Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

AA to Lay Off 2,500 Pilots...... Ouch!!!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Ty Webb said:
This is too funny,

The reason I ended up flying corporate was because I couldn't afford to work for a regional . . . . and I used to rail on these boards at pilots who were willing to fly regional airplanes for poverty-level wages because it was "a carer move". Some pilots with the extreme version of this attitude were even willing to pay thousands of dollars to get at that regional seat (PFT).

Now, one of those former regional pilots is throwing mud at me for only making $60K as a second year FO at a National carrier.

Seems like this argument has gone full circle, and this is where I am getting off.

You guys have yourselves a good one . . . .


The term regional didn't really apply to ASA at the time I mentioned... The company has gone a long way since those days, and their pay has too... I dare say I would be making close to what I make now in the corporate world, but with the benefit of a union contract had I stayed... Those were different times, and today while regionals pay crappy first year wages, they pay a decent wage in the later years...

Also..

I don't know what kind of "Corporate" flying you did, but my company now will no touch you unless you have 2500TT 500multi for an FO, and 3500TT and 1000Turbine multi for CPT. So you can't compare my career move with yours... I could find any kind of corporate job with 800 hours in my log book back in the mid 90s, and If you want to hammer on PFT.... I hardly think that someone who will defend SWA's requirement for a 737 type rating one who should be throwing stones... especially since SWA doesn't hire 800hr pilots with C152 time making the bulk of it... Apples and Oranges.
 
V70T5 said:
The term regional didn't really apply to ASA at the time I mentioned... [/i].

Semantics, pal. Your argument is illogical. You think it was OK for you to captain a 40 or 70 seat airplane for $35K because "it was a stepping stone" yet you'll rail against me for flying as a Capt. on a 117 seater for over $110K?

Put down the crack pipe, pal. The rest of your arguments are equally assinine:

... Those were different times, and today while regionals pay crappy first year wages, they pay a decent wage in the later years...

Really? Then you must consider AirTran FO pay to be "decent wages", too, since it's about the same as ASA Captain pay. And we're not even talking AirTran Captain pay, right?

Sounds to me like you are pissed because if you had come here from ASA, you'd be a fairly senior captain, making over $120K with a great schedule and future, instead of sitting in your corporate jet singing your "They done me wrong" song.

Put a sock in it.
 
Ty,
I am 4th yr Capt on the ATR @59.80. I was under the impression first yr F/O there was around 35.00 hr. Is that in the ballpark? Was thinking of applying but hesitant due to the difference.
thanks PM if you'd rather.
 
To all who argue with V7,

Notice the "I's" in his sentences. He has never cared about anything but himself and sadly probably never will. He is obviously very proud of his flying accomplishments (as he should be) but he cannot control his lack of humility. So, to those who would argue with him I suggest you go kiss your kids, buy them some ice cream and enjoy life. V7 is an unhappy soul and probably only enjoys certain moments in life rather than life itself.

Corndog.
 
Ty Webb said:
V70T5 said:
The term regional didn't really apply to ASA at the time I mentioned... [/i].

Semantics, pal. Your argument is illogical. You think it was OK for you to captain a 40 or 70 seat airplane for $35K because "it was a stepping stone" yet you'll rail against me for flying as a Capt. on a 117 seater for over $110K?

Put down the crack pipe, pal. The rest of your arguments are equally assinine:

... Those were different times, and today while regionals pay crappy first year wages, they pay a decent wage in the later years...

Really? Then you must consider AirTran FO pay to be "decent wages", too, since it's about the same as ASA Captain pay. And we're not even talking AirTran Captain pay, right?

Sounds to me like you are pissed because if you had come here from ASA, you'd be a fairly senior captain, making over $120K with a great schedule and future, instead of sitting in your corporate jet singing your "They done me wrong" song.

Put a sock in it.

Wrong.... you have no concept of time or something?

How can you compare my time at a "regional" or commuter 8 years ago when all I had in my log book was 800 hours... with you sitting at a National with thousands of hours today? I built my time there, and apparently you built your time in some "corporate" job... great....

You keep switching to subject to my early days at the commuters, but you don't seem to want to admit that YOU ARE UNDERPAID today!!!!!
Or let me guess, maybe you can buy a house and a car and feed your family there in Atlanta on $60K, while paying off your student loans and having money left over to have a life? Have you seen how much Nurses with a two year degree are making over at Northside Hospital for 3 days of 12 hour work? about $60K pal.... you deserve more than that for flying a $35 million dollar plane with 120 people around, don't you?

