Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OK - admittedly, I can not win this debate, this is not about logic for a lot of folks. But, if you read the RJDC's publications you get their positions.Actually, I think it's the other way around. Joe's positions are exactly representative of the plaintiffs and the officers of the RJDC (remember, Joe was an RJDC officer at one point). It's your positions that were always too common-sense and reasonable for the real RJDC blowhards. Joe is just showing everyone what the RJDC was really all about: "me, me, me, me, me!!!!!"
What someone puts out in a public document isn't always representative of their real opinions and motivations. They were playing a PR game, and openly stating their true hard-line positions would have limited donations to coming only from radicals like Joe.But, if you read the RJDC's publications you get their positions.
\
This is really academic at this point..... The APA wants a single list without the Eagle pilots..... They are looking out for their best interests, and it would behove everyone to take this approach..... Nobody else is looking out for you.... only you can do that.....
OK, agreed, law of the jungle is effective and practiced in most jurisdictions. But, wasn't that what the RJDC was trying to fix?The APA wants a single list without the Eagle pilots..... They are looking out for their best interests, and it would behove everyone to take this approach..... Nobody else is looking out for you.... only you can do that.....
...and I heard E L V I S was out Christmas Shopping at Lenox.What someone puts out in a public document isn't always representative of their real opinions and motivations. They were playing a PR game, and openly stating their true hard-line positions would have limited donations to coming only from radicals
...the people that control the code that you fly: the mainline pilots.
That's the whole problem. I did look at his actions. I saw a lawsuit that that would have bankrupted the Association. There was no legitimate reason whatsoever to include billion-dollar monetary damages in a lawsuit if the goal was truly about representation. I also saw his fellow RJDC officers talking publicly in ways that clearly indicated that their goal was other than honorable. Not sure if you've ever spent time on the national webboards, but I still remember years ago when John B. was an RJDC officer going on the national web boards and ranting and raving all kinds of anti-mainline and anti-ALPA garbage. Dan Ford frequented those boards, and he had every opportunity to disavow John's comments, but he never did.Not only look at their words, but also their actions.
At times, I thought Dan Ford should have got involved in political issues - he kept out of all of that stuff and remained focused on the representational issue.