Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Age 60 informal poll

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Abolish the Age 60 Rule for other that Part 91 pilots?

  • Yea

    Votes: 668 35.5%
  • Nay

    Votes: 1,214 64.5%

  • Total voters
    1,882
Hey Scooter,

Tell me how I did anything to your career. You going to tell me you know how I feel about 65 Ect. You have no idea. I'd like to see you stand up for anything. Go ahead, walk away from a job like I and 100's of other EAL pilots did.

And i am the one full of BS, Get a life.

K. When you lost your job and someone else took it....that was bad. You do no less than the same to someone else? That's OK? Got it. Yes, you are full of BS.

Tear up your list. Apologize to everyone who's had to listen to your "poor wittle me" crap. Or add your name to it. The sum total of good you think you brought to this career was zero'd out with 65.
 
K. When you lost your job and someone else took it....that was bad. You do no less than the same to someone else? That's OK? Got it. Yes, you are full of BS.

Tear up your list. Apologize to everyone who's had to listen to your "poor wittle me" crap. Or add your name to it. The sum total of good you think you brought to this career was zero'd out with 65.

Again scooter you have no idea how I vote or feel about any issue. Explain to me why I at 46 am for 65. News flash...my career has now stagnated as well only I don't spend all day moaning about it.
 
Forget the exact issue and how it effects either of us personally. You supported a minority issue that short circuited seniority outside the CBA. And I'm worried about what you and other weak members are going to drean up next! Furthermore, I'm finished listening to any striker tell me how crucial and noble their actions were. They are the ones staying at CAL and the ones who wanted this the most. (almost without exception). I'm going to let the scabs off the hook and my list is going in the trash. Because while you may not be one, I don't see much of a difference.
 
Forget the exact issue and how it effects either of us personally. You supported a minority issue that short circuited seniority outside the CBA. And I'm worried about what you and other weak members are going to drean up next! Furthermore, I'm finished listening to any striker tell me how crucial and noble their actions were. They are the ones staying at CAL and the ones who wanted this the most. (almost without exception). I'm going to let the scabs off the hook and my list is going in the trash. Because while you may not be one, I don't see much of a difference.

Which issue is that?
 
News flash...my career has now stagnated as well only I don't spend all day moaning about it.

Amen, EV. All our careers have. And for all the whiners out there, Age 60 ain't coming back. So all the moaning about guys staying on is pissing in the wind.

Time to get over it. This profession has other fish to fry.
 
Amen, EV. All our careers have. And for all the whiners out there, Age 60 ain't coming back. So all the moaning about guys staying on is pissing in the wind.

Time to get over it. This profession has other fish to fry.


I'll make a deal with you: I promise to gripe about this no more than 10% of what guys like eaglesview griped about what happened to them at EAL, CAL, TI, and UAL. Deal? Because those guys haven't stopped griping about being screwed then and it's been 25 years.
 
Time to get over it. This profession has other fish to fry.

Coming from you, that statement worries me.

I mean, I know you actually believe that...you think you've made some sage observation. The concept that we've squandered so much politcal capital in getting the retirement age change that now it's harder to go after the other fish is completely lost on you.
 
Last edited:
I see your point, but I disagree with the premise. We didn't squander ANY political capital. The change was prompted by the ICAO change. It was a done deal no matter what ALPA's input would have been.

And, that's precisely why they flip flopped on the issue. By dropping their opposition, they were able to get inside the legislation and make the changes that were needed to protect pilots (i.e. no change to medical standard, etc.).

Point is its the law. We'll never go back, so complaining about doesn't help.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top