I won't lie to you, I'd rather be at American than my corporate job.... but no I would not go back to $60K year on an ATR or RJ, in place of 80K on a citation with much more on the horizon if I were to stay with my job, as they have Falcon 2000, Citation X, 737 and 757 in the fleet, and they pay well, and I work a 7 and 7 schedule...

So AGAIN, don't try to turn this personal... Stick to the facts..

I would much rather be at American, but they have to furlough a few thousand (the subject of the thread) since they can't compete with the likes of SWA and Airtran and they $99 fares, which can be profitable to the aforementioned since they pay less and get more out of you!

And please quit making this personal.
 
Enigma: very informative post. Good Job.

To V70T5, you stated that the industry is becoming an oligopoly. You couldn't further from the truth. The industry WAS an oligopoly. But no more. That ended in the mid 90's or so when SWA and other LLC's were crushing the majors. Prior to that occurance, all the majors colluded (informally, of course) on price structure, routing, seats etc. - i.e. the definition of an oligopoly.

Since the mid-90's the airlines have been trying to be 'original' by adding LLC to their own fleets, lowering prices, and increasing passenger roominess (AA). That is pure capitalistic competition, and the last battle of 'the end of deregulation'. The war is almost over. To the winner belong the spoils my friend.

Welcome to America!
 
corndog said:
To all who argue with V7,

Notice the "I's" in his sentences. He has never cared about anything but himself and sadly probably never will. He is obviously very proud of his flying accomplishments (as he should be) but he cannot control his lack of humility. So, to those who would argue with him I suggest you go kiss your kids, buy them some ice cream and enjoy life. V7 is an unhappy soul and probably only enjoys certain moments in life rather than life itself.

Corndog.


it's amazing to me that someone who seems to sound like a nice guy, can make a judgment that profound about someone whom he's never spoken to just because the majority of the people on this thread have teamed up on me. how do you know I don't care about anyone? And who exactly do you care about?

This board is mainly visited by people who are going to be very unfriendly to my arguments, since the other "major" airlines aren't going to be doing any "interviewing" anytime soon....

Trust me, this wouldn't be such a gang bang were there to be more American, Delta, and others reading this forum... I guess, I should do the same myself as I seem to be pissing in the wind with you and the other lot.
 
Last edited:
Re: Re: Re: Re: You ever notice?

V70T5 said:
Just because economic theory dictates that profit will go to zero in true competition, that doesn't mean we should allow it to. Because since you're an economics expert, you should also know that this industry is heading towards first, oligopoly, then monopoly.... again if we don't do anything about it.

..



How do you propose to not allow profit to go to zero?

The next comment makes you look a little snippy, but I guess I deserve it for asking if you only read the cliff notes.

I am a long way from an economics expert, just a general studies guy from ERAU CDL; but I can observe the obvious. It is obvious that SWA has a different market than AA, DAL, NWA, USA, UAL, CAL. Those carriers are all global, SWA is not. Cactus is the only major that I can think of that competes directly with SWA for the entirety of its business. I contend that the problems experienced by AA (which is what I understand the discussion to be) are related not to SWA pay, but to fallen revenue in AA's market. AA and all the old style mainline carriers built their business to provide seamless, global travel; and when that market fell apart, so did those carriers.

If memory serves, AA and the others were making money before 2001; and SWA existed then just as it does now. If SWA 's pilot wages are indeed a problem, AA would have had as large a problem in 2000 as it does in 2003. AA didn't, therefore I conclude that SWA pilot pay is not your problem.

If you really want someone/something to blame, I suggest that you point to: AA management who took over TWA, UsamaBinLaden, the internet, dotcom bombs, etc.

On a personal note, I spent countless hours attempting to convince my fellow pilots to respect our profession. I typed so many anti PFT posts that I used up a keyboard. So I understand your attempt to convince others to demand more. I just don't understand why you would have singled out SWA.

regards,
8N
 
corndog said:
He has never cared about anything but himself and sadly probably never will.

I have nothing but respect for age and those who have gone before me in this amazing industry, and flown those millions of safe and unheralded miles.

But that particualr line irks me. LOL. It appears that V70T5 cares in fact about the earning potential of every pilot in the industry. He doesn't want them fired, bankrupt or furloughed, he merely wishes for a bit of unity to benefit all parties. But should his concern be only of himself and his family's wealth, well, again, more power to him. That is his ordained responsibility.

Everybody on this board needs to find and read a copy of the 1956 classic "Atlas Shrugged", by Ayn Rand. Then talk about feeling and caring. It's the only economics textbook that you'll never be able to put down.

