CopilotDoug
Captain of Industry
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2006
- Posts
- 2,644
The ability to recall is a good thing and should be exercised when needed. It is a safeguard to unresponsive union officers. And most of all, it is democratic.
I submit that Recall is not a reflection of low membership participation, but reflection of a broken union structure. To point the finger at the membership is irresponsible and a sure way to increase disinterest.
Is a recall justified? If the membership says so...so be it. That's a democracy, right? The will of the people...period. It can be debated whether or not it was for the "right" or "wrong" reason...but that is inconsequential.
The membership can motivate its officers with participation, guidance, support, and direction. The Right to Recall must also not be taken away nor questioned.
What Recalls actually do is ensure motivated and responsive Union Officers, which will make the Union more effective to the benefit of the membership.
Why does the company care? If the Union is 6 months into a 4 year contract...they're obligation to the employees is the same.
I submit that Recall is not a reflection of low membership participation, but reflection of a broken union structure. To point the finger at the membership is irresponsible and a sure way to increase disinterest.
Is a recall justified? If the membership says so...so be it. That's a democracy, right? The will of the people...period. It can be debated whether or not it was for the "right" or "wrong" reason...but that is inconsequential.
The membership can motivate its officers with participation, guidance, support, and direction. The Right to Recall must also not be taken away nor questioned.
What Recalls actually do is ensure motivated and responsive Union Officers, which will make the Union more effective to the benefit of the membership.
Why does the company care? If the Union is 6 months into a 4 year contract...they're obligation to the employees is the same.