Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

2-9-10 7pm: UPDATE: Delta, US Airways May Drop Planned Landing Slot Swap

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Voice Of Reason

Reading Is Fundamental !
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Posts
1,369
UPDATE: Delta, US Airways May Drop Planned Landing Slot Swap




(RECASTS and UPDATES with company comment.)
By Ann Keeton
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
CHICAGO -(Dow Jones)- Delta Air Lines Inc (DAL) and US Airways Group Inc. ( LCC) said Tuesday they may drop a planned asset swap after regulators requested they sell airport slots to new entrants to win approval.
The U.S. Department of Transportation tentatively approved the slot swap at Reagan Washington National Airport and New York's LaGuardia Airport, announced by the airlines last summer. However, DOT's requirement that the two must divest many of the slots at the two congested airports irked both carriers.
"However, we expect that if this order is implemented as proposed the transaction will not go forward and significant consumer benefits will never be realized. Both airlines will review the DOT's proposed rulemaking to determine our next steps," they said in a joint statement.
The airlines in August requested permission for an exchange that would give Delta 125 slot pairs--with each pair equaling one takeoff and one landing--in New York, while giving up 42 slot pairs to US Airways in Washington, D.C., along with route authorities to fly to Sao Paulo and Tokyo.
The DOT said its approval is contingent on the airlines' opening up service at the two airports to more competition by selling some of their slot interests to carriers with no or limited service there.
With the transaction, both airlines have said they expect to increase profits at their hub operations and maintain shuttle services.
The move would give Delta, the world's largest airline by passenger traffic, a chance to increase flights from LaGuardia to small and medium-sized U.S. cities. The airline could help to reduce chronic flight congestion at the busy airport by using larger planes than US Airways has employed.
US Airways has said it can substantially add passengers in Washington, D.C., where it already has a strong presence.
Continental Airlines Inc. (CAL) and AirTran Holdings Inc. (AAI) have proposed a smaller slot swap for New York City-area flights.
The DOT on Tuesday opened a 30-day public comment period before making a final decision on the Delta/US Air plan.
The Transportation Department is expected this week to decide whether to grant long-sought antitrust approval for transatlantic flights to the Oneworld global airline alliance, including British Airways and American Airlines, a unit of AMR Corp. (AMR). The U.S. Department of Justice offered an opinion that giving antitrust approval, which would allow the airlines to form closer business relationships, would hamper competition and be harmful to consumers.
The Department of Justice is also expected to comment on the slot swap, although the DOT is the final decision-maker.
-By Ann Keeton, Dow Jones Newswires; 312-750-4120; [email protected]
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 02-09-101901ET Copyright (c) 2010 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
 
CHICAGO -(Dow Jones)- Delta Air Lines Inc (DAL) and US Airways Group Inc. ( LCC) said Tuesday they may drop a planned asset swap after regulators requested they sell airport slots to new entrants to win approval.
The U.S. Department of Transportation tentatively approved the slot swap at Reagan Washington National Airport and New York's LaGuardia Airport, announced by the airlines last summer. However, DOT's requirement that the two must divest many of the slots at the two congested airports irked both carriers.

Why would the DOT EXPECT...or even encourage new entrants into any market right now? :rolleyes:
 
USAPA was against the swap. Go thank those dumba$$es. Just kidding. No way that Mary poppins fake union has enough pull to tie a shoe.
 
Senator Schumacher of NYC. and maybe Oberstar That is all.

I do not see this sticking. It is unprecedented. It is a shot in the dark. If they want to do it this way, they can but it will get ugly. These two airlines will not play along.
 
and why not have SW or JB in DCA or Lga(more)? what good does it do to have a single dominant carrier at both Airports? I'm suprised they even approved this at all.... well not really..
 
I think USAir wanted out of a lot of smaller NY cities (like Ithaca) to LGA, and DL agreed to take them and put small jets on them instead of the Colgan Saabs and Piedmont DH8s. So, if USAir decided to dump them anyway, will anyone take those routes, or just let them die? Thanks Sen Shumacher, you just screwed cities in your own State! Pure Genius.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
and why not have SW or JB in DCA or Lga(more)? what good does it do to have a single dominant carrier at both Airports? I'm suprised they even approved this at all.... well not really..

Hey, can you give up some of your ORD slots to Virgin America, and while you are at it, also give up a gate or two? And, since it looks like you are a JB guy, how about giving Virgin America some of your primetime slots at rush hour at JFK? Sure, just give them a few, maybe 20 or so. No biggie. Maybe they want to go to LGB too. How about 5 or 10 slots there also?