V70 settled for below optimum wages for a period of less than a decade, with the intention of earning a premium wage in the near future and for the rest of his career, perhaps another 30 years. Ty Webb took premium wages in the early stage of his career for a similarly short period of time, and is now proud to make bottom-half of the industry wages for the rest of his career, perhaps another 30 years. Who has the largest negative impact? In fact the low entry level wages can be argued to have a net upward effect on wages throughout the industry, simply by posing as a barrier to entry and thus reducing the supply of pilots. It almost kept Ty out of the business, which would have reduced the number of pilots currently clawing for a job. It also keeps those earning 40k/yr at a sketchy 135 outfit comfortable and thus many will not fight tooth and nail for, and will not cross a picket line for, that airline job. That isn't esoteric justification. I've seen it personally countless times.

Another poster berates the frequency with which V70 posts. Being a furloughed AA pilot, the very subject of this thread, certainly entitles the man to an opinion does it not?

Ponder the impact of the signature line on the above post:
Those who would trade freedom for security, deserve neither.
Ben Franklin
The freedom to earn more, versus the security of mediocrity?

What is the net impact of these and other ill-advised rebuttals? The International Brotherhood of Koolaid Drinkers (The SWA poolies, et al), say "Ra, ra, SWA is great." V70 offers well reasoned motivation and methodology to improve pilot compensation and is spit upon. Who holds the higher ground? I could pontificate about the Jews acceptance of Roman domination, but I fear that in this twisted modern world that would actually weaken my argument, so I'll stop right here.

V70T5, how about selecting an automobile NOT made in a socialist country, eh? ;) They're are lots of nice Toyotas produced in relative economic freedom. Keep up the good work.
 
Last edited:
ATR-DRIVR said:
Ty,
I am 4th yr Capt on the ATR @59.80. I was under the impression first yr F/O there was around 35.00 hr. Is that in the ballpark? Was thinking of applying but hesitant due to the difference.
thanks PM if you'd rather.


Rates just went up this month, and my contract is at home, but I think first year FO went up to $39.50/hr second yr FO $54. and third year Capt $101. Top pay scale at year 12 is around $156./hr

Lines average 84.5 hrs and per diem is $1.75 uprade running about 2.5 years. New aircraft to be announced in June. 800 pilots, counting the 40 in training right now. I owuld guess we'll probably hire another 80-90 this year, but that's just my guess, I don;t know what the company is projecting.
 
Cardinal said:


V70 settled for below optimum wages for a period of less than a decade, with the intention of earning a premium wage in the near future and for the rest of his career, perhaps another 30 years. Ty Webb took premium wages in the early stage of his career for a similarly short period of time, and is now proud to make bottom-half of the industry wages for the rest of his career, perhaps another 30 years. Who has the largest negative impact? In fact the low entry level wages can be argued to have a net upward effect on wages throughout the industry, simply by posing as a barrier to entry and thus reducing the supply of pilots.

The International Brotherhood of Koolaid Drinkers (The SWA poolies, et al), say "Ra, ra, SWA is great." V70 offers well reasoned motivation and methodology to improve pilot compensation and is spit upon. Who holds the higher ground? I could pontificate about the Jews acceptance of Roman domination, but I fear that in this twisted modern world that would actually weaken my argument, so I'll stop right here.

Wow!! Except for your defense of V70 making many posts on this topic... (which I'm glad he does because he has alot to contribute)... your post is ridiculous on so many levels. Where to begin... first.. you actually believe anybody is happy to be a the bottom of payscales? Of course not. AirTran by the way IS NOT at the bottom, regardless of what you "think", and your "thinking" is incorrect. Our contract is equal to and in some cases better than our peer group (MidEx, Sprirt, Frontier, etc). As far as to what some of us will earn over a 30 year career at AirTran, how in the world could you possibly know. We might not even be around.. then again if we continue to make a modest wage and allow our company to stay in business, never furlough, and provide a good lifestyle and security to us and our families, then sign me up. And I'll let all the bitter naysayers sit at home furloughed with their twisted logic that "we" are whats wrong. No.. YOU are whats wrong. If you can't see that then please keep that line of thinking and career path going and it will continue to help me and many like me out to a long and uninterupted prosperous career. BTW $70,000 - $80,000 this year, and $100,000 - $160,000+ next year on for the length of the life of AirTran is considered prosperous for most people flying a small 117 passenger jet. if you don't like it please continue to criticize and leave the flying to us. We will also continue to keep the profession alive, while you carry on with your company economics mission for management...err... I mean martyrdom. We're doing just fine.

