ok thanks ACL, you know it's a sad state of affairs when I trust your word over the MEC's. Again, given the history of cloak and dagger LOA's signed and announced post signature...you can see why we are suspicious of rumors and subsequent denials. 63%, wow...that is just wrong.
Andy, who on the MEC told you anything about this? Really....
I ask because I talk to my reps and they know the ramifications of such.
I am sure that nothing OFFICIAL has been asked. Soft probing like last year, yes, of course. They want to see if there is a chance of this floating. I think they realized the response was overwhelming that it is not going to happen.
Is there a time and place that it may, yes. Are they going to OFFICIALLY ask at some point, yes. With the guys on our LEC here in ATL, combined wit the DTW, CVG, LAX, NYC, and MEM reps at a min I suspect that even if it got to the MEC for a vote it would fail.
The general consensus that I have gathered is that no one will accept a scope sale, but many do not want to buy back scope at the cost of their restoration efforts. Maybe as contracts come due, but not for 2012.
That said, DAL does need some apples to entice the FFD operators with to change the terms of these contracts. Bigger jets or more 76 seat jets makes a lot of sense. If they could dump them they would, but as they say a contract is a contract.
Best way to deal with it is to buy the airlines and dissolve em. Many of them can be bought at rock bottom prices.