Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

787 (cough caugh gag cough) starts up!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

~~~^~~~

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 21, 2001
Posts
6,137
http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2009/05/video-boeing-787---za001---eng.html

It's a smoky thing. Guess it was burning out some sort of solvent or engine storage goop.

Like the frog in the video...


EVERETT, Wash., May 21 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Boeing [NYSE: BA continued to make steady progress toward the first flight of the 787 Dreamliner, completing the first engine runs on the all-new airplane. The occasion marks the first all-electric start of a commercial jetliner engine on a twin-aisle commercial jetliner; the engines had been started electronically in test facilities earlier.

Engine runs began at 9:30 a.m. (PDT) today and ended 40 minutes later. During initial engine runs, the engines are started and operated at various power settings to ensure all systems perform as expected. Today's engine run test began with the Auxiliary Power System providing power to start the two Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines. Basic systems checks continued throughout the test. The engines were powered down and inspected and will be restarted following a technical review. The team completed a vibration check and monitored the shutdown logic to ensure it functioned as expected.

"We were very pleased with the performance on the engines during this test," said Scott Fancher, vice president and general manager of the 787 program. "We will now get ready for our intermediate and final gauntlet tests."
 
Last edited:
The occasion marks the first all-electric start of a commercial jetliner engine on a twin-aisle commercial jetliner; the engines had been started electronically in test facilities earlier.

What does this mean? Are they using starter/generators or something similar to start the engines? Electric air pumps?
 
What does this mean? Are they using starter/generators or something similar to start the engines? Electric air pumps?
The APU supplies electric power to the electric starter/generators.
 
A friend of mine has a small, hand cranked, German turbine engine. The turbine is really just a mini APU with a generator on it. Cranking that contrary SOB is a true test of manhood. I can not even conceive of an electric motor that could start a Trent 1000.

Wonder what the starter cooling times are?
 
Yep- "Picking oil" Sure.....

I would like to know why they would use such oil of stainless steel and titanium parts.... There is not one single part in any modern jet engine that will rust.

Maybe they needed like 1500 gallons of "pickling oil" for the wammmmerflainker valve.

-Believe what you wish.

-I just hope Boeing can get it together with this plane-it looks great on paper, but they sure are striving to make it interesting.
 
They ran those engines in Marana a few months ago. Very quiet.
 
Last edited:
I can not even conceive of an electric motor that could start a Trent 1000.

According to published specs, each engine is equipped with 2 250kVA starter generators.

500 kVA equates to about 536 horsepower and can start the engine in under 40 seconds using both or under 70 seconds using one starter.

That is a lot of electrons.
 
Yep- "Picking oil" Sure.....

I would like to know why they would use such oil of stainless steel and titanium parts.... There is not one single part in any modern jet engine that will rust.

Maybe they needed like 1500 gallons of "pickling oil" for the wammmmerflainker valve.

-Believe what you wish.

-I just hope Boeing can get it together with this plane-it looks great on paper, but they sure are striving to make it interesting.

Go back to picking your nose and serving fries dickweed! The regionals forum is on the other page!
 
According to published specs, each engine is equipped with 2 250kVA starter generators.

I'm too silly to look up the specs, because I think they'd say the same thing you did. I would still be lost.

What unit of measure is a kVA?

Thanks-
 
I'm too silly to look up the specs, because I think they'd say the same thing you did. I would still be lost.

What unit of measure is a kVA?

Thanks-

a VA is a "Volt Amp", similar to a watt but not exactly since we're talking about Alternating Current and inductive loads.

Roughly 500kVA is 500,000 Watts.
 
Yep- "Picking oil" Sure.....

I would like to know why they would use such oil of stainless steel and titanium parts.... There is not one single part in any modern jet engine that will rust.

Maybe they needed like 1500 gallons of "pickling oil" for the wammmmerflainker valve.

-Believe what you wish.

Ah, ignorance.

I suppose the licks of flames out of this old 737 is just a Boeing PR stunt? In a CAL hangar 15 years after delivery, 1 hour after a new FCU was installed? http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/4/5/8/0639854.jpg

And I suppose the smoke and flames pouring from this 737 with a new engine is another Boeing PR stunt, in the cold and dark of a Scandinavian winter. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDc8o_h-dn0
 
In the Boeing Aero from 4Q 06, there's a great write up on the 787, including why they've moved towards a "no bleed, more electrics system architecture". Here's a snippet:


The Boeing 787 reflects a completely new approach to onboard systems. Virtually everything that has traditionally been powered by bleed-air from the engines has been transitioned to an electric architecture.
The affected systems include:
Engine start
Auxiliary power unit (APU ) start
Wing ice protection
Cabin pressurization
Hydraulic pumps

Here's a link to the issue: http://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/articles/qtr_4_06/index.html
 
Last edited:
Think about it. Less weight of the duct work, and less bleed overall mean more thrust to move the jet, and or a lower specific fuel consumption for a given airspeed.

If you are not bleeding the air off of the compressor, it makes the engine more efficient. Wonder why you do a PKOFF takeoff? More thrust for given thrust setting.
 
Yep- "Picking oil" Sure.....

I would like to know why they would use such oil of stainless steel and titanium parts.... There is not one single part in any modern jet engine that will rust.

Maybe they needed like 1500 gallons of "pickling oil" for the wammmmerflainker valve.

-Believe what you wish.

-I just hope Boeing can get it together with this plane-it looks great on paper, but they sure are striving to make it interesting.
I don't know what was in it. Maybe that was the mother of all hot starts. :eek:

If so, they failed the universal turbine abnormal start checklist:

fuel SH
utoff..Ignition on..Time to starter limit
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom