FrontierFan
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 3, 2004
- Posts
- 106
I have been paired up with many pilots over 60 and some over 65 as of late. Here is my opinion based on my own life experiences.
To begin with I will not use blanket statements to cover any group of people as I believe such attempts at making a point take away any substance and validity to any attempted point. "All young people need babysat....or all 60+ year olds need depends etc"....is stupid
Second, I am 33, live in base, have ok seniority and will gain very very little if an age 65 rule was started at my company. So, at least, in my case "get outta my seat" does not apply to my personal situation.
Regardless of the emotion of those possibly affected by an age 65 rule at the fracts, here are some facts worth noting:
Two 60+ year-olds are not allowed to sit next to each other in international airspace per ICAO.
Those two CAL pilots who unfortunately died in their seats both had legal medicals and passed all checkrides. Dying at work could happen in your 30s but is far far less likely than someone over 60. Not surprisingly one of the biggest determination in life / health insurance is AGE.
There are many people over 60 and 65 that I have flown with who do a great job as a professional at Netjets. Not just pilots skillz but people skillz, numb chuck skillz, and are all around model crew-members.
I have also flown with a couple who were terrible. It wasn't because they were bad people, it was because they didn't age well. One guy in particular (who left NJA with the early out) was just terrible. No one had any idea how he got through his medical with his loss of hearing. You would have to repeat callouts two and three times. He couldn't control the volume of his voice so he would often yell through the head set at such loudness that all the pax in the back could hear him and later asked if he wore hearing aids.
He would commonly put the new assigned altitude in the heading and new assigned heading in the altitude window. Something like a runway change to a parallel would be turned into a border line emergency...and worst of all, his flying was completely embarrassing. Throwing customers drinks out of their hands while taxing, crashing onto runways, etc....just terrible.
Now he was a really nice guy but he would not hang it up. Now in my situation I was put into a bad spot because we did not have any age limits at NJA that would have removed him years prior and now I was left with what to do. It is very easy to say "screw it, he's a nice guy, yada yada yada". But it begged the question, "would I be comfortable with him flying anyone I cared about"? The answer was absolutely not. I flew with him on many tours so he didn't have a bad day (like we all do at times), he had a bad certificate that should have been revoked years prior.
Now some would now answer "hey why not call that union committee"? The reason is because its hard. Do I wanna take time out of my day off to go tell on my union brother who I have no beef with whatsoever and is genuinely a nice guy knowing you personally will have a negative impact on another union member's life? Not really. And then the self talk starts....
"why is this guy still here"? "I have friends who are furloughed AND aren't embarrassing to owners"
Now I don't believe every pilot degrades into what I witnessed after they turn 65...but some really really do.
The big question is what about those who may be in the majority who are the kind of people I have flown with lately. Great people and great people who happen to be over 60-65. Just because some are what I witnessed does not constitute a blanket cover all rule.
But medicals and checkrides don't always cover all the bases either. It didn't help those two CAL pilots who died in their seats nor did it help the guy I flew with years ago.
In a perfect world we are all going to have awesome careers and be in a financial position to retire at 60 and flying past 60 is purely for health insurance and a hobby. Unfortunately today's world is far far from perfect and I have met many who are still working past 60 because they absolutely have to.
So what do we do? I have flown with lots of people are over 60 and 65 who are model crew members. I have also flown with at least one who was in his early 60s and terrible. Honestly I don't want your seat. I am scared if we ever have a pilot die on a pax flight. On both occasions CAL was in the papers for sometime after these two guys died in the seat.
So here is my idea:
Why not keep our current medical / checkride requirements and use (nja's case) our union committees. And in addition maybe we should also consider an age limit of 70. There will still be many who can perform past 70 but I believe 70 is reasonable nonetheless.
Thoughts?
To begin with I will not use blanket statements to cover any group of people as I believe such attempts at making a point take away any substance and validity to any attempted point. "All young people need babysat....or all 60+ year olds need depends etc"....is stupid
Second, I am 33, live in base, have ok seniority and will gain very very little if an age 65 rule was started at my company. So, at least, in my case "get outta my seat" does not apply to my personal situation.
Regardless of the emotion of those possibly affected by an age 65 rule at the fracts, here are some facts worth noting:
Two 60+ year-olds are not allowed to sit next to each other in international airspace per ICAO.
Those two CAL pilots who unfortunately died in their seats both had legal medicals and passed all checkrides. Dying at work could happen in your 30s but is far far less likely than someone over 60. Not surprisingly one of the biggest determination in life / health insurance is AGE.
There are many people over 60 and 65 that I have flown with who do a great job as a professional at Netjets. Not just pilots skillz but people skillz, numb chuck skillz, and are all around model crew-members.
I have also flown with a couple who were terrible. It wasn't because they were bad people, it was because they didn't age well. One guy in particular (who left NJA with the early out) was just terrible. No one had any idea how he got through his medical with his loss of hearing. You would have to repeat callouts two and three times. He couldn't control the volume of his voice so he would often yell through the head set at such loudness that all the pax in the back could hear him and later asked if he wore hearing aids.
He would commonly put the new assigned altitude in the heading and new assigned heading in the altitude window. Something like a runway change to a parallel would be turned into a border line emergency...and worst of all, his flying was completely embarrassing. Throwing customers drinks out of their hands while taxing, crashing onto runways, etc....just terrible.
Now he was a really nice guy but he would not hang it up. Now in my situation I was put into a bad spot because we did not have any age limits at NJA that would have removed him years prior and now I was left with what to do. It is very easy to say "screw it, he's a nice guy, yada yada yada". But it begged the question, "would I be comfortable with him flying anyone I cared about"? The answer was absolutely not. I flew with him on many tours so he didn't have a bad day (like we all do at times), he had a bad certificate that should have been revoked years prior.
Now some would now answer "hey why not call that union committee"? The reason is because its hard. Do I wanna take time out of my day off to go tell on my union brother who I have no beef with whatsoever and is genuinely a nice guy knowing you personally will have a negative impact on another union member's life? Not really. And then the self talk starts....
"why is this guy still here"? "I have friends who are furloughed AND aren't embarrassing to owners"
Now I don't believe every pilot degrades into what I witnessed after they turn 65...but some really really do.
The big question is what about those who may be in the majority who are the kind of people I have flown with lately. Great people and great people who happen to be over 60-65. Just because some are what I witnessed does not constitute a blanket cover all rule.
But medicals and checkrides don't always cover all the bases either. It didn't help those two CAL pilots who died in their seats nor did it help the guy I flew with years ago.
In a perfect world we are all going to have awesome careers and be in a financial position to retire at 60 and flying past 60 is purely for health insurance and a hobby. Unfortunately today's world is far far from perfect and I have met many who are still working past 60 because they absolutely have to.
So what do we do? I have flown with lots of people are over 60 and 65 who are model crew members. I have also flown with at least one who was in his early 60s and terrible. Honestly I don't want your seat. I am scared if we ever have a pilot die on a pax flight. On both occasions CAL was in the papers for sometime after these two guys died in the seat.
So here is my idea:
Why not keep our current medical / checkride requirements and use (nja's case) our union committees. And in addition maybe we should also consider an age limit of 70. There will still be many who can perform past 70 but I believe 70 is reasonable nonetheless.
Thoughts?