Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

135 Question

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Refer to FDC Notam 2/5128 IFR Operations - General (Part 2 of 6) and FDC Notam 2/5167 VFR Operations - General (Part 2 of 7) issued shortly after 9/11 and still in effect.

"PART 135 AIRCRAFT THAT DOES NOT HAVE A COMPANY CALL SIGN MUST FILE A "T" PRIOR TO THE AIRCRAFT TAIL NUMBER."
 
Just to follow up, I checked in a 1983 AIM and It says exacty the the same as the current AIM regarding hte use of "tango"

Air Taxi or other commercial operators not having FAA authorized call signs should prefix their normal identification with the phonetic word "Tango."
EXAMPLE -
Tango Aztec Two Four Six Four Alpha.
 
Excel'n said:
Refer to FDC Notam 2/5128 IFR Operations - General (Part 2 of 6) and FDC Notam 2/5167 VFR Operations - General (Part 2 of 7) issued shortly after 9/11 and still in effect.

"PART 135 AIRCRAFT THAT DOES NOT HAVE A COMPANY CALL SIGN MUST FILE A "T" PRIOR TO THE AIRCRAFT TAIL NUMBER."


I believe Excel'n is correct, and that this is the reason that our 135 Ops manual still "requires" our operation to use TN on pax flights.
 
I file TN on every part 135 leg. The only helpful thing that I have ever noticed is that at airports that use LAHSO clearances frequently, I don't ever even get asked to accept one.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top