redflyer65
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2004
- Posts
- 4,456
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Safety isn't an issue. I go between the 757 and 767.... that's a bit more of a difference with a 150,000 pound weight difference, different handing characteristics and a very different sight picture. The differences between the 200 and 900 are minimal...
The issue is that they are trying to cheapen the operation and con the pilots out of more money by only paying 200 rates except when they fly the 900. That's what I would be pissed about. It requires less reserves in the system and cuts pay back to the 200 rates for all the ATL based rsvs except when they get a 900 flight.
I believe some FUPM bracelets should be in order for the 9e guys!
Safety isn't an issue. I go between the 757 and 767
Just curious does one approach nose up and one nose down. If you use landing technique in one does it crashthe other? Do you have a 500 hr FO that you have to manage? Are you one?
The company is pushing hard to have all pilots fly both models (per a TA). Is that safety or savings?
A jump from the -200 to the -700 maybe. From the -200 to the -900 is not that great of an idea in my opinion...
What a great time for the company to propose such an idea. Great job.