Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
most of the aai guys i've flown with thought aai wouldn't have been around in 5+/- yrs.
Hmmmmm, if this was such common knowledge, GK was hoodwinked by FL mgmt. If we were in such bad shape, why cause such turmoil to the precious culture when we could have just withered on the vine? Kind of a rhetorical question I know as all you WN guys are asking the same thing.
You will find many more FL pilots have a better handle on the golden rule than OSW pilots. I'm very comfortable with the idea of treating pilots of another merger the way I'd like to have been treated, knowing full well I won't get anything out of the deal and most likely lose.
most of the aai guys i've flown with thought aai wouldn't have been around in 5+/- yrs.
The last AT guy I flew said "The next airline we buy better get at least as big of a screw job as we got..." I think that's a lot closer to the sentiment I hear. All anyone really does is look out for #1, no matter who they work for. If you want to give away your seniority to be "fair", I'd respectfully argue you're full of it.
Not true. We were running 2 upgrade classes a month for at least 3 1/2 years in the midst of the acquisition possibility. Upgrading wasn't a huge concern. We weren't stagnated as SWA was during their acquisition of AT.
I remember thinking we should make it as fair as possible, and for me that was relative seniority. At least something to that affect. My opinion on this matter has changed drastically after the SWA/AT deal. Mostly how it was handled. Not cool. Taught me a valuable lesson. I won't be fooled again?oh no.