Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Asa/xjt<---------

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
If you folks think UAL/CAL will keep CAL scope or reduce it, AND secure a decent pay raise, I would love some of that Ganja you smoking

Unfortunately, that's probably true.

And what CAL/UAL pilot would care enough when you dangle a 30% payraise in front of them..
 
Well said statement from Bill Swelbar in his outlook for 2011

There are still barriers to better operations on the labor front as well. Union leaders need to decide once and for all how to address the split between mainline and regional flying all the while securing/maintaining some form of scope protection their members expect. A good start would be to stop the charade that this is a 76-seat issue. The mainline does not want that flying because they will not accept the rates necessary to do the flying. Once again, labor did much to create the problem, now it is time that they figure out how best to fix it.
 
I say let em fly the e-170 but only put 60 seats on the aircraft! That would be a compromise would it not?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top