Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

24 more pilots for ASa

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
The company put the TLV at 75, but in the end after the OUR union proved the point that this would not work or be acceptable, they boh agreed that a lower TLV was needed.

It ended up being 68ish, I dont remember exactly.

If you are such an EXPERT AT EVERYTHING, state things correctly.

Otherwise...

We all know you wont.


Hey XJT guys, this person does not speak for 1700 ASA pilots.


Get back to me when you have 10 days off during any busy month.

BTW-They fixed the credits for the 4-days on the 200. That was the root of the problem-it would have made it very hard to hit TLV without doing some crazy stuff. Try real hard-use you imagination, and really noodle out what this system would do with 4-days credited to 14 hours-those are the pairings we went "live" with, and it would have been a mess.

If this were not fixed, we would have a hell of a lot of pissed off pilots. Once again-the hard way.

-The merger is giving us a huge opportunity to fix this problem. We shouldn't let it go to waste just because the company and union repaired the first huge screw-up. They never have to fix anything else-according to the contract everyone thinks is so awesome.
 
Last edited:
You are a self appointed expert.

I swear, it would not matter one bit what changes are made here, you would not be happy.

I feel sorry for those who live around you.

Didn't I hear that you the expert, messed up your bid?

Yet you come here to lecture to the Internet world.
 
Ok, they changed the Value after closing the bid.

What was the better choice?

Put out another email with delayed bid closing date to allow everyone to rebid?

Or

Set the value and keep the timeline as close to what the goal was?

Keep in mind this was the first time for the real deal and life is not perfect.

The overwhelming majority were pleased with the outcome of Feb. PBS, our PBS guys have no doubt learned from this bid and will make adjustments.

You guys talk so tough, yet if you actually sat in the hot seat and had to make the choice for this FEB bid, I'd bet money things would be just the same.
 
Last edited:
You are a self appointed expert.

I swear, it would not matter one bit what changes are made here, you would not be happy.

I feel sorry for those who live around you.

Didn't I hear that you the expert, messed up your bid?

Yet you come here to lecture to the Internet world.

My bid was fine. I do know how to work the system as well as anyone. I even know enough to see the problems inherent in this system. The main one involves pairings-you put garbage pairings in-guess what comes out? Fortunately, the pairings were fixed for Feb.

I know we have an opportunity to fix these problems, but I am afraid that we will squander this last opportunity because so many of our people really have to learn the hard way.

We can do this two ways-we can be proactive and use this merger situation to fix these issues, or we can get screwed by a poor agreement for the next 10 years.

-I am really hoping XJET guys don't like to "learn the hard way" as much as we do.
 
You guys talk so tough, yet if you actually sat in the hot seat and had to make the choice for this FEB bid, I'd bet money things would be just the same.

I definitely see your point. It is a good one. I do appreciate the fact that these lines were fixed.

The company showed its hand. You seem to know what is going on. Do you like what the company showed us with those original pairings? I don't.

We should all recognize that this situation can and must be fixed. We can force the company to construct acceptable trips. This system will not work without good trips-and a good mix thereof.

Let's don't find out what 14 hour 4-days will do, the hard way. It would be bad.
 
Last edited:
Any assignment is to a vacancy so can't be done that way. Any new spots created are open to bid by senior pilots. All remaining openings are then filled by the newhires.

Hang on...

When I was hired, my entire new-hire class was assigned to the CR7.

Is that because nobody bid for the vacancy for those FO slots?
 
crj567 makes some good points, cmon cut him/her some slack. pbs good but the pairings have to be built correctly, and the pairings blew so alpa asa got onto the company and rebuilt the pairings. hopefully next month and & in the future the company will build decent pairings, and a good selection of trips beyond 4 days. copy dat?
 
crj567 makes some good points, cmon cut him/her some slack. pbs good but the pairings have to be built correctly, and the pairings blew so alpa asa got onto the company and rebuilt the pairings. hopefully next month and & in the future the company will build decent pairings, and a good selection of trips beyond 4 days. copy dat?

Thanks dude-

Let's focus on how to fix this thing. I will never be a fan of this PBS agreement, that is not news.

What is amazing is that wehave a rare chance to fix this thing so that we will never again have to rely on the kindness of CT and SH, the Poopster. They would not have lifted a finger to help us under normal circumstances.

If it weren't for the merger-and their desire to make this thing look good for XJET, we would be lucky to have 11 days off this month. The original pairings would have beem a real eye-opener for everyone.