Most B-1900 operators are bottom end. Many regional codeshares are bottom end. SWA is not. As far as your koolaid comment.. it really sums up your true knowledge of this Mr. Kamikazi. Relative to AA, Delta, US, etc., SWA is lower in wages... BUT they are not in the same comparison catagory... period. What... just because they are a major.. get real. They have offered 5 times the overall benefits to their pilots over what any major has EVER been able to offer their pilots... and that is a FACT. (Heres the secret... theres more to life and career than just the bottom dollar....psst.... pass it along!)

Believe me the SWA pilots are laughing their ass off at you right now with your ridiculous post and "insight".
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by Cardinal
Everybody on this board needs to find and read a copy of the 1956 classic "Atlas Shrugged", by Ayn Rand. Then talk about feeling and caring. It's the only economics textbook that you'll never be able to put down.


Reading your post, I suspected it was written by someone whose knowledge of Economics was gleaned by a 50 year-old work of fiction.

Where do you get your Industry knowlege from? L. Ron Hubbard's "Scientology" books?

Let me recommend a book for you, my friend, it is called "Hard Landings- the History of the Airlines".

Even though your profile indicates that you have little industry experience, and you are experiencing the first furlough of the several you canexpect in your chosen career path, you want to tell me and the pilots of the LCC's what you, in your infinite wisdom, believe we should work for.

OK, Pal, we'll give you your chance:

How much SHOULD the pilots of a 117 pax airplane be making? BEcause you seem to have all the answers. But wait, let me give you the rest of the details-

I want to have a short, 1 hour on-line commute to my home in a beachfront community. I want to have the least chance of wearing the orange apron (furlough) or starting over in mid-stream. I want to upgrade quickly, so I can fly with my favorite captain every day, and the only time I want to cross the pond is when I am on vacation. Flight Attndents- please, let me not have to deal with more than three, and my penis is large enough as it is, thank you, I don;t need to be flying a "heavy" to feel that I have arrived. If it pays more, fine, but if causes a degradation in my schedule, upgrade or quality of life, I'll forgo the extra pay, I'm doing OK, thanks.

Oh, and I really enjoy working at a company where the vast majority of pilots are happy and spend relatively little time bitching- please don;t put me at anywhere where the corporate culture involves sitting around bitching about how the "Company" is screwing me.

Now, since you are the self-annointed Oracle of the Industry, why don;t you tell me where I should work, how much I should be willing to work for, Sporto?

Thanks, appreciate your efforts.
 
Ty Webb said:
Originally posted by Cardinal
Everybody on this board needs to find and read a copy of the 1956 classic "Atlas Shrugged", by Ayn Rand. Then talk about feeling and caring. It's the only economics textbook that you'll never be able to put down.


Reading your post, I suspected it was written by someone whose knowledge of Economics was gleaned by a 50 year-old work of fiction.

Where do you get your Industry knowlege from? L. Ron Hubbard's "Scientology" books?

Let me recommend a book for you, my friend, it is called "Hard Landings- the History of the Airlines".

Even though your profile indicates that you have little industry experience, and you are experiencing the first furlough of the several you canexpect in your chosen career path, you want to tell me and the pilots of the LCC's what you, in your infinite wisdom, believe we should work for.

OK, Pal, we'll give you your chance:

How much SHOULD the pilots of a 117 pax airplane be making? BEcause you seem to have all the answers. But wait, let me give you the rest of the details-

I want to have a short, 1 hour on-line commute to my home in a beachfront community. I want to have the least chance of wearing the orange apron (furlough) or starting over in mid-stream. I want to upgrade quickly, so I can fly with my favorite captain every day, and the only time I want to cross the pond is when I am on vacation. Flight Attndents- please, let me not have to deal with more than three, and my penis is large enough as it is, thank you, I don;t need to be flying a "heavy" to feel that I have arrived. If it pays more, fine, but if causes a degradation in my schedule, upgrade or quality of life, I'll forgo the extra pay, I'm doing OK, thanks.

Oh, and I really enjoy working at a company where the vast majority of pilots are happy and spend relatively little time bitching- please don;t put me at anywhere where the corporate culture involves sitting around bitching about how the "Company" is screwing me.

Now, since you are the self-annointed Oracle of the Industry, why don;t you tell me where I should work, how much I should be willing to work for, Sporto?

Thanks, appreciate your efforts.


Ty,

People on this thread are trying to have a conversation about a critical subject, our careers, and you keep resorting to ad hominem attacks, and addressing people "pal" with a tough-guy tone that frankly rubs me as arrogant.

