brokeflyer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2005
- Posts
- 2,374
I agree, and I don't see how NJA could compete with other companies with 10/250, as much as I would like the money.
These people dont fly netjets for the price tag.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree, and I don't see how NJA could compete with other companies with 10/250, as much as I would like the money.
Unfortunately this career is still somewhat based on the size of a/c determining pay. And when the average phenom/400 pilot makes around $60-75k, I don't see the company ever signing off on the proposed numbers or anything even close.
Now, before anybody jumps to any conclusions, lets agree on a few things.
Few would argue that, in many ways, a fractional pilot has WAY more duties to perform every day than a typical airline pilot. For example, on a typical day, duties include: Crew ground transportation coordinator, fuel and aircraft service supervisor, aircaft maintenance status inspector, passenger and crew catering expeditor, passenger baggage handler, aircraft security officer, cabin safety briefer, cabin customer service representative, company screw-up apologizer, aviation weather evaluator, cockpit decision maker and flight control operator, passenger ground transportation procurer, cabin cleaner and re-stocker, FBO lounge appreciator, professional airline passenger, and, if there's time, wiped-out beer drinker.
So, here's my question for the peanut gallery:
Is the 10/250 proposal
A) An admirable starting point for negotiations that will ultimately be negotiated downward by a substantial amount? Or;
B) A realistic bottom-line benchmark that can be achieved with the appropriate "education" of the EMT by the pilot group? Or;
C) Sheer fantasy.
Discuss. And thanks for keeping the name-calling to a minimum.
Gut,As the Section 6 negotiations at NetJets are just getting going, one contract proposal that seems to be gathering a lot of support is the notion of a 10 year, 7-7 schedule PIC having a base wage of $250,000 and extrapolating the rest of the pay scale from that point.
Now, before anybody jumps to any conclusions, lets agree on a few things.
Few would argue that, in many ways, a fractional pilot has WAY more duties to perform every day than a typical airline pilot. For example, on a typical day, duties include: Crew ground transportation coordinator, fuel and aircraft service supervisor, aircaft maintenance status inspector, passenger and crew catering expeditor, passenger baggage handler, aircraft security officer, cabin safety briefer, cabin customer service representative, company screw-up apologizer, aviation weather evaluator, cockpit decision maker and flight control operator, passenger ground transportation procurer, cabin cleaner and re-stocker, FBO lounge appreciator, professional airline passenger, and, if there's time, wiped-out beer drinker.
I also think most would agree that the fractional segment is its own, unique brand of flying and a direct salary comparison against major airline, regional airline, or traditional corporate is problematic.
Obviously, there are many other important contract sections that will affect total compensation and quality of life. But for the sake of this discussion, let's stick with the basic premise of 10/250.
So, here's my question for the peanut gallery:
Is the 10/250 proposal
A) An admirable starting point for negotiations that will ultimately be negotiated downward by a substantial amount? Or;
B) A realistic bottom-line benchmark that can be achieved with the appropriate "education" of the EMT by the pilot group? Or;
C) Sheer fantasy.
Discuss. And thanks for keeping the name-calling to a minimum.
A.
Seeing how a current 10 yr NJA Capt on the 7/7 makes $119,254 (base), I think it is highly unlikely that a 110% raise will be achieved during this bargaining cycle.
I'm not saying that NJ pilots are not worth that, but if a raise that large were able to be secured you can bet that other areas of the contract, such as scope and work rules, would be gutted. There is always give and take. I would prefer a more modest raise (including COLA provisions) and significant improvements in work rules, scope language, and more schedule options.
To be clear, more power to the Union if they can secure that sort of raise along with all the other improvements that are needed.
Long time lurker, first time poster...it's always intriguing to see how the pilot group feels about things.
Weren't all of those job descriptions laid out for you upon hiring? I'm sure they're not new duties that you feel have been added to your job descriptions since RTS left, and therefore deserve additional compensation. Right? Right?!?!
Each answer has it's own possibility of course
A- most likely IMO, and that's usually how negotiations go, right? each party starts at polar opposites and generally negotiate towards the middle.
B- Sure, but kiss everything goodbye outside of base salary.
C- I'm sure this is the feeling among non-pilot types. making $250k after 10 years of anything outside of sports/medicine/law, etc. is fantasy to many. if pilots get 70% raises, what about everyone else?