-I know many of you think I am blowing smoke. Ask your nearest PBS trainer what will happen when we plug 14 hour 4-days into this thing (the original trips were pretty much that awful)-ask them how many days off you can expect with that eventuality. It is time to go through some "what-if" scenarios and really understand what can happen. If it can get bad-it will, ASA has taken full advantage of any and every loophole and oversight in every past agreement. Why should they stop now?

-Let's fix this thing and make it something we can enjoy.
 
Last edited:
Or scrap it all for something better! Just saying...:)

The big thing is pairing construction. If we could just fix that major issue, I would actually be a fan of the system. It allows a lot of cool stuff, but it also allows the company nearly limitless free reign with building trips as crappy as they can imagine. And they have quite an imagination. I really don't everyone stuck at 10 or 11 days off per month. CT and SH would love nothing better.

While we have momentum on our side, we MUST fix this problem. If we don't we will be stuck flying garbage for 10 years.
 
Ask your nearest PBS trainer what will happen when we plug 14 hour 4-days into this thing (the original trips were pretty much that awful)-ask them how many days off you can expect with that eventuality. It is time to go through some "what-if" scenarios and really understand what can happen. If it can get bad-it will, ASA has taken full advantage of any and every loophole and oversight in every past agreement. Why should they stop now?

5 four days?

This is pappagiorio's wet dream. EVERYBODY at work 20 days a month, low block. LOTS of airport sits AKA airport ready reserve. We dont need any reserves, WE are all reserves.
 
I'm really gettin tired of the fear being spread.

Dispute resolution language​
o​
This language specifies a coin-toss method for publishing of the lines,
if the Association and the Company cannot mutually agree on the final
schedule.

o​
If the coin-toss method is used three times during a six month period,

the dispute is moved to an expedited arbitration.

Trip Construction Language​
o​
Limit placed on the total number of four (4) day trips within a position
to sixty-percent (60%) maximum.

o​
Trips will not be constructed to exceed four (4) days without the

consent of the Association.

 
Trip Construction – Replace​
34
35 1. Trip Construction
36 a. The Company and the Association recognize that a variety of
37 productive trips are essential for the best overall PBS bid run solution.
38 To the extent reasonably practicable and considering the Company’s
39 utilization parameters, operational productivity and performance, costs
40 and efficient use of staffing, the Company will construct trips as​
41 follows:
(1) With block times front loaded toward the beginning of the trip,
2​
(2) Minimize the use of extended breaks within a duty period, and

3​
(3) Maintain a mix of types of trips, e.g., 1-day, 2-day, 3-day, 4-day,

4​
and

5 (4)​
These parameters are to be considered in the context of the entire

6​
schedule, and the parties recognize that not all trips will comply

7​
with these parameters.
8 b. Notwithstanding the parameters in paragraph 1.a., above, the
9 Company will not construct more than sixty percent (60%) of the total
10 number of trips in each position as 4-day trips.
11 (1) CDO and BOTC trips will be included in the calculation of the
12 percentage limitation in paragraph 1.b., above, regarding 4-day
13 trips;
14 (2) A trip will not be constructed to exceed four (4) days.
15 c. Notwithstanding the limitations in paragraphs 1.a., and 1.b., above, the
16 PWG, may waive such limitations on a case-by-case basis to improve
17 the quality of trips and lines. Such waiver will not be unreasonably
18 withheld. The Company will increase the number of CDO trips, as
19 reasonably practicable, so as to enhance the ability to meet the
20 parameters required in paragraph 1.b., above.
21 d.
The Company will provide the Association with access to the pairing

22​
generation software. The pairings generated by the Association

23​
member(s) will be taken into consideration when developing a pairing

24​
solution.

25​
e. ASC members may be required to execute a confidentiality and

26​
nondisclosure agreement to participate in the activities described in

27 paragraph d., above.
 
Tell us all, senior Medeco, what will happen if we have 4 days credited to 15-17 hours (like we originally did for Feb,)and that credit window is 70 hours?

-What will the system do? Hint:-It won't just give up and let you go.

-Please enlighten us....

-Let's say you have four 4-days which give you a total credit of 63.5 hours, and the system only has a few hours to go-what will happen?
 
Last edited:
I'm really gettin tired of the fear being spread.

Dispute resolution language​
o​
This language specifies a coin-toss method for publishing of the lines,
if the Association and the Company cannot mutually agree on the final
schedule.

o​
If the coin-toss method is used three times during a six month period,

the dispute is moved to an expedited arbitration.

Trip Construction Language​
o​
Limit placed on the total number of four (4) day trips within a position
to sixty-percent (60%) maximum.

o​
Trips will not be constructed to exceed four (4) days without the

consent of the Association.


-Oh-and please explain the "coin toss" thing to all the XJET guys!

-They will LOVE IT!

-I will try not to laugh!
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top