Air France Flight Missing

[Dornier 335]

Originally Posted by Dornier 335

Well, there was precip around somewhere, mebbe not on your route but it was there. You may not have seen it, but it was there somewhere, no other way. But I'm not here to hi-jack this thread to argue with you and Mister Lear about basic meteorology.

Don't want to get off subject here, but I didn't post this. Thanks anyway about the info about dry lightning. Back to Union Busting ...errr I mean Met 101.

LOL! Religioninfo.com really exists!

 

[Whine Lover]

Now Kids, let's close this thread shall we?

Something VERY BAD happened to the poor Souls of 447.

There will be appropriate investigations (and/or questions ad infinitum ) and let's just hope that maybe we can all learn something from this horrible event once the facts are known.

Let it never happen again.... "God ( Insert Deity here ) willing" to any of us or our loved ones.

Good Night, and "God" Bless. ( Man, I am SO P.C. )

MKR

 

[goodgig]

I hope they can figure this one out, but I would bet that most of it will remain a mystery.

 

[30West]

The ITCZ was by far my least favorite part of international flying for reasons already mentioned above. Imagining what the Air France crew was up against is enough to induce night terrors.

 

[Crossky]

Lear70 A similar thing happened to me. Not a night, during daylight flying mostly in IMC at 37,000 feet. I had checked the weather before we departed - no significant echos, turned the wx radar on with the turbulence mode (Honeywell) - no echos, and all of a sudden a return pops up right in front of us (less than 5 NM) impossible to circumnavigate. Plane went into a couple 90 degree banks, icing, etc. It really scared the sh!te outta me.

What's amazing is that no echos in convective activity can put you in severe turbulence. I don't remember that part in Archie Trembel's (spelling?) radar course...

I think this scenario exactly is what AF447 encountered. According to this guy's weather analysis these TS in the intertropical convergence zone can have strong, narrow updrafts which are difficult to detect using weather radar. He theorizes that AF447 was first flying in moderate turbulence in the lefovers of old storms, and new cumilonimbus grew up into the flightpath. That's where the meteorlogist got the quote of 'they flew into a 100 mph wind', that's the updraft, 8,000 fpm if you're using statute miles.

My radar training at my regional isn't that great to be honest but they just gave us just before this accident a new radar handout and summer flying guide. About six years too late if you ask me. Anyway what I seem to remember about painting cumilonimbus growing from below while at high altitude: 1. turn up the gain, 2. make sure it's tilted down enough, 3. avoid even green returns.

 

[Lear70]

When I was just starting as a 727 F/O, we had to know more than ANY airline has ever asked of me in my entire career since. One of those things was calculating TIP and radar angles on the fly at any given altitude. It amazed me when I got to Pinnacle how they never taught JACK CRAP about radar usage and the F/O's would be all over the place with the tilt and gain until I just asked them to leave the radar where I d*mn well left it unless they could explain why they had it where they did (no one ever could and they didn't want to learn proper radar usage for the most part).

That said, airliners won't go very far avoiding even green returns. Sounds good in theory to some paper pusher, but it's just not gonna happen.

 

[PeanuckleCRJ]

Most airlines don't teach very much when it comes to radar, unfortunately. It's becoming a lost artform.

I went through one green echo on my first night flight in the ITCZ last summer. That was also the last time I'll do that.



Rant time, here: Why the heck can't we have a real time satellite uplink of radar and sat imagery?? The technology is easily there, it's not very expensive and freaking Cessnas have it and 99% of airliners don't. Heck on our PTV equipped planes the passengers have better "big picture" weather than we have.

 

[freightdogfred]

I think this scenario exactly is what AF447 encountered. According to this guy's weather analysis these TS in the intertropical convergence zone can have strong, narrow updrafts which are difficult to detect using weather radar. He theorizes that AF447 was first flying in moderate turbulence in the lefovers of old storms, and new cumilonimbus grew up into the flightpath. That's where the meteorlogist got the quote of 'they flew into a 100 mph wind', that's the updraft, 8,000 fpm if you're using statute miles.

My radar training at my regional isn't that great to be honest but they just gave us just before this accident a new radar handout and summer flying guide. About six years too late if you ask me. Anyway what I seem to remember about painting cumilonimbus growing from below while at high altitude: 1. turn up the gain, 2. make sure it's tilted down enough, 3. avoid even green returns.

Difficult to detect but still detectable...The fact is when flying in the ITCZ most of the cells contain so much moisture that painting it is not a problem. I flew nightly runs down to Bogota for fresh roses, and we didn't tiptoe around the updrafts, we just went around the whole thing. Crossing the ITCZ twice a night for months on end, using old Bendix monochrome RD4 radars you learned in a hurry if it painted anything above you went around it. The problem was when the radar quit in that old clapped out 50 series Diesel eight you strapped in tight and held on, thanking god you were in an airplane Donald Douglas built. It'll make a christian outta the most hardened sinner.

I have my own theorys on how one of the most sophisticated aircraft flying, with a top notch doppler radar got into this predicament, but as has been said before on this thread-there by the grace of god go I.

RIP, to the passengers and crew.

 

[trip]

My radar training at my regional isn't that great to be honest but they just gave us just before this accident a new radar handout and summer flying guide. About six years too late if you ask me. Anyway what I seem to remember about painting cumilonimbus growing from below while at high altitude: 1. turn up the gain, 2. make sure it's tilted down enough, 3. avoid even green returns.

Just remember when you turn up the gain you lose the PAC alert function, it is OK to turn it up for a look but best to leave it at normal for the full picture.

 

[A-Track]

Found this kind of interesting.

"Investigators also likely will explore a possible structural weakness in the A330's wing because it hit an AF A321 while taxing at Paris Charles de Gaulle in August 2006. Damage to the A330 was considered minor at the time but the A321's tail sustained substantial damage."

from the Air Transport World