I think it is time DL asks the LGB city council for 10-20 slots at LGB too, and they can fly it all at a loss.....or throw some Mesa Dash-8s in there during the JB rush.


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
Last edited:
USAPA was against the swap. Go thank those dumba$$es. Just kidding. No way that Mary poppins fake union has enough pull to tie a shoe.

You are so wrong! USAPA has accomplished more than ALPA ever has! USAPA is a union by pilots for pilots, unlike Herndon who steals from pilots and delivers nothing.
 
Hey, can you give up some of your ORD slots to Virgin America, and while you are at it, also give up a gate or two? And, since it looks like you are a JB guy, how about giving Virgin America some of your primetime slots at rush hour at JFK? Sure, just give them a few, maybe 20 or so. No biggie. Maybe they want to go to LGB too. How about 5 or 10 slots there also?

I think it is time DL asks the LGB city council for 10-20 slots at LGB too, and they can fly it all at a loss.....or throw some Mesa Dash-8s in there during the JB rush.


Bye Bye---General Lee


Lee, remove your self from a delta bias for a sec. With a huge foot print in JFK and a two terminal LGA monopoly...did you really expect it to be approved as is? of course not. I'm sure your exec's didn't either, now they have a position to bargain/work from. Think of it logically.
 
I'm sure that WN would be interested in acquiring some DCA and some additional LGA slots as well. I guess we'll see how bad US/DL want this deal to go through. It's not like we're going to be going head to head with either US or DL. Out of DCA we'd probably only fly to MDW and out of LGA we might add a flight to HOU or maybe DEN. So there's no reason for US or DL to be afraid of allowing us a few extra slots is there?:uzi:;)
 
Last edited:
I'm all for allowing WN the opportunity to bid for some LGA and Especially some DCA slots. It won't hurt anybody. Remember, the government won't let any legacy carrier fail....
 
I'm sure that WN would be interested in acquiring some DCA and some additional LGA slots as well. I guess we'll see how bad US/DL want this deal to go through. It's not like we're going to be going head to head with either US or DL. Out of DCA we'd probably only fly to MDW and out of LGA we might add a flight to HOU or maybe DEN. So there's no reason for US or DL to be afraid of allowing us a few extra slots is there?:uzi:;)


Nope, no harm at all. Just like there is no harm in giving up just a little bit of scope...

Giving up a competitive advantage NEVER helps unless you are playing with friends, and there are no friends in business.
 
Divesting slots at DCA and LGA to carriers such as AirTran, JetBlue, and Southwest would hurt yields for both Delta and US Airways. This slot swap deal just isn't worth it with the DOT slot divestiture requirement.
 
I'm sure that WN would be interested in acquiring some DCA and some additional LGA slots as well. I guess we'll see how bad US/DL want this deal to go through. It's not like we're going to be going head to head with either US or DL. Out of DCA we'd probably only fly to MDW and out of LGA we might add a flight to HOU or maybe DEN. So there's no reason for US or DL to be afraid of allowing us a few extra slots is there?:uzi:;)
So there's no reason for US or DL to be afraid of allowing us a few extra slots is there? YEAAAH,Riiiight, SW always goes after US or DL as a small littler sheep before turning into a Wolf.:beer:
 
Lee, remove your self from a delta bias for a sec. With a huge foot print in JFK and a two terminal LGA monopoly...did you really expect it to be approved as is? of course not. I'm sure your exec's didn't either, now they have a position to bargain/work from. Think of it logically.


The problem here is very big and unprecedented.

One again the government is trying to pick winners and losers. It never does a good job of that.

Furthermore, Delta and US Air acquired those slots in a slot auction. They are their property. We are not acquiring a airline. We are swapping assets. We are not merging. This is not about anti-trust as you would have if say DAL and CAL merged and we would be required to relinquish slots in the NYC area for anti-trust issues. This is two airlines swapping property.

Getting in the business of telling airlines what they can do and how and what they have to sell is bad business. I think that these two Congressmen behind this scam will be outed. It is politics usual, but totally unacceptable.

Well DAL settele? More than likely not. They are quite irritated. This deal does make DAL the leader in NYC, but it by no means throws out the competition.

If the government wants to be involved they need to regulate the industry completely. If they do not want to regulate it, then the need to stay out and lest the airlines self rationalize. This half baked crud needs to stop. It is why we are where we are as an industry 30 years after deregulation.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top