Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I said no such thing. Nor has my position changed, as it's the truth. Congress passed the legislation. It wasn't passed by pilots. I didn't lobby for it, neither did an organization to which I below contribute money, or lobby for it. Pilots didn't push it through. Elected members of congress did this. Furthermore, pilots didn't vote for it. This was done as an act of congress, and became public law. Again we see that you lie. You tell lies, and are therefore, a liar.
So Congress passed the legislation. No kidding. The rule change didn’t exist in a vacuum. To say that pilots didn’t push this through Congress just shows a complete lack of understanding of the issue and what happened behind the scenes to get Age 65 backdoored through Congress. I know, I was in the debriefing by our legal team up on the hill.
Avgas continues to use his shotgun “liar” tactic to try and shoot down any disagreement to his support of Age 65. He may continue to call us liars (as is his right and his diversionary tactic) but it doesn’t change the fact that Age 65 made this a less safe industry. He claims to have flown with guys over 60 but from his statements, I really wonder. There is little doubt on how demanding this profession is on our bodies and yet Avgas admits to wanting no age limit. Again it’s obvious that he has little concern about industry safety just as long as he still has a shot at his pilot’s job. And who’s the greedy one?
He still never addresses the fact that the junior pilots had “career expectations” before Age 65 other to say we just wanted the “old man’s seat.” Which, as most of know, was the exact opposite of what happened. Bottom line -- the senior guys wanted to keep their seats at the junior pilot’s expense and got it.
Moreover, it’s absolutely insane to make a statement that Age 65 has no bearing on what is now happening in the industry. Over at American right now, we have over 2000 pilots furlough and 200 pilots flying over the age of 60. Not costing any jobs – yeah right.
As arrogant and pompous a poster as Avgas, why does he continue to cower in anonymity and hide behind his keyboard? Why won’t his post his age, where he works and post his credentials? He’s admits to being a furloughed pilot, now on the outside looking in. Who’s the bitter one in the debate? It’s obvious he is an older pilot that is merely trying to keep his career going at another junior pilot’s expense.
He and a few of his pro 65 buddies thought I was a former TWA pilot that was furloughed. Like most of their views, they were way off the mark. I have 19 years over at American. I take it as an honor though trying to stick up for the junior pilot’s rights.
Make no mistake about – Age 65 was a giant step backwards for the profession. Lot's of pilots got screwed.
AA767AV8TOR
There's a dead horse out in the field next door - I'm gonna go beat it.
Exactly. Age 65 is the law. Period.
Game over, goodnight, drive home safely.
Now we see the problem: A sky Nazi. No compassion for the older pilots who made your job what it once was, until you screwed it up with Eagle and alike. Your solution to your dilemma was to take away others for the extermination of their right to work so you could take what they had. It all figures now.I have 19 years over at American.
BTW: AVBUG really made chopped meat out of you and Floppy too, didn't he?
BTW, I just ran your little "UAL put the fix in" theory to a ground...Dude, they didn't want to hire you!!
Enjoy your airline work.
Whoa there punkin! That tool went incomunicado when it became obvious I was just getting warmed up. I'd ask you the same question he chose to ignore, but frankly, I don't care what you think. BTW, I just ran your little "UAL put the fix in" theory to a ground...Dude, they didn't want to hire you!! What the hell makes you think you should displace a potted plant, let alone a legitimate pilot, from any flight crew position when mgt doesn't want you around? They own the seat, don't they? It's not the pilot list, it's the owner/operator. It's fascinating, but even with 65 neither the pilot group nor mgt can keep the pilots they want to keep, but they are forced to keep the duds nobody wants. That's really what this rule is about.