve January 31 through February 2 for additional arbitration sessions, if necessary. Arbitration hearings will take place in Washington, with times and places to be determined.
I do not have a dog in this fight but that name would have me checking my six if I was SWA FO. If there is a more experienced smarter labor attorney around I have not heard of them.
It was fair per the arbritrator--probably fairer than could be agreed upon by either side.
One side had wide bodies, the other didn't. This led to fences off of the widebody equipment. Other than that, it was a DOH merger.
Sure there was animosity on both sides, which is probably a good indication it was somewhere in the middle.
Does this answer your questions?
My bud at SWA tells me that Dan Katz wasn't AAI's first choice either, it was Jeff Freund but SWAPA already had him on retainer.
I do not have a dog in this fight but that name would have me checking my six if I was SWA FO. If there is a more experienced smarter labor attorney around I have not heard of them.
Dan Katz was the third and basically last choice in the pilot seniority integration game.
He got a great deal for the JA guys in the JA/AS merger.
You wish.