Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Airtran may not give up

  • Thread starter Thread starter jetdawg
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 30

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

jetdawg

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Posts
325
AirTran vows to push ahead with Midwest bidAirTran vows to push ahead with Midwest bid
Exec says carrier may extend Feb. 8 deadline for tender offer

By DAVE HIRSCHMAN
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 01/26/07 AirTran Airways will do "whatever it takes" to complete a buyout of Midwest Airlines, a top executive said Friday, despite stiff resistance from the Milwaukee-based company.
"We can't be persuaded to end our bid," AirTran finance chief Stan Gadek said, adding the airline is considering an extension of the Feb. 8 deadline on its tender offer for Midwest stock.
Bloomberg
Fuel costs were up 20 percent in 2006, AirTran executives said, though prices are coming down this year.

His comment came as AirTran posted a fourth-quarter loss, citing high fuel costs, fleet expansion and a costly promotion with the Wendy's hamburger chain.
But the company's full-year profit nearly doubled, marking its eighth consecutive annual profit.
The airline, headquartered in Orlando, said it lost $3.3 million, or four cents a share in the three-month period that ended Dec. 31. The loss was in line with Wall street estimates, and it compares to a $369,000 net profit during the same period in 2005.
The fourth-quarter loss came despite a 13 percent climb in revenue to $462 million.
Gadek said a promotion last year with Wendy's accounted for $1.9 million of the fourth-quarter loss. Wendy's customers could collect drink cups for free flights.
The quarterly loss comes as AirTran seeks to convince Midwest shareholders to accept its tender offer and merge the two carriers. Midwest on Thursday posted a profit and contends its standalone growth plan is better.
"The year 2006 was very challenging with our average fuel prices again rising over 20 percent for the third year in a row," said Joe Leonard, AirTran chairman and chief executive.

AirTran said it made money in November and December, but that wasn't enough to offset losses from October.
For all of 2006, AirTran reported $15.5 million in net income or 17 cents a share, compared to $8.1 million, or 9 cents, in 2005.
Going forward, AirTran has slowed new aircraft deliveries. The airline took on 20 new Boeing 737s and two 717s in 2006.
AirTran's $345 million takeover bid for Midwest is an attempt to gain a second hub. Midwest has rebuffed AirTran's overtures so far, however, and the Milwaukee carrier has numerous "poison pill" provisions it can use to block an unwanted merger.
AirTran costs surged 13.4 percent in the fourth quarter. But fuel costs have declined sharply in the last two months.
The airline's load factor — the percentage of seats filled by paying customers — fell to 69 percent in the fourth quarter from 71.5 percent as seat capacity surged 20 percent.
"We are encouraged by lower capacity levels in our markets and by recent declines in fuel prices," said Bob Fornaro, AirTran president and chief operating officer.
 
Gadek said," a promotion last year with Wendy's accounted for $1.9 million of the fourth-quarter loss. Wendy's customers could collect drink cups for free flights."

The thing that I find so interesting, these guys come up with these crazy schemes and cost the company millions of dollars. They keep their jobs and in some cases get promoted. The union needs a seat on the board so that when crazy schemes like this cost AirTran millions of dollars, someone is held accountable. If the company did an audit on our scheduling department, we would probable find they cost AirTran the other 1.4 million dollars that the company lost. But some how the pilots get blamed and everyone is told that our contracts cost the company money! BULL, it is incompetence and a lack of accoutability. Again AirTran lost 3.3 millions dollars in the 4th quarter but still made 15.5 million for the year. By their own admission we definitely could have made more. Where is the accountability? With a seat on the board, you can definitely demand one! This is why concessions should not even begin to enter into the negotiations with screw ups like this.
 
Last edited:
Fairly certain the guys that came up with the Wendy's promotion were politely escorted from the building, so to speak.

Yet, Tennessee Tad got bumped up to VP status...
 
That is a neat idea. Collect drink cups from a fast food dive, and redeem them for travel. No wonder I don't get paid anything.
 
If you factor in the excessive cost of the current sick call policy (KG) the Christmas scheduling snafu (JT) the escalating attrition due to the degradation of working conditions (KG, SK, JT, JL) and that Wendy's dumpster-dive . . . we certainly would have made a profit. . . . and that's not even touching on the revenue side of the house.

The fact that we are going to be paying 717 FO's bypass pay because of the attrition levels, that should be a message loud and clear . . . not to mention we even have Captains leaving!

