Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Homer Jay said:DayJet's finally posted their hiring minimums...and they are RIDICULOUS!!!
ATP
3000TT
1000 PIC
500 PIC in a Turbojet
I was really interested in working for them but seeing as I don't have 500 turbojet PIC, I guess I won't. Anyone else think that is a little excessive?
gunfyter said:Yeah but the Eclipse is Single piloted....
gunfyter said:Yeah but the Eclipse is Single piloted....
Homer Jay said:DayJet's finally posted their hiring minimums...and they are RIDICULOUS!!!
ATP
3000TT
1000 PIC
500 PIC in a Turbojet
I was really interested in working for them but seeing as I don't have 500 turbojet PIC, I guess I won't. Anyone else think that is a little excessive?
Guitar rocker said:They ought to take lessons from the folks in HR at UAL. Correct me if I'm wrong, but at UAL, mins were 250TT, no turbine let alone jet or PIC time required (during their hiring days). Thats just the opposite of excessive.
Captn said:Their website states: Initially they will operate with a crew of 2. That being the case, 500 hrs PIC Turbojet for the Right Seat, does seem a bit on the high side. IMO
So rich people don't want to fly on weekends or holidays? Right. We'll see how long that lasts.AeroBoy said:Starting salary is $50,000, but it's the quality of life that make the job--start and end at the same airport, nine-hour shift (6 am-3 pm or 2 pm to 11 pm), weekends/holidays off, two weeks of vacation, med/dental/vision/life insurance, etc.
AeroBoy said:Those minimums, which are for captains (DayJet is hiring only captains initially), is because DayJet wants to maintain an ARG/US Platinum rating. Starting salary is $50,000, but it's the quality of life that make the job--start and end at the same airport, nine-hour shift (6 am-3 pm or 2 pm to 11 pm), weekends/holidays off, two weeks of vacation, med/dental/vision/life insurance, etc.
gunfyter said:Depends...
Whats the pay?
Ultra Grump said:So rich people don't want to fly on weekends or holidays? Right. We'll see how long that lasts.
sweptwingz said:I sincerely wish Day Jet crews well, but as often as "lightweight" fractional jets go T/U on the road for MX, make darn sure that you have a small overnight bag with you! Rest assured, Day Jets crews won't ALWAYS be getting home each night. Especially on a brand new design that will be probably be "over-cycled" past standard design cycle limits like ALL fractional aircraft are.
Whatever. According to the article, it'll be $3-4 per mile. With fuel costs, more likely $4 or more. Using the example of MGM-JAN, at $4/mile for 188 air miles is $752. Not many non-rich people want to pay that much to go less than 200 miles. In any case, that was not the point. Regardless of whether they're rich or not, anyone going to DayJet thinking they won't be working weekends and holidays will be in for a rude awakening.RNObased said:According to the article on them today in the USA today, they are going after middle management types..... Hardly rich people IMHO..... The truely wealthy won't be caught dead on that jet....
Ultra Grump said:Whatever. According to the article, it'll be $3-4 per mile. With fuel costs, more likely $4 or more. Using the example of MGM-JAN, at $4/mile for 188 air miles is $752. Not many non-rich people want to pay that much to go less than 200 miles. In any case, that was not the point. Regardless of whether they're rich or not, anyone going to DayJet thinking they won't be working weekends and holidays will be in for a rude awakening.[/quote]
Where do you get that impression? Do you have any details? DayJet doesn't sound like a typical fractional or 135 operation. I think it's a bit early to be making those kind of generalized statements.
Dayjet will need good and qualified pilots in order to ensure safety. And with a salary of only $50K or so initially, QOL will probably be a big retention factor...
Corona said:An overnight bag is always a good idea in turbine equipment.
Corona said:However, the Eclipse has been specifically designed from Day One to put up with this type of high-cycle flying. It is a rather sophisticated airplane (autothrottles, etc), but has simple systems; ie no hydraulic, only electric; basic flight control systems, etc.
It's been tailored specifically for its customers' use. Funny; that's the same philosophy that Boeing and Airbus have had for years. Odd that the other corporate manufacturers whose names start with B, C, D, G and R haven't modified their philosophies given the frac model...