Clyde
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2004
- Posts
- 660
pilotyip said:clyde the size of your no is no reflectionion upon the impact of your vote in this meaningless process
So size doesen't matter?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
pilotyip said:clyde the size of your no is no reflectionion upon the impact of your vote in this meaningless process
pilotyip said:71kilo, your data sampling collection method would fail even the Stats 101-sniff test. People can not voluntarily elect to participate in a survey, and provide valid results; your sampling would have to approach something like the 10%-15% range. Proper sampling would be I am going to sample by the last number in a pilots license number and skip every 100. Then you are generating a truly random sample; and then you may have valid results than can pass the sniff test. Now if you had counted all of my votes and the yes’s won, I would say you are a true genius, send it to the president for signature.
Chest Rockwell said:Yes. I have not heard one good reason to not change the rule.
71KILO said:They could simply abstain and their vote meaningless (i.e. gutshottool). quote]
It's always so easy to get a rise out of a Tempe State Teacher's College grad.
Abstention is not always meaningless. If you ever watch United Nations voting or the occasional Supreme Court decision, you'd know that abstentions can make all the difference in the world.
It's so fun busting your chops, Sparky.
71KILO said:G-S-D: UofA better teams / ASU better women. You choose...
quote]
Okay Sparky,
We had our share down south but tough to argue...still waiting for Stoops to take back the Territorial Cup though.
Since you apparently lightened up.......
"Bill Mitchell....votes.....no."
Extra credit for naming the movie.