Airtran has reached a tentative agreement!!

[Lear70]

Hadn't heard that figure quantified, but I'm not surprised. Figure 20 hours of soft pay on average per month times the 150 F/O's and 150 CA's on reserve.

3000 hours * $47 per hr = $144,000 for F/O's per month
3000 hours * $120 per hr = $360,000 for CA's per month

Total per month, $404,000 * 12 = $4.8 Million per year, give or take, just rough numbers. Hadn't really thought it out before. Thanks for the clarification...

 

[Nindiri]

Can the company still urp and will it reduce the guarantee?

 

[jstarav8r]

The reserve pay system hasn't had as much soft pay since they started URPing us. So, if the rules are better, and I can have more days off, that's a good thing for me (6 year capt.) I did expect a better pay rate then what I'm hearing about though. That, coupled with the scope, sick, and vacation sections = huge disappointment. Also, the hostages absolutely need to return.

 

[WayBack]

98% of the pilots had authorized a strike, and time was running out for mgmnt. Pilots were ready to request being released, and the next event was the Strike Center opening.

ALPA would have told you to pound sand. Even they saw how embarrassing the Spirit strike was.

 

[Lear70]

No URP'ing. Period. But now there's no reason for them to, since reserve days won't have any hard credit built into them.

12 days off 6 months out of the year (peak travel months), 14 days off the other 6 months.

 

[Nindiri]

!2/14 isn't too bad. I've seen worse.

 

[Candide]

This forum over the past few years is littered with quotes such as this describing pilot employment with Airtran as a Bataan-esque experience:

You have no idea what we have been through in the last five and a half years . . . .

When someone who has been here for barely half of this struggle to get a contract, and hasn't participated in any meaningful way, starts telling me that if I don't vote for an agreement that gives me a lousy 8% raise and abandons one of our contract hostages, I'm stupid. . . . . uh, yeah, that does make me angry.

Ty Webb et. al.: Do you realize how schizophrenic this sounds on the heels of your demands for relative seniority?

I'm a mid-senior SWA FO. My career would never be described as a "struggle". Although I sit in the right seat, I make as much or more than you do. My work rules are great. Rigs are best in the industry. I trust (but verify) SWA management. I can make a lot extra if I choose. There's true camaraderie in the work force. Great hotels. My quality of life is fantastic. I, along with the vast majority of my fellow pilots, am a happy camper.

You have little to none of that...yet.

But you seem to think the upgrade and longevity you've accrued at your time at Airtran, which you describe by saying "you have no idea what I've been through", should not only propel you above me, but launch you well into the stratosphere of relative seniority with SWA Captains. Unbelievable.

I'm sure you don't actually feel that way, and your forum posts since the acquisition announcement are just digital posturing, but it still grates a bit.

Personally, I hope you guys get a great new contract that you would be happy with outside of the acquisition--for your sakes. Then I hope the acquisition deal gets called off--for our sakes.

I think that's the only "fair and equitable" solution that Ty and I would agree on.

 

[CMonBoard]

By the same token, Candide, is it your position that an Airtran pilot give up of their seniority in entirety and be placed just below you on the combined seniority list? Of course I'm being somewhat sarcastic because I am sure you don't mean that, though that is how you come across in your statement. If it doesn't go the way you want, could you still come to work, be happy, and have a good time at the overnight?

 

[Candide]

Cmon,

I want to be reasonable. I want us to eventually thrive together as a pilot group. I want the outcome to be fair. I want to fly with former AAI guys and have a blast. These are things that are important to the vast majority of SWA pilots.

I won't comment on a specific SLI solution, because I don't think that's a good idea. That said, we all worked extremely hard to get to SWA, and everyone considered getting here be the crowning achievement of our careers and the proverbial winning lottery ticket. Because employment at WN merits that reaction.

I simply responded to the relative seniority "you're the same percentage before as after" solution that I've read Ty and others endorse, which I think is completely inconsistent with vision of my first paragraph.

And I hold nothing against Ty et. al. for the posts. If we perceive that perhaps SLI negotiations spill over onto this forum (spoiler alert: they don't!), it's typical strategy to start with an unrealistic positive.

But this post is about your TA. I am serious when I say the ideal scenario is you guys getting a kick ass contract and then the two companies going their separate ways. I'd prefer SWA's growth to be organic (i.e. inherently seniority enhancing).

 

[Ty Webb]

Candide:

Thanks for a civil and heartfelt response, and I mean that sincerely.

I think that it is important to point out two things:

1) I am a ten-year employee who has been flying a 737-700 here for 6 years as a Captain in our airplanes, on our routes. Your company bought our successful and growing airline, and under existing law, the seniority lists must be combined. I did not ask for this merger, and I am not an interviewee. I expect to be merged according to current law and past practice.

2) I respect and appreciate Southwest's culture and I am looking forward to being a productive part of the Southwest family. I did not ask for this, nor did you, but here we are. I am willing to make the best of it, and I hope you are, too. I will not stand in the way of your upgrade or career progression, but I don't expect you to take away what I have earned, either. If my choice is to be an AirTran Captain in the top half of our list, or become a Southwest FO, well, my choice would be to remain exactly where I am. I'm sure you would prefer that, too . . . but we're not the ones calling the shots.

Regards,

Ty