Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Falcon sms = transonic????

  • Thread starter Thread starter JJET44
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 17

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

JJET44

Well-known member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Posts
689
Rumor has it that Dassault's new SMS (Super-Mid-Size) project will be a M1.0 airplane (12,500 lbs thrust per engine and MGTOW in the mid 30's.) They have supposedly found a way to build an airplane that can travel at M1.0 without creating a sonic boom!!
 
Its still not a Grumman.

And hell, so long as it can go to FL520 I would be happy. Id go there and take FMS/Airshow pictures.
 
I'm curious, you wouldn't be fond of Gulfstreams would you? I noticed it mentioned once or twice in your sig.;)


Few aircraft embody such an iconic level as genuinely as a Grumman. To a pilot, this jet is a symbol of all that a flying machine should be – and more. A mix of complexity and capability that engages the mind, yet never numbs it; a blend of luxury with the assurance that comfort is still second to safety; a combination of form and function that resonate as one.
 
Few aircraft embody such an iconic level as genuinely as a Grumman. To a pilot, this jet is a symbol of all that a flying machine should be – and more. A mix of complexity and capability that engages the mind, yet never numbs it; a blend of luxury with the assurance that comfort is still second to safety; a combination of form and function that resonate as one.


Is there a puke icon here somewhere...(-_-).
 
I can't imagine having 12.5k thrust PER SIDE, on a midsize airframe, would do much for Falcon's "legendary fuel burns".
 
A wing that can penetrate Mach 1 with no shockwave= the holy grail of aerodynamics.


I think the best that NASA is working on right now is "shaping" the boom to sound more like a distant thunder clap than what it currently is.
 
Few aircraft embody such an iconic level as genuinely as a Grumman. To a pilot, this jet is a symbol of all that a flying machine should be – and more. A mix of complexity and capability that engages the mind, yet never numbs it; a blend of luxury with the assurance that comfort is still second to safety; a combination of form and function that resonate as one.

Nice description of the iconic Bonanza. 60+ years later, unable to be improved upon.
 
Nice description of the iconic Bonanza. 60+ years later, unable to be improved upon.


Son, I am describing the iconic Gulfstream business jet - gods machine.

Gulfstreams -True aviation Icons...things that we recognize easily because of qualities that elevate them beyond our ordinary levels of awareness to a place where a single word or phrase, a single sound, or even a single image evokes everything we know about them. Icons are so powerful that they do more than inspire thoughts; they elevate feeling to the cusp of our consciousness.
 
Going supersoinc on a drawing board don't count.

Yeah, plenty of power, that what French Aircraft are known for.

I can see it know, but Monsieur, read the fine print, we only gurantee supersonic while the aircraft is in descent mode, with 2 pilots weighing a combined 180 pounds, no interior ...........

But don't worry we with come out with come out with an A model, a B, a C, an EX, DX, LX, EZ that will do what we originally intended it to do and thats no BS
 
Going supersoinc on a drawing board don't count.

Yeah, plenty of power, that what French Aircraft are known for.

I can see it know, but Monsieur, read the fine print, we only gurantee supersonic while the aircraft is in descent mode, with 2 pilots weighing a combined 180 pounds, no interior ...........

But don't worry we with come out with come out with an A model, a B, a C, an EX, DX, LX, EX that will do what we originally intended it to do and thats no BS


Err, right, I guess that is why Gulfstream (not Grumman) never built a GIIb/GIIc/GIIIac/GIIIdc/GIV/GIVsp/G300/G400/G450/GV/G550 after the orginal G-II. All designed around the G-1 fusulage. :p
 
Son, I am describing the iconic Gulfstream business jet - gods machine.

Gulfstreams -True aviation Icons...things that we recognize easily because of qualities that elevate them beyond our ordinary levels of awareness to a place where a single word or phrase, a single sound, or even a single image evokes everything we know about them. Icons are so powerful that they do more than inspire thoughts; they elevate feeling to the cusp of our consciousness.
That's awesome, I wish I could drink that Koolaid in my psuedo-French, low riding, RJ derivative, 604.:bawling:
 
That's awesome, I wish I could drink that Koolaid in my psuedo-French, low riding, RJ derivative, 604.:bawling:



Maybe someday. Keep up the hard work and you may get here.

Throughout the history of aviation both men and machines alike have reached this loftiest dais of distinction. Indeed, their relationship to one another is often so interwoven that they are often synonymous with one another.

Few aircraft embody such an iconic level as genuinely as a Gulfstream. To a pilot, this jet is a symbol of all that a flying machine should be – and more.

Good Luck, its all worth it.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom