Lear70
JAFFO
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 7,487
Good lob...If you are going to send a contract to your membership you don't do so "with qualifications." If it can't stand alone don't send it.
15 year payscales? You got an $8 per hour raise but it's gonna take you 3 more years to get it so is it even a raise?
"at worst case we're back at the table in 3.5 years because of our 6 month opening lead." Say what? Tell you what boys, WN had ONE YEAR lead openings before the contract became amendable. That was September 2005! We're not even close to a contract. Total eyewash.
Before you guys ratify this I'd remember that AA and UAL are looking for 35% raises.
Not my fight but I thought I'd lob one in.
Gup
And the 12-year CA pay is currently $152.57. $180 an hour is a $27.43 an hour raise, or about 18%. Sounds good until you look at what COLA is for a 12-year CA...
COLA from the amendable date would make that $152.57 about $166.72 in today's dollars (3 years of COLA raises). So that new $180 rate is an actual 8% increase but it takes 3 years to get there.
Take your $166.72 an hour of what Year 12 pay SHOULD be right now JUST for COLA from the ammendable date, add 3 years of ONLY COLA increases (no real longevity increase, JUST COLA for 3 more years worked), and you get $182.17.
So the answer is no, it's not really a pay raise, it's COLA-neutral.
Last edited: