It's an acquisition staple is fair, the other option is unemployment.
Doesn't matter what you call it. The nature of a transaction is not relevant. A-M will decide the list if a negotiated settlement is not reached.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's an acquisition staple is fair, the other option is unemployment.
Convince me how relative is fair?
Gup
So you would make me an FO at the bottom of your list, but pay protect me at 275 g's a year? Hmm, you sure about that? BTW, we don't have 7 year captains anymore...but whatever. Good luck with that line of reasoning.
NWA/DAL were close to same pilot longevity, age, etc. Therefore relative seniority did make sense. Here there are two growing(both still getting jets and cities) but one has been around 40 years and the other 17. If AA bought SWA, I would also feel SWA wasn't entitled to relative seniority since it would be lopsided a 7 years capt at SWA going in front of a 22 year AA FO-yeah that seems fair. Pay protection and job security yes. Seniority no.
737 captain, meet 737 captain, you both brought the same to the party.
SWA is trying to buy AAI, because SWA needs AAI, you need AAI. Get over it. You are equal partners in your joint future.
Welcome to the party.
I guess Average Joe should have had the good sense and forethought to organize and protect himself with a CBA like Joe the Pilot did.Compare this industry to the real world. In a buyout hypothetically speaking lets say ( microsft buys apple ). Do you really think that all jobs would be preserved? Usually the aquiring company calls the shots. So why is it different for this industry. Your CEO ( airtran ) decided to sell your company. This crap happens everyday. The average JOE what he asks himself is ( will I lose my job? ) But Joe the pilot says ( dont F with my life and schedule and pay. ? )