That, all said... I think that in your heart, you care a lot about this industry, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt.

AirTran is not a major player like SWA all by it's self... but when you take AirTran, Frontier, SWA, JB, ATA, Spirit, Hooters, etc... all together paying wages ranging from 90% to 30% of major airline pay-scale (a guesstimate)... that exerts economic down force on wages in the rest of the industry. It is not feasible for Delta, and American to fly from Phoenix to Dallas, or Atlanta to Detroit in a 737 or 757 that is paying it's Captain and FO a combined Salary with Pension and other productivity related benefits, that the above mentioned LCC's aren't providing. And you have to ask your self, how well has our wages as pilots kept up with the other professional occupations... not well, I assure you.

College grads with a BA in Finance can expect between $34,000 and $43,000 per year at age 23... what does a 23 year old FO on a Brasilia or ATR make??? ... about $21,000/yr.. When I came to the "commuters" they were a stepping stone, no anymore my friend... they are the growth (at the expense of mainline) and as such those wages are no longer acceptable.

I don't mean to pick on SWA specifically, but I used them as an example as they are all on their own a HUGE factor in price pressure in the industry, which while helping the consumer, is killing our once glorious profession.

If you saw the movie Catch Me If You Can, you will remember how the pilots were very highly regarded back in those days, for many reasons, not the least of which was their position in the food chain or wages...

We'll SWA, and the other LCC's combine together to erode this dramatically.

Sure, there is more to the whole downturn than pilot wages, but it is nevertheless a piece of the pie that has to be addressed by US as pilots, since we cannot effect the other factors, such as the economy and demand for international travel.

AirTran is a young company, and your pay is on the rise, and I can only hope that you continue to fight for top dollar as you shouldn't see your self as a second class pilot just because you don't fly for Delta.

Delta pay's their well, and provides a great pension, and so should AirTran...

In the specific case of AirTran, It is a known fact that AirTran has a good number of "scabs" most from Eastern flying there, and that may have hurt the pilot groups efforts to get a strong union, ALPA being more suitable IMHO than Teamsters on their property, but they are all near retirement age and then I would expect the younger captains that see themselves as career AirTran will take the helm and steer the company towards an Industry Average contract at the least... This is what Continental did, and Fedex... this is the best chance for the industry, a united union that will itself change from being a two and three tier union to a one tear union, and undercut the managers divide and conquer tactic.

But this whole Distinction between Major's and Nationals is BS... nothing more than an artificial title given by the DOT with the lobbying help of the ATA to companies that are allowed to pay less for the SAME WORK.
 
VT,

I have fought this fight for years. However, my ideas don't have merit because I am just another "arrogant Delta pilot" and my "sh*t don't stink." You must be an "a-hole" as well because you would dare propose the idea that when a company's competitors enjoy a huge cost advantage on the largest expense, it just might have a negative effect. The idea is ridiculous, and you sould be ashamed of yourself for even proposing it.
 
V70t5:

I know that your reply was to TyWebb, but as I stated earlier, you seem to have alot to contribute and I would like to engage here. I hear (read) what you are saying and agree with some of your logic... BUT.. I have to respectfully disagree on several points. Before I get on a rant, let me add that I get rambling when people talk of LCC's "eroding the profession'. I'm sorry but that is a poor choice of words and not correct. Your reference to the great movie Catch Me if You Can is way off (IMO). People today still think airline pilots make tons of money. They have no idea. The change in perception has NOTHING to do with low cost carriers. It probably has to do with a new generation of adults that are very different than our parents and grandparents due to technology, education, and common courtesy.

There IS a vast difference between National and Major carriers.

AirTran will lose its competitive advantage if we follow the legacy carriers in total compensation packages.. period. (FlyDeltaJets is 100% correct), however...I do not believe in industry standard. I couldn't care less what your company or any other airline pays their employees. Never have. I care about what our pilots get paid.. and how our pilots are treated, and what our quality of life is. That is the key, not following some other company over a cliff. With that said, I know what underpaid is. Underpaid is $15,000 -$24,000 a year flying for an air carrier. That is not relative.. that is cold hard fact. I do not know what overpaid is. I assume its when your compant cannot survive during a business downturn without furloughs and contract concessions.

As far as the reference to some of the ex-Eastern pilots at our company. they have worked their @ss off at this company, and very few remain.. less than 5% of our 800+ pilots. We are not Teamsters, we are National Pilots Association (NPA) which is part of national CAPA, and hope we remain that way.

I appreciate your insight. Who do you work for?

FlyDeltaJets:
Its all about you...
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom