777 from HKG to LHR in 23 hours

B747FR8DAWG

GIANT 747
Joined
Jan 23, 2005
Posts
465
Total Time
> 1

Boeing attempts record jet flight
Aerospace giant Boeing is attempting to break the world record for the longest non-stop passenger airline flight.
A Boeing 777-200LR Worldliner jet took off from Hong Kong at 1030 local time (1430 GMT) and is due to arrive in London on Thursday at 1330 GMT.
The 23-hour flight will cover about 12,500 miles (20,300 km), taking the plane over North America rather than the shorter route to London via Russia.
Boeing hopes to challenge arch rival Airbus with its new long-haul jet.
Fierce competition
Boeing said the current world record for the longest non-stop commercial airline flight was set in 1989 by a Boeing 747-400 jumbo jet, which flew 10,500 miles from London to Sydney.

Boeing is set to make aviation history in the next few hours and we are going to set a new long-distance non-stop record for commercial planes
Lars Andersen, vice president 777 programme

The US-based firm said it hoped Wednesday's world record attempt would encourage airlines to offer non-stop flights across the world, saving fuel and time spent on stopovers.
Boeing is facing fierce competition from European manufacturer Airbus, which earlier this year launched its A380 double-decker passenger jet with the aim of capturing the long-haul market.
The Boeing 777 competes directly with the widely-used Airbus A340-500, which has a flight range of 10,380 miles.
Making history
Boeing said the planned flight from Hong Kong would carry 35 passengers, including Boeing executives and clients, journalists and crew members.
BBC transport correspondent Tom Symonds is among the passengers.


"Boeing is set to make aviation history in the next few hours and we are going to set a new long-distance non-stop record for commercial planes," said Lars Andersen, Boeing's vice president in charge of the 777 programme.
Boeing said advanced technology, including the use of lighter materials, and greater fuel efficiency enabled the 777-200LR to fly further.
"The Worldliner uses less fuel to fly further, " said Mr Andersen.
The company said Guinness World Records representatives would monitor the plane's arrival at London's Heathrow airport.
The flight's captain, Suzanna Darcy-Hennemann, said she hoped to "smash the current record".
The twin-engine Boeing 777-200LR, which is due to come into service next year with Pakistan International Airlines, will be able to carry 301 passengers. Qatar Airways, Air India and Taiwanese carrier EVA Air have also announced orders.
 

wmuflyguy

flunky
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Posts
2,006
Total Time
5k+
Wow, I would go bonkers sitting there for 23 hours. Imagine how great that place would smell with 400 paxs after 23 hours.
 

nyboilermaker

Well-known member
Joined
May 18, 2002
Posts
150
Total Time
Plenty
Ugh, I can barely stand a trip across the pond let alone one half way around the world. I hope the seats are more comfortable on that thing.
 

Immelman

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 10, 2002
Posts
324
Total Time
340
I'd take it if the company were paying and I wasn't in cattle class.

"Why yes, I'll have another champagne thank you... no no leave the bottle"... I'll have time to get a nice buzz going 5-6 times with naps in between.
 

414Flyer

Down with Chemtrails!
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Posts
4,948
Total Time
4200
RB-36 could stay up quite a bit longer than that, in excess of 40 hours, but not anywhere near the speed of the 777.
 

RipCurl

surfing the midwest
Joined
Feb 17, 2004
Posts
197
Total Time
2500
40 hours?!? At what kind of speed?



EDIT - Holy jeez wikipedia says 50 hours... and capable of 60,000 feet. Can anybody confirm this?
 
Last edited:

414Flyer

Down with Chemtrails!
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Posts
4,948
Total Time
4200
My grandfather flew the RB-36 from what was then Rapid City AFB, now Ellsworth.

The RB-36 was optimized for high altitude and high endurance, with most anything not needed for recon, like guns, etc removed, those versions were called "Featherweight" models.

He mentioned missions of mid 40s in hours out of Thule Greenland, where they would just fly up and down Soviet airspace boundaries, getting any kind of intel they could. I think he said they also had 3 flight crews on there too, because of the very long hours.

