phishn@daves
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2002
- Posts
- 400
Well said, and I agree.
EXACTLY!! Coming from someone who thinks that a regional airline is a career.:laugh:
PtP
What is up C?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well said, and I agree.
EXACTLY!! Coming from someone who thinks that a regional airline is a career.:laugh:
PtP
12500+ TT, an ATR type & CRJ200 type..... That says it all.
And the genital knows this, and with that he is just "giddy with excitement".
Nothing better for him than the demise of the regional sector!
General,
Being stuck at a regional for what seems to be too long, I can only focus my attention now on the fact that all you guys who allowed regional jets to steal your flying in the first place are at fault for this whole debacle. It doesn't matter who is flying them or whatever.
I think the problem is they didn't really take it back and just accelerated the killing of the regionals.
88 Boeing 717s will be replacing just 17 DC9s and the rest CRJ-200 flying. That's taking it back in a big way.
88 Boeing 717s will be replacing just 17 DC9s and the rest CRJ-200 flying. That's taking it back in a big way.
geez, another wasted 10 minutes of my life reading responses from a GenLee started post. Such boring banter. General Lee, go back to the Major forums where you belong. Fck, you're such a tool.
Hmmm, I would agree if the 200's were't already being axed. Also, a 717 replacing a 200 makes no sense. Are they going to fly the 717 to Pellston, Aberdeen, and Alpena? Delta was going to get the 717's either way as well. Taking it back means either allowing no more larger aircraft at regionals, or even better, scoping out 76 seaters all together. There was nothing done to "take it back". What in the contract allowed the company to get 717's that would not have allowed them to get them if it wasn't passed? Maybe I am missing something.
Hmmm, I would agree if the 200's were't already being axed. Also, a 717 replacing a 200 makes no sense. Are they going to fly the 717 to Pellston, Aberdeen, and Alpena? Delta was going to get the 717's either way as well. Taking it back means either allowing no more larger aircraft at regionals, or even better, scoping out 76 seaters all together. There was nothing done to "take it back". What in the contract allowed the company to get 717's that would not have allowed them to get them if it wasn't passed? Maybe I am missing something.
Enjoy LBB, just dip around the roach back stroking in your salsa.30 more MD90s will be replacing the 17 DC9s. The 88 717s are supposedly pure growth.
Bye Bye---General Lee
Enjoy LBB, just dip around the roach back stroking in your salsa.