General...that was a very informative short term history lesson. I agree with you on 99% of it.
However, with AirTran leading the way for Int'l Ops for SWA, I think you will see a large increase in international flying for the new merged carrier. Furthermore, I also think you will see an announcement of a 3rd fleet type soon, possibly at the Paris Air Show this summer. Could be a version of the 787 or could be Boeing's new design, (tentatively named the 797). My bet is on the latter.
Delta is a great carrier. I commute on them 50% of the time. Good infrastructure, customer service, and professional appearance. Now if you could just get those ATL gate agents to understand that a Passport is not required when occupying a cabin seat for Jumpseating purposes; only sitting on the actual cockpit jumpseat requires that.
I apologize if that happened to you. I don't commute since I live here in ATL, so I don't really know. I would call the jumpseat coordinator and your airline, and he/she could call ours, and talk about it. I am sure there are some gate agents that are misinformed, and that needs to be corrected.
As far as your thoughts on big INTL travel on SWA, you might be right. I just don't think so, because those markets are quickly becoming saturated. Single airlines flying particular routes across the atlantic are quickly being replaced by groups, like SkyTeam and One World. Look at American and British Airways. Between London Heathrow and JFK, there is now almost hourly service between the two on AA and BA. They use AA's feed into JFK, and BA's feed into LHR to fill the planes. Now, SkyTeam does the same from Paris to the USA, and also AMS to the USA. Delta has 3 or 4 767-400s from LHR to JFK also, further adding to the glut. Big corporations and putting their people on these "teams" to save money on corporate contracts with the airlines, and those people could fly on any team from anywhere to anywhere. CAL/UAL and USAir are in the Star Alliance, DL is in SkyTeam, and AA in OneWorld. That fills up most of the INTL flying from the US. Now, Southwest would aim for the leisure traveller no doubt, not associated with corporations, and more worried about costs. On the other side of the Atlantic, there are a couple airlines also hungry for the same. Ryanair has already pointed out that they are interested, and at one time thought about getting A330s (not Boeing like the rest of their fleet) for Trans Atlantic travel. Easyjet is another one waiting. Then you have Air Berlin, who is number 2 in Germany, and already bought LTU and has continued flying lower fare flights from DUS and MUC to LAX, RSW, MIA, and the Carribbean. If Southwest attempts to try something similar, Ryanair (who is just as successful) and Easyjet will pounce, and that will mean even more seats available for not that many leisure passengers. The 787 or 797 may be a great fit for Southwest, but there is a finite amount of people that can afford that travel, and way too many seats already. Throw in every country over there has their own larger airline, and won't give up without a fight, and then you have got a bigger problem. You have got to have the feed capability here in the US, and you have got to have onward connections there to places that most cannot get to nonstop from here. That is the good thing about alliances. I guess you can ally yourselves with Ryanair, but they seem to fly from far out airports to keep costs down (something Southwest used to do more often), and that would mean trying to do the same. Add to that strict EU laws, and tough to get slots at bigger airports thanks to protectionism, and it will be a tough task. IMHO.
Bye Bye---General Lee