Not sure if they ever crossed Soviet airspace or not, a lot of that history is still classified. It finally came out in the 90s how many aircraft we lost in the cold war, no RB-36s were on there.

Another interesting thing about the B-36, up at 50,000 ft, it could outmanuver its contemporary fighters. An F-80 or F-86 would right on the edge of a stall even in level flight there, and anything but the shallowest turn would result in a stall, but the 36 could still turn up there, due to its low wing loading (really big wings)
 

Spooky 1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Posts
987
Total Time
Some
Paris to San Franciso

Sorry guys, but TWA used to fly from Paris to San Franciso in 22.5 hours in the L1649 Constellation, circa 1956-57.
 

Spooky 1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Posts
987
Total Time
Some
GrnClvrs said:
Doubt if it was non-stop.

Sorry, but yes it WAS NON-Stop. The L1649A Constellation was the pinicale of the piston era long range aircraft. Sure there may have been an occasional tech stops when the flight plans ran over 23+ hours, but usually they did it non-stop. I was on a ferry flight from Hamburg to Oakland California that ran around 22 hours back in 1967. Three pilots, two FE's, two Nav's. A real crowd.
 

mzaharis

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Posts
541
Total Time
70
Spooky 1 said:
Are you kidding? Water boy and third pilot. No takeoff, no landing, just holding a heading!

Actually, Suzanna Darcy-Hennemann is the 777-200LR Project chief test pilot.
 

Spooky 1

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Posts
987
Total Time
Some
mzaharis said:
Actually, Suzanna Darcy-Hennemann is the 777-200LR Project chief test pilot.

I have worked with her when I was on the 777 at Brand X. Very accomplished pilot and an exceptional public speaker. She has done technical briefings at the Boeing Users Conference and her presentations are always excellent. I think she is or was at least current in all the Boeing production models. Started as an engineer at Boeing and worked her way up through the ranks. Pretty exceptional sucess story.
 

Vector4fun

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 25, 2003
Posts
796
Total Time
1700
I would need a dose of fentanyl and a drool napkin like the Dentist uses.

Any trip over about 10 hours would make me nuts. Please, MAKE ME change planes in ORD, ATL, ANYWHERE!!!!
 

414Flyer

Down with Chemtrails!
Joined
Jan 20, 2002
Posts
4,948
Total Time
4200
Spooky 1 said:
Sorry, but yes it WAS NON-Stop. The L1649A Constellation was the pinicale of the piston era long range aircraft. Sure there may have been an occasional tech stops when the flight plans ran over 23+ hours, but usually they did it non-stop. I was on a ferry flight from Hamburg to Oakland California that ran around 22 hours back in 1967. Three pilots, two FE's, two Nav's. A real crowd.

That and the DC-7C were the peak of piston airliners. However not long at all after they were developed, the 707 was entering service, giving both of those piston airliners short lives.
 

mzaharis

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Posts
541
Total Time
70
Spooky 1 said:
I have worked with her when I was on the 777 at Brand X. Very accomplished pilot and an exceptional public speaker. She has done technical briefings at the Boeing Users Conference and her presentations are always excellent. I think she is or was at least current in all the Boeing production models. Started as an engineer at Boeing and worked her way up through the ranks. Pretty exceptional sucess story.

Sorry that I missed your facetiousness. I haven't had the privilege of working with her, but from what I've read, she seems like quite the sharp one.

I saw a picture of her with the 777 chief program pilot, Frank Santoni. Definitely different from the old Tex Johnston "I'll roll this bucking airplane with my spurs on" look. More like a couple of suburban soccer parents. I guess "the right stuff" is a bit more buttoned down these days. ;)

http://www.707sim.com/images/tex-johnston-cover.jpg
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/777family/200LR/images/frank_suzanna777.jpg
 

Mach.75

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2004
Posts
15
Total Time
1000
Here's my ?: Why didn't it just fly West to London, it looks like it would be shorter?;)
 
Top