Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Alaska or United?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
If you'd like a non-divided work group, a desire to not be accused of being a scab even though you weren't born yet, you don't get off of grievance wins for crew meals, and you'd like to not feel like you're in a Salem witch hunt, go to Alaska. :beer:

You are an angry man Ex. I've run into and socialized with many LCAL and mixed crews in PEK, NRT and TK North (non scabs). Everyone gets along fine and seem to be on the same page. Then there are the 10% from both legacies that play the martyr, (bit*h about the ISL, LCAL, LUAL, "we did it better than you" ...you name it,) that will be miserable no matter what. If you want to be part of the 10%, that's your choice.
 
Look at the reality of the competitive marketplace. Alaska is going to get destroyed by Delta in Seattle. Long term Alaska is a dying airline.

That makes the choice United without question.

United is the first U.S. airline to intelligently use the B787 to serve a secondary city in China. That is the future that you should be apart of.

......and SWA, WTF? 20 years to upgrade in a 737.


Typhoonpilot
 
Why this airline isn't still called Continental and based in Houston, I have no idea.
UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Airline internet site http://www.flycontinental.com/
FAA Designator Code CALA
Certificate Number CALA014A
Years In Business 76
Certificate Issue Date 07/11/1938
Operation Kind
1. DOMESTIC AND FLAG (PAX / CARGO)
Operator is doing business as
1. AIR MICRONESIA AIRLINES
2. CONTINENTAL AIRLINES
3. CONTINENTAL MICRONESIA AIRLINES
4. UNITED AIRLINES

http://av-info.faa.gov/detail.asp?DSGN_CODE=CALA&OPER_FAR=121&OPER_NAME=UNITED+AIRLINES,+INC.

And this,

https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5095/5403489143_39dfccb3c3_z.jpg
 
Last edited:
Left out all those important details.

Lives in SoCal... wants to move to either Seattle or Denver long term, could commute short term, no more than a year or two. No desire to fly int'l widebody, upgrade not important. Classes are within 2 weeks of each other.


United. 5000 retirements coming, giving you better QOL sooner. With a better schedule, you could live in SEA or DEN. UAL will give you variety in flying, so someday if you do want to try intl Widebody, you could. DEN is a UAL base, but SFO is also one that is commutable from SEA.


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
A decade ago, Alaska but today, United. Alaska is big question mark in many areas. At the end of the day, it's all about QOL and earnings. There is way more potential for that at United than Alaska. JMHO.
 
I heard it would be years to hold Denver at United. And commuting from Den to any other UAL base can be bad. Isn't Sfo notorious for not being commutable due to weather?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top