Time for a corporate house-cleaning, IMHO. . . . . .


.
 
Last edited:
no, it's not all gold at airtran.??? No wonder ME does not want anything to do with them.Please tywebb, don't answer.....
 
Please tywebb, don't answer.....

Sorry, but I couldn't let your little piece of stupidity go unanswered. If you don't like my replies, maybe you should engage your brain before posting, or simply refrain from posting altogether.:laugh:

no, it's not all gold at airtran.??? No wonder ME does not want anything to do with them.

The reason MEH "doesn't want anything to do with them" is because the top executives of Midwest are in a fight for their jobs.

They finally had a good quarter . . . that's great, but less then two years ago, they were burning the furniture to heat the house, and their junior guys were recently recalled from years of furlough. A merger with AirTran would be a raise and a quicker upgrade for every pilot on the property at Midex.

AirTran has had 7+ years of profitability, all while growing at 20% or more each year, and the pilot group went from 600 to 1500. Yes, all is not perfrect here, but it ain't that bad, and when we get our new contract, it will be even better.
 
dats what UAL had, before.

I didn't say employee owned! I said a seat on the board for business purposes. It is time we pilots stop thinking like blue collar laborman and start thinking like the executives we are. We manage a very expensive piece of equipment and have a lot of lives in our hands. The decisions we make, managing our aircraft, the altitudes and speeds we ultimately fly at, diversions, weather avoidance, all the various safety issues, managing an entire crew, these are management decisions that affect the companies bottom line, HOW MUCH MONEY WE MAKE! A seat on the board allows your voice to truely be heard. You have a say in the direction your company is being run. When the company makes poor decisions, you have a say. In addition to fair wages, every pilot should increase their worth by being tied into the performance of the company with stock options, and profit sharing. I've worked for companies where the managements goal was their golden parachutes. Every crewmember on this board is vested in their company once they complete training. All I care about is a management team that is looking after my best interest. My interest is that AirTran remain profitable. If AirTran remains profitable, I get one more year toward retirement and doing what I love to do. If my union has a seat on the board, they have a say in the business which I'm vested. Folks that make mistakes and cost my company money, I have a say rather they stay or go! We have allowed airline managements all over the globe to take advantage of us. It is more evident everyday. Look at the lost pensions, lost wages, and all the contracting going on. The only way you control your future is to truely have a say and be able to do something about it. Whereever you work, your union needs a seat on the board! Think like an executive mr. pilot, not a blue collar worker and we may eventually be able to change this business.
 
Last edited:
The union needs a seat on the board so that when crazy schemes like this cost AirTran millions of dollars, someone is held accountable. .


I agree with you in concept, but it will never happen. Our current management would shut this place down rather than give up an ounce of operational control. That's the mentality down on Orlando and I don't see it changing.
 
Airline has been talking to Midwest's top investors
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 01/27/2007
Author: Tom Daykin
(Copyright 2006)


AirTran Holdings Inc. believes it's making progress in persuading the largest shareholders of Midwest Air Group Inc. to go along with AirTran's hostile takeover attempt, Chairman Joe Leonard said Friday.

Leonard, speaking to a reporter after the company announced its fourth-quarter earnings, said AirTran executives have spoken "numerous times" to Midwest Air's 20 largest shareholders, who together control around half of the company's stock. Leonard believes most of those shareholders are inclined to accept AirTran's offer of $13.25 a share.

Leonard said most of those institutional investors have not divulged whether they will tender their shares to AirTran before the cash-and-stock offer expires on Feb. 8.

But, he added, "We've got a very positive feeling from them."

Most of the institutional shareholders contacted by the Journal Sentinel since the takeover battle started in December have declined to comment on the matter.

Midwest Air spokeswoman Carol Skornicka said any discussion of whether the shareholders will accept AirTran's offer amounts to speculation.

"The real test will come on Feb. 8," said Skornicka, senior vice president of corporate affairs at the Oak Creek-based company, which operates Midwest Airlines Inc. and Midwest Connect.

When the offer expires, AirTran is required by law to disclose how many shares have been tendered to the company. AirTran also has the option of extending the offer.

Even if it falls short of a majority of the shares, Leonard hopes AirTran can secure enough shareholder support to force Midwest Air's board to negotiate a sale of the company. The board this week recommended that shareholders not accept the offer, which it called inadequate.

AirTran two weeks ago raised its offer from the initial price of $11.25 a share.

AirTran reported Friday a fourth-quarter loss of $3.3 million, or 4 cents per share, as higher fuel prices and other expenses overshadowed an increase in revenue. AirTran's loss, which compared with a break-even performance from the fourth quarter of 2005, was in line with analysts' forecasts. Revenue was $461.9 million, a 12.7% increase from $409.9 million.

For the full year, Orlando-based AirTran earned $15.5 million, or 17 cents per share, a 92.1% increase over $8.07 million, or 9 cents per share. Revenue was $1.89 billion, a 30.5% increase over $1.45 billion.

Midwest Air reported Thursday fourth-quarter net income of $3.6 million. For the full year, Midwest Air earned $5.4 million.

Midwest Chairman Timothy Hoeksema cited those earnings as proof that the company's growth plan is working, and Midwest shareholders are better off not accepting AirTran's buyout offer.

Leonard said comparisons between Midwest Air's quarterly profit and AirTran's loss will have little effect on whether Midwest shareholders decided to accept the buyout offer.

He said the company's fourth-quarter earnings were partly affected by rival Delta Air Lines Inc. adding passenger capacity in Atlanta, AirTran's biggest hub. Delta has since said it will reduce capacity at its Atlanta hub, which analysts said will benefit AirTran.

After its earnings were disclosed, AirTran's stock closed Friday at $11.16, down 34 cents. Midwest stock closed at $12.93, up 26 cents.
 
Well there's at least ONE good piece of news in all that. ;)

Lear70, if you think Delta reducing capacity in Atlanta which is your main hub, is good news, and you know that some of the 4th quarter loss Airtran posted was due to Delta increasing capacity in Atlanta, you should be VERY happy that your management is pushing for this deal with Midwest and trying to get a couple of other bases outside of Atlanta.

I do know very well where you stand in the merger issue, "and I don't blame you since I have been dreaming about the left seat here for a decade", but I also know the stronger the company you work for the more stable is your own job.

I am sure you see your management is pushing very hard for this deal, there must be a reason. Think about it.

I personally was one of the few who kept an open mind and was even excited sometimes about the whole deal but after our union last letter, I do hope for your sake and mine that this deal doesn't go through now. (not that we can do anything to change the outcome anyway)

Said that, I wish you guys all the best ;)
 
Yeah, I saw that letter - our MEC got it out to the P2P guys (I don't know why they never distributed it via blast email or posted it on the NPA site for people to see).

It was very interesting, especially considering it came pretty quickly after your MEC had a pow-wow with our MEC. Wonder if the Midwest MEC considered it a "negative" meeting and if that was any basis for the later change of position?

One can only speculate...

As far as us needing another hub; you're preaching to the choir. I agree 100%. I'm *hoping* that STL works out and we can do more West-Coast ramp-up with it.

I also like that DAL is backing off again. They lose big-time every time they try to match our fares (simply because of their CASM, which post-BR we'll STILL be quite a bit lower).

The combination of those two will, hopefully, make for an even MORE profitable year in 2007. Especially if we can avoid fast-food promotions, concentrate on a REAL and EFFECTIVE marketing strategy, and keep our airplanes out of the mud. ;)

I also look to see a lot more contract progress made 2nd or 3rd quarter. This time next year we might actually be working under a new (and more lucrative) Agreement!

Good luck to you guys, too! I'll support whatever happens (like you said, not much choice in the matter), and might as well make the best of it. :beer:
 
Last edited:
It was very interesting, especially considering it came pretty quickly after your MEC had a pow-wow with our MEC. Wonder if the Midwest MEC considered it a "negative" meeting and if that was any basis for the later change of position?

No, not at all, as a matter of fact here is what our union mentioned in the last letter:

"Midwest MEC indicated that the Midwest pilot group will continue to work with the AirTran pilots across company lines regardless of whether a merger occurs. “As AirTran pilots continue with their negotiations, we will help them achieve the best possible contract. Midwest pilots are preparing for negotiations next year, and every pilot group that achieves its contract goals enhances our collective strength at the bargaining table,” they said"
 
I had a conversation with Bob F. (#2) on friday night. He indicated this deal is far from over. I asked what our prognosis would be if this deal does'nt happen. He said we are not in any financial trouble and would continue with our business plan to expand. I think our flexibility is key here. If the medex deal does'nt go, we will move in a different direction.

Fletch
 

Latest resources

Back
Top